Follesdal, Andreas: The European Court of Human Rights as a vaccine against Authoritarian Populist Practices. 2024, (Wissenschaftskolleg zu Berlin). @misc{RN55686,
title = {The European Court of Human Rights as a vaccine against Authoritarian Populist Practices},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2024},
date = {2024-01-01},
abstract = {After the Second World War, European governments committed themselves to constrain any future backsliding into totalitarianism. They therefore agreed to bind themselves – and their successor governments – to the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and to be reviewed by its Court (ECtHR).
Several populist and authoritarian practices and governments in Europe over the last 20 years lead us to question whether the ECtHR is well-enough designed. In particular, how can it be improved as a vaccine against current movements against the rule of law, democracy, and human rights?},
note = {Wissenschaftskolleg zu Berlin},
keywords = {European Court of Human Rights, Margin of Appreciation, Policy advice, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
After the Second World War, European governments committed themselves to constrain any future backsliding into totalitarianism. They therefore agreed to bind themselves – and their successor governments – to the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and to be reviewed by its Court (ECtHR).
Several populist and authoritarian practices and governments in Europe over the last 20 years lead us to question whether the ECtHR is well-enough designed. In particular, how can it be improved as a vaccine against current movements against the rule of law, democracy, and human rights? |
Follesdal, Andreas: In defense of deference: International human rights as standards of review. In: Journal of Social Philosophy, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 526-547, 2023. @article{RN52180,
title = {In defense of deference: International human rights as standards of review},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
doi = {10.1111/josp.12449},
year = {2023},
date = {2023-01-01},
journal = {Journal of Social Philosophy},
volume = {54},
number = {4},
pages = {526-547},
abstract = {Member states of the Council of Europe subject themselves to judicial human rights review by the European Court of Human Rights. That Court in turn defers sometimes to the judgments of domestic courts about compliance, granting them a margin of discretion, more so when it sees a European consensus. This complex practice can be justified based on arguments about comparative epistemic expertise, respect for democratic decision making, and the need to avoid undue judicial discretion – juristocracy. While this account supports the general practice, it points to certain weaknesses and areas of improvement: the rules to nominate and elect judges and members of the Registry of the Court, the doctrine of the margin of appreciation, and the rationales for a European consensus.},
keywords = {European Consensus, European Court of Human Rights, Human Rights, Margin of Appreciation},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Member states of the Council of Europe subject themselves to judicial human rights review by the European Court of Human Rights. That Court in turn defers sometimes to the judgments of domestic courts about compliance, granting them a margin of discretion, more so when it sees a European consensus. This complex practice can be justified based on arguments about comparative epistemic expertise, respect for democratic decision making, and the need to avoid undue judicial discretion – juristocracy. While this account supports the general practice, it points to certain weaknesses and areas of improvement: the rules to nominate and elect judges and members of the Registry of the Court, the doctrine of the margin of appreciation, and the rationales for a European consensus. |
Follesdal, Andreas: The ECtHR responding to populism. 2022, (PluriCourts Seminar with President of the European Court of Human Rights, Robert Spano Oslo). @misc{RN54414,
title = {The ECtHR responding to populism},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-05-01},
publisher = {PluriCourts Seminar with President of the European Court of Human Rights, Robert Spano},
note = {PluriCourts Seminar with President of the European Court of Human Rights, Robert Spano Oslo},
keywords = {European Court of Human Rights, Human Rights, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: ECtHR – Margin, Consensus. 2021, (Glasgow University The European Court of Human Rights and the Theoretical Crisis of Human Rights Research Workshop Glasgow). @misc{RN54429,
title = {ECtHR – Margin, Consensus},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2021},
date = {2021-09-01},
publisher = {Glasgow University The European Court of Human Rights and the Theoretical Crisis of Human Rights Research Workshop},
note = {Glasgow University The European Court of Human Rights and the Theoretical Crisis of Human Rights Research Workshop Glasgow},
keywords = {European Court of Human Rights, Human Rights, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: [No title]. 2018, (The European Court of Human Rights and PluriCourts Workshop Strasbourg). @misc{RN54477,
title = {[No title]},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-09-01},
publisher = {The European Court of Human Rights and PluriCourts Workshop},
note = {The European Court of Human Rights and PluriCourts Workshop Strasbourg},
keywords = {European Court of Human Rights, Human Rights, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Better signposts or better walking sticks? How to improve the Emerging European Consensus doctrine of the European Court of Human Rights – and Why?. 2018, (PluriCourts Seminar Oslo). @misc{RN54496,
