Føllesdal, Andreas: Er nasjonalstaten truet?. 1999, (Europeisk Ungdom Europaseminaret Oslo). @misc{RN55048,
title = {Er nasjonalstaten truet?},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {1999},
date = {1999-09-01},
publisher = {Europeisk Ungdom Europaseminaret},
note = {Europeisk Ungdom Europaseminaret Oslo},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: EU som forskningstema i politisk filosofi. 1999, (Filosofisk institutt, UiO Lunchseminar Oslo). @misc{RN55047,
title = {EU som forskningstema i politisk filosofi},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {1999},
date = {1999-09-01},
publisher = {Filosofisk institutt, UiO Lunchseminar},
note = {Filosofisk institutt, UiO Lunchseminar Oslo},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Just European Patriotism?. 1999, (Freie Universität Berlin). @misc{RN55044,
title = {Just European Patriotism?},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {1999},
date = {1999-06-01},
publisher = {Freie Universität},
note = {Freie Universität Berlin},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Just European Patriotism?. 1999, (Centre d’Etudes de Relations Internationales, Science Po – CERI Conference on Democracy in Europe, Paris). @misc{RN55045,
title = {Just European Patriotism?},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {1999},
date = {1999-06-01},
publisher = {Centre d'Etudes de Relations Internationales, Science Po - CERI Conference on Democracy in Europe,},
note = {Centre d'Etudes de Relations Internationales, Science Po - CERI Conference on Democracy in Europe, Paris},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Rethinking democracy for Multi-level European Governance. 1999, (Harvard University Boston Working Group on European Integration and Democracy, Cambridge, MA). @misc{RN55046,
title = {Rethinking democracy for Multi-level European Governance},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {1999},
date = {1999-06-01},
publisher = {Harvard University Boston Working Group on European Integration and Democracy,},
note = {Harvard University Boston Working Group on European Integration and Democracy, Cambridge, MA},
keywords = {Democratic theory, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: The Units of Europe: Autonomous or Equal?. 1999, (Humboldt Universität Berlin). @misc{RN55043,
title = {The Units of Europe: Autonomous or Equal?},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {1999},
date = {1999-06-01},
publisher = {Humboldt Universität},
note = {Humboldt Universität Berlin},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: Fellesskapsverdier: filosofiske perspektiver. 1999, (Motverdikommisjonen, UiO Konferanse Oslo). @misc{RN55042,
title = {Fellesskapsverdier: filosofiske perspektiver},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {1999},
date = {1999-04-01},
publisher = {Motverdikommisjonen, UiO Konferanse},
note = {Motverdikommisjonen, UiO Konferanse Oslo},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: Likeverd på anbud? Kan markedet sikre likhet i morgendagens velferdsstat?. 1999, (Velferd og Samfunn-programmet Avslutningskonferanse Oslo). @misc{RN55041,
title = {Likeverd på anbud? Kan markedet sikre likhet i morgendagens velferdsstat?},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {1999},
date = {1999-04-01},
publisher = {Velferd og Samfunn-programmet Avslutningskonferanse},
note = {Velferd og Samfunn-programmet Avslutningskonferanse Oslo},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: Makt, Rawls og rettigheter. 1999, (Makt- og demokratiutredningen, UiO seminar Oslo). @misc{RN55040,
title = {Makt, Rawls og rettigheter},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {1999},
date = {1999-04-01},
publisher = {Makt- og demokratiutredningen, UiO seminar},
note = {Makt- og demokratiutredningen, UiO seminar Oslo},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: Business and Ethics in an Open World. 1999, (Norges Handelshøyskole Bergen). @misc{RN55032,
title = {Business and Ethics in an Open World},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {1999},
date = {1999-03-01},
publisher = {Norges Handelshøyskole},
