Føllesdal, Andreas: Kommentar til Dag Østerberg: Kan John Rawls legitimere nyliberalisme?. 2011, (Institutt for statsvitenskap, UiO Oslo). @misc{RN54682,
title = {Kommentar til Dag Østerberg: Kan John Rawls legitimere nyliberalisme?},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {2011},
date = {2011-03-01},
publisher = {Institutt for statsvitenskap, UiO},
note = {Institutt for statsvitenskap, UiO Oslo},
keywords = {John Rawls, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: Hva slags likhet, Hvorfor likhet? Amartya Sen, John Rawls og Hilde Bojer om funksjoner, rettigheter og mulighetsrom”. 2009, (Det Norske Videnskaps-Akademi – DNVA Seminar for Hilde Bojer Oslo). @misc{RN54734,
title = {Hva slags likhet, Hvorfor likhet? Amartya Sen, John Rawls og Hilde Bojer om funksjoner, rettigheter og mulighetsrom”},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {2009},
date = {2009-12-01},
publisher = {Det Norske Videnskaps-Akademi - DNVA Seminar for Hilde Bojer},
note = {Det Norske Videnskaps-Akademi - DNVA Seminar for Hilde Bojer Oslo},
keywords = {John Rawls, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Om John Rawls’ politiske filosofi. 2007, (Civita Oslo). @misc{RN54794,
title = {Om John Rawls’ politiske filosofi},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2007},
date = {2007-09-01},
publisher = {Civita},
note = {Civita Oslo},
keywords = {John Rawls, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Rawls’ ‘Law of Peoples’. 2005, (Copenhagen Business School Workshop on John Rawls Copenhagen). @misc{RN54853,
title = {Rawls’ 'Law of Peoples'},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2005},
date = {2005-09-01},
publisher = {Copenhagen Business School Workshop on John Rawls},
note = {Copenhagen Business School Workshop on John Rawls Copenhagen},
keywords = {John Rawls, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: Om John Rawls vs. Robert Nozick. 2004, (Studentersamfunnet, Universitetet i Bergen Bergen). @misc{RN54874,
title = {Om John Rawls vs. Robert Nozick},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {2004},
date = {2004-03-01},
publisher = {Studentersamfunnet, Universitetet i Bergen},
note = {Studentersamfunnet, Universitetet i Bergen Bergen},
keywords = {John Rawls, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: John Rawls, vår tids viktigste filosof?. 2003, (Studentersamfunnet UiO Oslo). @misc{RN54908,
title = {John Rawls, vår tids viktigste filosof?},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2003},
date = {2003-09-01},
publisher = {Studentersamfunnet UiO},
note = {Studentersamfunnet UiO Oslo},
keywords = {John Rawls, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: On John Rawls: Justice as Fairness: A Briefer Restatement. 2001, (East China Normal University Shanghai). @misc{RN54982,
title = {On John Rawls: Justice as Fairness: A Briefer Restatement},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2001},
date = {2001-08-01},
publisher = {East China Normal University},
note = {East China Normal University Shanghai},
keywords = {John Rawls, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: Kulturell pluralisme og John Rawls’ teori om enighet og likevekt. 1996, (HF, UiO Etikkseminar Oslo). @misc{RN55111,
title = {Kulturell pluralisme og John Rawls' teori om enighet og likevekt},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {1996},
date = {1996-08-01},
publisher = {HF, UiO Etikkseminar},
note = {HF, UiO Etikkseminar Oslo},
keywords = {John Rawls, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: The standing of states: On John Rawls’ “Law of Peoples”. In: Koller, Peter; Puhl, Klaus (Ed.): Current issues in political philosophy, The Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society, Kirchberg am Wechsel, Austria, 1996, (Volume ID: 4
Call Number: (A)). @inbook{RN23660,
title = {The standing of states: On John Rawls' "Law of Peoples"},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
editor = {Peter Koller and Klaus Puhl},
year = {1996},
date = {1996-01-01},
booktitle = {Current issues in political philosophy},
publisher = {The Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society},
address = {Kirchberg am Wechsel, Austria},
note = {Volume ID: 4
Call Number: (A)},
keywords = {John Rawls},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: John Rawls: bibliografi. In: Norsk Statsvitenskapelig tidsskrift, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 261-263, 1994, (Call Number: (D)). @article{RN23590,
title = {John Rawls: bibliografi},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {1994},
date = {1994-01-01},
journal = {Norsk Statsvitenskapelig tidsskrift},
volume = {10},
number = {2},
pages = {261-263},
note = {Call Number: (D)},
keywords = {John Rawls},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: Om Rawls. 1991, (Institutt for sammenlignende politikk, Universitetet i Bergen Bergen). @misc{RN55173,
title = {Om Rawls},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {1991},
date = {1991-11-01},
urldate = {1991-11-01},
publisher = {Institutt for sammenlignende politikk, Universitetet i Bergen},
note = {Institutt for sammenlignende politikk, Universitetet i Bergen Bergen},
keywords = {John Rawls, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: The ethics of deception in negotiation. 1990, (Medium Designator: Paper submitted for publication
Call Number: (A)). @unpublished{RN5390,
title = {The ethics of deception in negotiation},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {1990},
date = {1990-01-01},
abstract = {Addresses a topic often discussed in the literature of negotiation technique. I argue that strategic misrepresentations about one's interests, plans and bargaining set is not morally objectionable as part of professional negotiating practices -- though often unnecessary and sometimes unwise.},
note = {Medium Designator: Paper submitted for publication
Call Number: (A)},
keywords = {John Rawls},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {unpublished}
}
Addresses a topic often discussed in the literature of negotiation technique. I argue that strategic misrepresentations about one’s interests, plans and bargaining set is not morally objectionable as part of professional negotiating practices — though often unnecessary and sometimes unwise. |