title = {Better signposts or better walking sticks? How to improve the Emerging European Consensus doctrine of the European Court of Human Rights - and Why?},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-02-01},
publisher = {PluriCourts Seminar},
note = {PluriCourts Seminar Oslo},
keywords = {European Consensus, European Court of Human Rights, Human Rights, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Improving the European Consensus Doctrine: A Better Signpost, Not a Better Walking Stick. 2018, (European Court of Human Rights Workshop Strasbourg). @misc{RN54498,
title = {Improving the European Consensus Doctrine: A Better Signpost, Not a Better Walking Stick},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-02-01},
publisher = {European Court of Human Rights Workshop},
note = {European Court of Human Rights Workshop Strasbourg},
keywords = {European Consensus, European Court of Human Rights, Human Rights, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: The bias of the European Court of Human Rights against Economic and Social Human Rights: a Modest Defense. 2017, (Venice Academy on Human Rights PhD course Venice). @misc{RN54507,
title = {The bias of the European Court of Human Rights against Economic and Social Human Rights: a Modest Defense},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-07-01},
publisher = {Venice Academy on Human Rights PhD course},
note = {Venice Academy on Human Rights PhD course Venice},
keywords = {European Court of Human Rights, Human Rights, PhD Course, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: A Better Signpost or a Better Walking Stick? How to Improve the Emerging European Consensus Doctrine and Why Bother?”. 2017, (Pompeu Fabra University Conference on the Legal Philosophy of Global Constitutionalism Barcelona). @misc{RN54511,
title = {A Better Signpost or a Better Walking Stick? How to Improve the Emerging European Consensus Doctrine and Why Bother?”},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-06-01},
publisher = {Pompeu Fabra University Conference on the Legal Philosophy of Global Constitutionalism},
note = {Pompeu Fabra University Conference on the Legal Philosophy of Global Constitutionalism Barcelona},
keywords = {European Consensus, European Court of Human Rights, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Saul, Matthew; Follesdal, Andreas; Ulfstein, Geir: The International Human Rights Judiciary and National Parliaments: Europe and Beyond. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2017, ISBN: 9781107183742. @book{RN52622,
title = {The International Human Rights Judiciary and National Parliaments: Europe and Beyond},
author = {Matthew Saul and Andreas Follesdal and Geir Ulfstein},
url = {https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/international-human-rights-judiciary-and-national-parliaments/B966B42C8F277F125FDC5DFE52EF18D5},
doi = {DOI: 10.1017/9781316874820},
isbn = {9781107183742},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-01-01},
publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
address = {Cambridge},
series = {Studies on Human Rights Conventions},
abstract = {The emerging international human rights judiciary (IHRJ) threatens national democratic processes and 'hollows out' the scope of domestic and democratic decision-making, some argue. This new analysis confronts this head on by examining the interplay between national parliaments and the IHRJ, proposing that it advances parliament's efforts. Taking Europe and the European Court of Human Rights as its focus - drawing on theory, doctrine and practice - the authors answer a series of key questions. What role should parliaments play in realising human rights? Which factors influence the effects of the IHRJ on national parliaments' efforts? How can the IHRJ adjust its influence on parliamentary process? And what triggers the backlash against the IHRJ from parliaments and when? Here, the authors lay foundations for better informed scholarship and legal practice in the future, as well as a better understanding of how to improve the effectiveness and validity of the IHRJ.},
keywords = {Edited books, European Court of Human Rights, Human Rights},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {book}
}
The emerging international human rights judiciary (IHRJ) threatens national democratic processes and ‘hollows out’ the scope of domestic and democratic decision-making, some argue. This new analysis confronts this head on by examining the interplay between national parliaments and the IHRJ, proposing that it advances parliament’s efforts. Taking Europe and the European Court of Human Rights as its focus – drawing on theory, doctrine and practice – the authors answer a series of key questions. What role should parliaments play in realising human rights? Which factors influence the effects of the IHRJ on national parliaments’ efforts? How can the IHRJ adjust its influence on parliamentary process? And what triggers the backlash against the IHRJ from parliaments and when? Here, the authors lay foundations for better informed scholarship and legal practice in the future, as well as a better understanding of how to improve the effectiveness and validity of the IHRJ. |
Follesdal, Andreas: Regional Human Rights Courts: protecting human rights or respecting state sovereignty – or both? The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine of the European Court of Human Rights as a model. 2016, (Bangkok Winter School on Human Rights, German-Southeast Asian Center of Excellence for Public Policy and Good Governance (CPG), Bangkok). @misc{RN54528,