note = {Norges Handelshøyskole Bergen},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: Krav om fritak fra Kristendomskunnskap med religions- og livssynsorientering – perspektiver fra politisk filosofi. 1999, (Oslo byrett sak mellom Human-etisk forbund og Staten ved KUF Oslo). @misc{RN55037,
title = {Krav om fritak fra Kristendomskunnskap med religions- og livssynsorientering - perspektiver fra politisk filosofi},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {1999},
date = {1999-03-01},
publisher = {Oslo byrett sak mellom Human-etisk forbund og Staten ved KUF},
note = {Oslo byrett sak mellom Human-etisk forbund og Staten ved KUF Oslo},
keywords = {Service, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: Om rapporten om snusk i EU-kommisjonen. 1999, (Dagnytt 18.). @misc{RN55033,
title = {Om rapporten om snusk i EU-kommisjonen},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {1999},
date = {1999-03-01},
publisher = {Dagnytt 18.},
note = {Dagnytt 18.},
keywords = {Service, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: Om rapporten om snusk i EU-kommisjonen. 1999, (Dagsnytt). @misc{RN55034,
title = {Om rapporten om snusk i EU-kommisjonen},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {1999},
date = {1999-03-01},
publisher = {Dagsnytt},
note = {Dagsnytt},
keywords = {Service, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: Om rapporten om snusk i EU-kommisjonen. 1999, (Aftenposten Morgen). @misc{RN55036,
title = {Om rapporten om snusk i EU-kommisjonen},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {1999},
date = {1999-03-01},
publisher = {Aftenposten Morgen},
note = {Aftenposten Morgen},
keywords = {Service, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: Om snusk i EU-kommisjonen. 1999, (TV2 21-nyhetene.). @misc{RN55035,
title = {Om snusk i EU-kommisjonen},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {1999},
date = {1999-03-01},
publisher = {TV2 21-nyhetene.},
note = {TV2 21-nyhetene.},
keywords = {Service, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: How nationality matters: a Liberal Contractualist sketch. 1999, (ECPR conference Panel on International Distributive Justice: Cosmopolitanism and its Critics ECPR, Mannheim. /ARENA/forskdok/ natlity.doc Mannheim). @misc{RN55039,
title = {How nationality matters: a Liberal Contractualist sketch},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {1999},
date = {1999-03-01},
publisher = {ECPR conference Panel on International Distributive Justice: Cosmopolitanism and its Critics ECPR, Mannheim. /ARENA/forskdok/ natlity.doc},
note = {ECPR conference Panel on International Distributive Justice: Cosmopolitanism and its Critics ECPR, Mannheim. /ARENA/forskdok/ natlity.doc Mannheim},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: Genteknologi: grotesk eller genial?. 1999, (Miljøverndepartementet, Oslo Oslo). @misc{RN55030,
title = {Genteknologi: grotesk eller genial?},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {1999},
date = {1999-02-01},
publisher = {Miljøverndepartementet, Oslo},
note = {Miljøverndepartementet, Oslo Oslo},
keywords = {Service, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: Menneskerettigheter og ulike verdisyn: vestlige mot asiatiske verdier?. 1999, (Det Kongelige Norske Videnskabers Selskab Gunerusforelesningene 1999 Trondheim). @misc{RN55031,
title = {Menneskerettigheter og ulike verdisyn: vestlige mot asiatiske verdier?},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {1999},
date = {1999-02-01},
publisher = {Det Kongelige Norske Videnskabers Selskab Gunerusforelesningene 1999},
note = {Det Kongelige Norske Videnskabers Selskab Gunerusforelesningene 1999 Trondheim},
keywords = {Human Rights, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: Om statsborgerskap. 1999, (Søndagsposten NRK P2). @misc{RN55029,
title = {Om statsborgerskap},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {1999},
date = {1999-02-01},
publisher = {Søndagsposten NRK P2},
note = {Søndagsposten NRK P2},
keywords = {Service, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: Hva slags likhet? Om Sens begrep funksjoner og mulighetsrom. 1999, (Senter for vitskapsteori Bergen). @misc{RN55028,
title = {Hva slags likhet? Om Sens begrep funksjoner og mulighetsrom},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {1999},
date = {1999-01-01},
publisher = {Senter for vitskapsteori},
note = {Senter for vitskapsteori Bergen},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: Hvorfor likhet, hva slags likhet? Normative føringer på forskning om makt og demokrati (Why Equality – Equality of What? Normative Guidelines for Research on Power and Democracy). In: Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 123-147, 1999. @article{RN22330,
title = {Hvorfor likhet, hva slags likhet? Normative føringer på forskning om makt og demokrati (Why Equality - Equality of What? Normative Guidelines for Research on Power and Democracy)},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {1999},
date = {1999-01-01},
journal = {Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning},
volume = {24},
number = {2},
pages = {123-147},
abstract = {The article explores the ideal of equality said to underpin the Scandinavian welfare states. Equality is not one, but multiple ideals. There are at least five reasons for equality of various kinds, with important different implications for choice of quality of life measures, for democratic arrangements, and for standards of legitimate distribution of power within a society. Most reasons for equality are best regarded as arguments against certain large inequalities of particular kinds, to prevent domination and procedural mishaps. The best reason for securing equal shares is offered in John Rawls' theory Justice as Fairness, focusing on Social Primary Goods - civil and political rights, income and wealth, and fair equality of opportunity. These arguments for limiting inequality underscore the need for research on quality of life. The article pursues some implications for choice of indicators, focusing on the added constraint of pervasive pluralism of conceptions of the good. Finally, some implications are presented with regard to the study of democracy and power. Democracy is important for securing some forms of equality and for a legitimate distribution of many benefits and burdens generally. But some interpretations of democracy, such as of participatory democracy, must be revised.},
keywords = {John Rawls},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
The article explores the ideal of equality said to underpin the Scandinavian welfare states. Equality is not one, but multiple ideals. There are at least five reasons for equality of various kinds, with important different implications for choice of quality of life measures, for democratic arrangements, and for standards of legitimate distribution of power within a society. Most reasons for equality are best regarded as arguments against certain large inequalities of particular kinds, to prevent domination and procedural mishaps. The best reason for securing equal shares is offered in John Rawls’ theory Justice as Fairness, focusing on Social Primary Goods – civil and political rights, income and wealth, and fair equality of opportunity. These arguments for limiting inequality underscore the need for research on quality of life. The article pursues some implications for choice of indicators, focusing on the added constraint of pervasive pluralism of conceptions of the good. Finally, some implications are presented with regard to the study of democracy and power. Democracy is important for securing some forms of equality and for a legitimate distribution of many benefits and burdens generally. But some interpretations of democracy, such as of participatory democracy, must be revised. |
Føllesdal, Andreas: Makt i John Rawls’ teori om Rettferdighet som rimelighet. In: Engelstad, Fredrik (Ed.): Maktbegrepet: Teori og kritikk, vol. Makt- og demokratiutredningen, pp. 262-290, AdNotam Gyldendal, Oslo, 1999. @inbook{RN23400,
title = {Makt i John Rawls' teori om Rettferdighet som rimelighet},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
editor = {Fredrik Engelstad},
year = {1999},
date = {1999-01-01},
booktitle = {Maktbegrepet: Teori og kritikk},
volume = {Makt- og demokratiutredningen},
pages = {262-290},
publisher = {AdNotam Gyldendal},
address = {Oslo},