title = {Regional Human Rights Courts: protecting human rights or respecting state sovereignty - or both? The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine of the European Court of Human Rights as a model},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-10-01},
publisher = {German-Southeast Asian Center of Excellence for Public Policy and Good Governance (CPG), Bangkok Winter School on Human Right},
note = {Bangkok Winter School on Human Rights, German-Southeast Asian Center of Excellence for Public Policy and Good Governance (CPG), Bangkok},
keywords = {European Court of Human Rights, Human Rights, Margin of Appreciation, PhD Course, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: European Consensus – Cairns or Crutches?. 2016, (Workshop on European Consensus European University Institute EUI Florence). @misc{RN54534,
title = {European Consensus – Cairns or Crutches?},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-06-01},
publisher = {European University Institute EUI Workshop on European Consensus},
note = {Workshop on European Consensus European University Institute EUI Florence},
keywords = {European Consensus, European Court of Human Rights, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Not Cairns but Crutches: Emerging European consensus – why it should matter for the margin of appreciation, and how.. 2016, (iCourts Workshop on the Margin of Appreciation and Democracy Copenhagen). @misc{RN54541,
title = {Not Cairns but Crutches: Emerging European consensus – why it should matter for the margin of appreciation, and how.},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-04-01},
publisher = {iCourts Workshop on the Margin of Appreciation and Democracy},
note = {iCourts Workshop on the Margin of Appreciation and Democracy Copenhagen},
keywords = {European Consensus, European Court of Human Rights, Margin of Appreciation, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas; Tsereteli, Nino: The margin of appreciation in Europe and beyond – Special Issue. 2016. @book{RN50638,
title = {The margin of appreciation in Europe and beyond - Special Issue},
author = {Andreas Follesdal and Nino Tsereteli},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-01},
volume = {20},
series = {The International Journal of Human Rights},
abstract = {Is the margin of appreciation doctrine of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) a promising model of deference by a regional human rights court towards democratic states? Or does this doctrine amount to an abdication by such courts from their proper tasks of protecting human rights against violations by states? This special section contributes to the ongoing scholarly debate about the margin of appreciation doctrine, originally developed by the ECtHR. It also explores the emergence of similar doctrines of deference in human rights adjudication outside Europe. The four articles also raise issues relevant for a broader debate about legitimacy and effectiveness of international courts. The authors cover a number of courts, well-established as well as relatively young ones, operating in different legal and political contexts. It allows reflecting on common as well as courtspecific reasons for exercising or avoiding deference.},
keywords = {European Court of Human Rights, Human Rights, International courts, Margin of Appreciation, Special issues},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {book}
}
Is the margin of appreciation doctrine of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) a promising model of deference by a regional human rights court towards democratic states? Or does this doctrine amount to an abdication by such courts from their proper tasks of protecting human rights against violations by states? This special section contributes to the ongoing scholarly debate about the margin of appreciation doctrine, originally developed by the ECtHR. It also explores the emergence of similar doctrines of deference in human rights adjudication outside Europe. The four articles also raise issues relevant for a broader debate about legitimacy and effectiveness of international courts. The authors cover a number of courts, well-established as well as relatively young ones, operating in different legal and political contexts. It allows reflecting on common as well as courtspecific reasons for exercising or avoiding deference. |
Follesdal, Andreas: Fragmentation and integration for better and worse: Assessing the doctrines of a Margin of Appreciation and of the Emerging European Consensus. 2015, (Conference on The Global Challenge of Human Rights Integration: Towards a User’s Perspective University of Ghent Ghent). @misc{RN54547,
title = {Fragmentation and integration for better and worse: Assessing the doctrines of a Margin of Appreciation and of the Emerging European Consensus},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-12-01},
publisher = {University of Ghent Conference on The Global Challenge of Human Rights Integration: Towards a User's Perspective},
note = {Conference on The Global Challenge of Human Rights Integration: Towards a User's Perspective University of Ghent Ghent},
keywords = {European Consensus, European Court of Human Rights, Human Rights, Margin of Appreciation, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: The Soul of Europe in the Balance Supremacy of the European Court of Human Rights or the Court of Justice of the European Union – what is at stake?. 2015, (Arctic University of Norway Workshop Tromsø). @misc{RN54553,
title = {The Soul of Europe in the Balance Supremacy of the European Court of Human Rights or the Court of Justice of the European Union – what is at stake?},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-11-01},