abstract = {Del 1 skisserer antagelser om de grunnleggende samfunnsinstitusjonene og livssynsmangfoldet, for å forstå hvorfor teorien har dette som tema og premiss. Rawls' teori Rettferdighet som rimelighet legger stor vekt på institusjonenes rolle: de preger våre verdier og forventninger på fundamentale måter, og påvirker maktfordelingen oss imellom i samfunnet. Om institusjonene dermed utøver 'makt' er et definisjonsspørsmål. Del 2 skisserer enkelte sider ved Rawls' teori, og del 3 ser kort på hvordan samfunnsinstitusjonenes betydning forklarer den sterke likhetorienteringen i rettferdighetsprinsippene. Del 4 peker på noen aspekter av teorien av betydning for forståelse av maktbegrepet, og del 5 skisserer noen konsekvenser for demokratiske ordninger. Del 6 nevner noen hovedinnvendinger mot teorien.},
keywords = {John Rawls},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
Del 1 skisserer antagelser om de grunnleggende samfunnsinstitusjonene og livssynsmangfoldet, for å forstå hvorfor teorien har dette som tema og premiss. Rawls’ teori Rettferdighet som rimelighet legger stor vekt på institusjonenes rolle: de preger våre verdier og forventninger på fundamentale måter, og påvirker maktfordelingen oss imellom i samfunnet. Om institusjonene dermed utøver ‘makt’ er et definisjonsspørsmål. Del 2 skisserer enkelte sider ved Rawls’ teori, og del 3 ser kort på hvordan samfunnsinstitusjonenes betydning forklarer den sterke likhetorienteringen i rettferdighetsprinsippene. Del 4 peker på noen aspekter av teorien av betydning for forståelse av maktbegrepet, og del 5 skisserer noen konsekvenser for demokratiske ordninger. Del 6 nevner noen hovedinnvendinger mot teorien. |
Follesdal, Andreas: Sustainable Development, State Sovereignty and International Justice. In: Lafferty, William M.; Langhelle, Oluf (Ed.): Sustainable development: On the aims of development and conditions of sustainability, pp. 70-83, Macmillan, Houndsmills, 1999. @inbook{RN24060,
title = {Sustainable Development, State Sovereignty and International Justice},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
editor = {William M. Lafferty and Oluf Langhelle},
url = {http://follesdal.net/ms/Follesdal-1999-sust-dev.rtf},
year = {1999},
date = {1999-01-01},
booktitle = {Sustainable development: On the aims of development and conditions of sustainability},
pages = {70-83},
publisher = {Macmillan},
address = {Houndsmills},
abstract = {The present paper seeks to elaborate and justify the priority of basic needs over environment and sovereignty. This thesis, the Primacy of Human Rights, holds that development strategies should secure the basic needs for today’s poor through respecting human rights - if necessary at the expense of protecting the environment. Moreover, such development strategies may require international aid with ties, contrary to traditional conceptions of state sovereignty.
Section 2 outlines aspects of a theory of justice providing a systematic perspective for addressing these concerns. Section 3 defends the Primacy of Human Rights for development strategies. Section 4 addresses the conflicts between human rights and development, while section 5 discusses conflicts regarding human rights and sovereignty. Industrialised countries have obligations towards developing countries if necessary for ecologically justifiable development strategies that also respect human rights. But international aid need not be unconditional: It may be necessary to influence internal conditions in developing countries through economic pressure. Section 6 reflects on some principled objections against the Primacy of Human Rights. We consider an alternative, the Primacy of the Environment, sometimes argued by deep ecologists, which holds that environmental concerns should be of primary importance in the choice of development strategies, and if necessary at the expense of today’s poor. A complete rebuttal of this view is beyond the scope of this paper. The aim is rather to identify the areas of disagreement.},
keywords = {Human Rights},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
The present paper seeks to elaborate and justify the priority of basic needs over environment and sovereignty. This thesis, the Primacy of Human Rights, holds that development strategies should secure the basic needs for today’s poor through respecting human rights – if necessary at the expense of protecting the environment. Moreover, such development strategies may require international aid with ties, contrary to traditional conceptions of state sovereignty.
Section 2 outlines aspects of a theory of justice providing a systematic perspective for addressing these concerns. Section 3 defends the Primacy of Human Rights for development strategies. Section 4 addresses the conflicts between human rights and development, while section 5 discusses conflicts regarding human rights and sovereignty. Industrialised countries have obligations towards developing countries if necessary for ecologically justifiable development strategies that also respect human rights. But international aid need not be unconditional: It may be necessary to influence internal conditions in developing countries through economic pressure. Section 6 reflects on some principled objections against the Primacy of Human Rights. We consider an alternative, the Primacy of the Environment, sometimes argued by deep ecologists, which holds that environmental concerns should be of primary importance in the choice of development strategies, and if necessary at the expense of today’s poor. A complete rebuttal of this view is beyond the scope of this paper. The aim is rather to identify the areas of disagreement. |
Føllesdal, Andreas: Forhandlinger og etikk. 1998, (Norges Hovedorganisasjon – NHO Oslo). @misc{RN55074,
title = {Forhandlinger og etikk},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {1998},
date = {1998-12-01},
publisher = {Norges Hovedorganisasjon - NHO},
note = {Norges Hovedorganisasjon - NHO Oslo},
keywords = {Consultancy, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Distributive Justice: International and European. 1998, (British International Studies Association Conference Brighton). @misc{RN55073,
title = {Distributive Justice: International and European},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {1998},
date = {1998-12-01},
publisher = {British International Studies Association Conference},
note = {British International Studies Association Conference Brighton},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: Globalisering og demokrati. 1998, (Europabevegelsen 9. november konferansen Oslo). @misc{RN55071,
title = {Globalisering og demokrati},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {1998},
date = {1998-11-01},
publisher = {Europabevegelsen 9. november konferansen},
note = {Europabevegelsen 9. november konferansen Oslo},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: The Philosopher as Coach: Expertise and Expectations of Ethics Consultants. 1998, (Max Planck Society Schoessmann Seminar on the Expert in Modern Societies: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives. Berlin). @misc{RN55072,
title = {The Philosopher as Coach: Expertise and Expectations of Ethics Consultants},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {1998},
date = {1998-11-01},
publisher = {Max Planck Society Schoessmann Seminar on the Expert in Modern Societies: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives.},
note = {Max Planck Society Schoessmann Seminar on the Expert in Modern Societies: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives. Berlin},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Establishing a moral unity in plurinational context: can the EU ever become anything else than a modus vivendi?. 1998, (University of Bergen Comparative politics conference: Human Rights in Modern Democracies Bergen). @misc{RN55070,
title = {Establishing a moral unity in plurinational context: can the EU ever become anything else than a modus vivendi?},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {1998},
date = {1998-10-01},
publisher = {University of Bergen Comparative politics conference: Human Rights in Modern Democracies},
note = {University of Bergen Comparative politics conference: Human Rights in Modern Democracies Bergen},
keywords = {Human Rights, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: Læring og likeverd: bør skolen sikre likhet?. 1998, (Fagkritisk dag, UiO). @misc{RN55069,
title = {Læring og likeverd: bør skolen sikre likhet?},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {1998},
date = {1998-09-01},
publisher = {Fagkritisk dag, UiO},
note = {Fagkritisk dag, UiO},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: Europeisk velferd – hva så?. 1998, (Oslo Studentfestival, UiO). @misc{RN55068,
title = {Europeisk velferd - hva så?},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {1998},
date = {1998-08-01},
publisher = {Oslo Studentfestival, UiO},
note = {Oslo Studentfestival, UiO},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: European Citizenship. 1998, (World Congress of Philosophy Panel Boston). @misc{RN55067,
title = {European Citizenship},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {1998},
date = {1998-08-01},
publisher = {World Congress of Philosophy Panel},
note = {World Congress of Philosophy Panel Boston},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Global Justice and democracy. 1998, (International Social Philosophy Conference North Adams, Mass.). @misc{RN55066,