publisher = {Arctic University of Norway Workshop},
note = {Arctic University of Norway Workshop Tromsø},
keywords = {European Court of Human Rights, Human Rights, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Does The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine Benefit or Hinder the ECtHR’s Contribution to Democratic Transitions?. 2015, (PluriCourts and Koc University Workshop on The European Court of Human Rights: Promoter or Predator of Democratic Transitions? Istanbul). @misc{RN54559,
title = {Does The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine Benefit or Hinder the ECtHR's Contribution to Democratic Transitions?},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-09-01},
publisher = {PluriCourts and Koc University Workshop on The European Court of Human Rights: Promoter or Predator of Democratic Transitions?},
note = {PluriCourts and Koc University Workshop on The European Court of Human Rights: Promoter or Predator of Democratic Transitions? Istanbul},
keywords = {European Court of Human Rights, Human Rights, Margin of Appreciation, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Brighton and Beyond: Backlashes against the European Court of Human Rights – and how to respond’. 2015, (Venice Academy on Human Rights PhD Course Venice). @misc{RN54565,
title = {Brighton and Beyond: Backlashes against the European Court of Human Rights - and how to respond'},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-07-01},
publisher = {Venice Academy on Human Rights PhD Course},
note = {Venice Academy on Human Rights PhD Course Venice},
keywords = {European Court of Human Rights, Human Rights, PhD Course, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: How the European Court of Human Rights integrates and disintegrates communities and domestic courts. 2015, (Venice Academy on Human Rights PhD Course Venice). @misc{RN54566,
title = {How the European Court of Human Rights integrates and disintegrates communities and domestic courts},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-07-01},
publisher = {Venice Academy on Human Rights PhD Course},
note = {Venice Academy on Human Rights PhD Course Venice},
keywords = {European Court of Human Rights, Human Rights, PhD Course, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: The European Court of Human Rights: Between Scylla and Charybdis? Does subsidiarity and the margin of appreciation help the Court protect international human rights and respect sovereignty – or neither?. 2015, (University of Leuven Seminar on Sovereignty, Belgium). @misc{RN54576,
title = {The European Court of Human Rights: Between Scylla and Charybdis? Does subsidiarity and the margin of appreciation help the Court protect international human rights and respect sovereignty - or neither?},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-03-01},
publisher = {University of Leuven Seminar on Sovereignty,},
note = {University of Leuven Seminar on Sovereignty, Belgium},
keywords = {European Court of Human Rights, Human Rights, Margin of Appreciation, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: The Legitimation Strategies of the European Court of Human Rights. 2015, (ECPR Workshop on The Quest for Legitimacy in World Politics – International Organizations’ Self-Legitimations” Warsaw). @misc{RN54575,
title = {The Legitimation Strategies of the European Court of Human Rights},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-03-01},
publisher = {ECPR Workshop on The Quest for Legitimacy in World Politics – International Organizations’ Self-Legitimations”},
note = {ECPR Workshop on The Quest for Legitimacy in World Politics – International Organizations’ Self-Legitimations” Warsaw},
keywords = {European Court of Human Rights, Human Rights, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: The European Court of Human Rights: Between Scylla and Charybdis? Does subsidiarity and the margin of appreciation help the Court protect international human rights and respect sovereignty – or neither?. 2015, (Queen Mary University Conference on Transnational federalism London). @misc{RN54582,
title = {The European Court of Human Rights: Between Scylla and Charybdis? Does subsidiarity and the margin of appreciation help the Court protect international human rights and respect sovereignty - or neither?},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-02-01},
publisher = {Queen Mary University Conference on Transnational federalism},
note = {Queen Mary University Conference on Transnational federalism London},
keywords = {European Court of Human Rights, federalism, Human Rights, Margin of Appreciation, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: How the European Court of Human Rights enhances democracy – a defense’ The Berlin Workshop, Democracy programme UiO. 2014, (Oslo). @misc{RN54588,
title = {How the European Court of Human Rights enhances democracy - a defense' The Berlin Workshop, Democracy programme UiO},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-11-01},
note = {Oslo},
keywords = {European Court of Human Rights, Human Rights, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: The Principle of Subsidiarity and the Margin of Appreciation Doctrine of the European Court of Human Rights. 2014, (German-Southeast Asian Center for Public Policy and Good Governance Winter Course on Human Rights Bangkok). @misc{RN54585,
title = {The Principle of Subsidiarity and the Margin of Appreciation Doctrine of the European Court of Human Rights},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-11-01},
publisher = {German-Southeast Asian Center for Public Policy and Good Governance Winter Course on Human Rights},