title = {Global Justice and democracy},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {1998},
date = {1998-08-01},
publisher = {International Social Philosophy Conference},
note = {International Social Philosophy Conference North Adams, Mass.},
keywords = {Democratic theory, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Teknologene – hva gjør de seg til?. 1998, (Norske sivilingeniørers forening Oslo). @misc{RN55065,
title = {Teknologene - hva gjør de seg til?},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {1998},
date = {1998-06-01},
publisher = {Norske sivilingeniørers forening},
note = {Norske sivilingeniørers forening Oslo},
keywords = {Consultancy, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: Hva er etikk og hva er etiske handlinger?. 1998, (Fiskeridirektoratets ernæringsinstitutt Forskningsprogrammet Produksjon av laksefisk Bergen). @misc{RN55063,
title = {Hva er etikk og hva er etiske handlinger?},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {1998},
date = {1998-04-01},
publisher = {Fiskeridirektoratets ernæringsinstitutt Forskningsprogrammet Produksjon av laksefisk},
note = {Fiskeridirektoratets ernæringsinstitutt Forskningsprogrammet Produksjon av laksefisk Bergen},
keywords = {Consultancy, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: International Contractualist Justice: the Precarious Claims to Equal Shares. 1998, (UK Association for Legal and Social Philosophy Conference Reading). @misc{RN55062,
title = {International Contractualist Justice: the Precarious Claims to Equal Shares},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {1998},
date = {1998-04-01},
publisher = {UK Association for Legal and Social Philosophy Conference},
note = {UK Association for Legal and Social Philosophy Conference Reading},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: Rett og moral og advokatetikk. 1998, (Selmer Advokatfirma Beitostølen). @misc{RN55060,
title = {Rett og moral og advokatetikk},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {1998},
date = {1998-03-01},
publisher = {Selmer Advokatfirma},
note = {Selmer Advokatfirma Beitostølen},
keywords = {Consultancy, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Indigenous minorities – The shadow of injustice past. 1998, (ECPR Conference Warwick). @misc{RN55061,
title = {Indigenous minorities - The shadow of injustice past},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {1998},
date = {1998-03-01},
publisher = {ECPR Conference},
note = {ECPR Conference Warwick},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Third Country Nationals as Euro-citizens – the Case Defended. 1998, (European University Institute – EUI Conference on Migrants, Minorities and New Forms of Citizenship in the European Union. Florence). @misc{RN55059,
title = {Third Country Nationals as Euro-citizens - the Case Defended},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {1998},
date = {1998-03-01},
publisher = {European University Institute - EUI Conference on Migrants, Minorities and New Forms of Citizenship in the European Union.},
note = {European University Institute - EUI Conference on Migrants, Minorities and New Forms of Citizenship in the European Union. Florence},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Democracy and Subsidiarity. 1998, (Ledelse – organisasjon – styring LOS Konferanse). @misc{RN55058,
title = {Democracy and Subsidiarity},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {1998},
date = {1998-02-01},
publisher = {Ledelse - organisasjon - styring LOS Konferanse},
note = {Ledelse - organisasjon - styring LOS Konferanse},
keywords = {Democratic theory, Subsidiarity, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: The Principle of Subsidiarity: Alternative Interpretations and Justicifications. 1998, (: A Cross-National Assessment of the Implementation of Agenda 21 at the Local Level of Governance. A Concerted Action under EU Commission DGXII. Conference Sustainable Communities in Europe Oslo). @misc{RN55057,
title = {The Principle of Subsidiarity: Alternative Interpretations and Justicifications},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {1998},
date = {1998-02-01},
publisher = {: A Cross-National Assessment of the Implementation of Agenda 21 at the Local Level of Governance. A Concerted Action under EU Commission DGXII. Conference Sustainable Communities in Europe},
note = {: A Cross-National Assessment of the Implementation of Agenda 21 at the Local Level of Governance. A Concerted Action under EU Commission DGXII. Conference Sustainable Communities in Europe Oslo},
keywords = {Public policy, Subsidiarity, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: Hva slags likhet – hvorfor likhet? Normative føringer på forskning om makt og demokrati. 1998, (Norsk sosiologforening Sanderstølen). @misc{RN55056,
title = {Hva slags likhet - hvorfor likhet? Normative føringer på forskning om makt og demokrati},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {1998},
date = {1998-01-01},
publisher = {Norsk sosiologforening},