note = {German-Southeast Asian Center for Public Policy and Good Governance Winter Course on Human Rights Bangkok},
keywords = {European Court of Human Rights, Human Rights, Margin of Appreciation, PhD Course, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Subsidiarity and the European Court of Human Rights: respecting self governance and protecting human rights – or neither?. 2014, (Hertie School of Governance Berlin). @misc{RN54596,
title = {Subsidiarity and the European Court of Human Rights: respecting self governance and protecting human rights – or neither?},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-06-01},
publisher = {Hertie School of Governance},
note = {Hertie School of Governance Berlin},
keywords = {European Court of Human Rights, Human Rights, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Does the margin of appreciation reduce the democratic deficit of the European Court of Human Rights?”. 2014, (Prague). @misc{RN54599,
title = {Does the margin of appreciation reduce the democratic deficit of the European Court of Human Rights?”},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-05-01},
note = {Prague},
keywords = {European Court of Human Rights, Human Rights, Margin of Appreciation, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Subsidiarity to the Rescue for the European Court of Human Rights? Resolving tensions between the Margin of Appreciation and Human Rights Protection. 2014, (University of Luxembourg Workshop on Philosophical Foundations of Federalism Luxembourg). @misc{RN54601,
title = {Subsidiarity to the Rescue for the European Court of Human Rights? Resolving tensions between the Margin of Appreciation and Human Rights Protection},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-05-01},
publisher = {University of Luxembourg Workshop on Philosophical Foundations of Federalism},
note = {University of Luxembourg Workshop on Philosophical Foundations of Federalism Luxembourg},
keywords = {European Court of Human Rights, federalism, Human Rights, Margin of Appreciation, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: [No title]. 2014, (PluriCourts and Council of Europe Accountability of the European Court of Human Rights Conference Oslo). @misc{RN54604,
title = {[No title]},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-04-01},
publisher = {PluriCourts and Council of Europe Accountability of the European Court of Human Rights Conference},
note = {PluriCourts and Council of Europe Accountability of the European Court of Human Rights Conference Oslo},
keywords = {European Court of Human Rights, Human Rights, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Judicial Cosmopolitanism: the Case of the Progressive Interpretations by the European Court of Human Rights –. 2014, (PluriCourts Workshop Oslo). @misc{RN54607,
title = {Judicial Cosmopolitanism: the Case of the Progressive Interpretations by the European Court of Human Rights –},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-03-01},
publisher = {PluriCourts Workshop},
note = {PluriCourts Workshop Oslo},
keywords = {European Court of Human Rights, Human Rights, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Appreciating the Margin of Appreciation in the European Court of Human Rights. 2014, (PluriCourts Workshop on Margin of Appreciation Paris). @misc{RN54608,
title = {Appreciating the Margin of Appreciation in the European Court of Human Rights},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-02-01},
publisher = {PluriCourts Workshop on Margin of Appreciation},
note = {PluriCourts Workshop on Margin of Appreciation Paris},
keywords = {European Court of Human Rights, Human Rights, Margin of Appreciation, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Religion and the State – the European Court of Human Rights and the ‘Lautsi’ case about crucifixes in Italian class rooms. 2013, (Arctic University of Norway Tromsø). @misc{RN54611,
title = {Religion and the State – the European Court of Human Rights and the ‘Lautsi' case about crucifixes in Italian class rooms},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2013},
date = {2013-12-01},
publisher = {Arctic University of Norway},
note = {Arctic University of Norway Tromsø},
keywords = {European Court of Human Rights, Human Rights, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Religion and the State – the European Court of Human Rights and the ‘Lautsi’ case about crucifixes in Italian class rooms. 2013, (MultiRights). @misc{RN54613,
title = {Religion and the State – the European Court of Human Rights and the ‘Lautsi' case about crucifixes in Italian class rooms},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2013},
date = {2013-00-01},
publisher = {MultiRights},
note = {MultiRights},
keywords = {European Court of Human Rights, Human Rights, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: International judicial review of human rights: Legitimate and democratic? – the case of the European Court of Human Rights. 2009, (Turku/Åbo). @misc{RN54735,
title = {International judicial review of human rights: Legitimate and democratic? - the case of the European Court of Human Rights},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2009},
date = {2009-12-01},
note = {Turku/Åbo},
keywords = {European Court of Human Rights, Human Rights, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: [No title]. 2009, (European Court of Human Rights workshop Copenhagen). @misc{RN54705,
title = {[No title]},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2009},
date = {2009-01-01},
publisher = {European Court of Human Rights workshop},
note = {European Court of Human Rights workshop Copenhagen},
keywords = {European Court of Human Rights, Human Rights, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|