note = {Norsk sosiologforening Sanderstølen},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Five Theories of Subsidiarity: Features and Flaws. 1998, (Bremen). @misc{RN55055,
title = {Five Theories of Subsidiarity: Features and Flaws},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {1998},
date = {1998-01-01},
note = {Bremen},
keywords = {Subsidiarity, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: European Citizenship: Consensus and Challenges. 1997, (NorFA Conference: Europe: the third phase of democracy Ustedalen/Geilo.). @misc{RN55096,
title = {European Citizenship: Consensus and Challenges},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {1997},
date = {1997-12-01},
publisher = {NorFA Conference: Europe: the third phase of democracy},
note = {NorFA Conference: Europe: the third phase of democracy Ustedalen/Geilo.},
keywords = {Democratic theory, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: Teledemokrati: Den Store Samtalen eller Skurr på sperret linje?. 1997, (Kommunedata Oslo). @misc{RN55095,
title = {Teledemokrati: Den Store Samtalen eller Skurr på sperret linje?},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {1997},
date = {1997-11-01},
publisher = {Kommunedata},
note = {Kommunedata Oslo},
keywords = {Consultancy, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: European Citizenship. 1997, (ARENA Conference Oslo). @misc{RN55094,
title = {European Citizenship},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {1997},
date = {1997-11-01},
publisher = {ARENA Conference},
note = {ARENA Conference Oslo},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: Subsidiaritetsprinsippet. 1997, (ARENA Seminar Oslo). @misc{RN55092,
title = {Subsidiaritetsprinsippet},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {1997},
date = {1997-10-01},
publisher = {ARENA Seminar},
note = {ARENA Seminar Oslo},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Teledemokrati: Den Store Samtalen eller Skurr på sperret linje?. 1997, (Kommunenes sentralforbund – KS Drammen). @misc{RN55093,
title = {Teledemokrati: Den Store Samtalen eller Skurr på sperret linje?},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {1997},
date = {1997-10-01},
publisher = {Kommunenes sentralforbund - KS},
note = {Kommunenes sentralforbund - KS Drammen},
keywords = {Consultancy, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Culture and the Environment. 1997, (UNESCO Conference on Culture and Development Lillehammer). @misc{RN55089,
title = {Culture and the Environment},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {1997},
date = {1997-09-01},
publisher = {UNESCO Conference on Culture and Development},
note = {UNESCO Conference on Culture and Development Lillehammer},
keywords = {Climate, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: Stopper velferdsstaten og kvinnekamp ved landegrensen? Etikk og utenrikspolitikk. 1997, (UiO Ulandsseminaret Oslo). @misc{RN55090,
title = {Stopper velferdsstaten og kvinnekamp ved landegrensen? Etikk og utenrikspolitikk},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {1997},
date = {1997-08-01},
publisher = {UiO Ulandsseminaret},
note = {UiO Ulandsseminaret Oslo},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: Teledemokrati: Den Store Samtalen eller Skurr på sperret linje?. 1997, (Kommunenes sentralforbund – KS Oslo). @misc{RN55091,
title = {Teledemokrati: Den Store Samtalen eller Skurr på sperret linje?},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {1997},
date = {1997-08-01},
publisher = {Kommunenes sentralforbund - KS},
note = {Kommunenes sentralforbund - KS Oslo},
keywords = {Consultancy, Service, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Global Ethics, Democracy and Culture. 1997, (Workshop on Global Ethics, Senter for Utvikling og Miljø, UiO, Oslo). @misc{RN55088,
title = {Global Ethics, Democracy and Culture},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {1997},
date = {1997-08-01},
publisher = {Senter for Utvikling og Miljø, UiO Workshop on Global Ethic},
note = {Workshop on Global Ethics, Senter for Utvikling og Miljø, UiO, Oslo},
keywords = {Democratic theory, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: Råd eller Demokrati?. 1997, (LOS-Senteret Workshop om dialogiske råd Bergen). @misc{RN55087,
title = {Råd eller Demokrati?},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {1997},
date = {1997-06-01},
publisher = {LOS-Senteret Workshop om dialogiske råd},
note = {LOS-Senteret Workshop om dialogiske råd Bergen},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: Hvor går det grunnleggende skillet mellom plikt- og konsekvensetikk? Spørsmålet om evtanasi belyst ved et kontraktetisk perspektiv. 1997, (Høgskolen i Oslo, Avdeling for sykepleierutdanning. Etikkseminar Oslo). @misc{RN55086,
title = {Hvor går det grunnleggende skillet mellom plikt- og konsekvensetikk? Spørsmålet om evtanasi belyst ved et kontraktetisk perspektiv},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {1997},
date = {1997-05-01},
publisher = {Høgskolen i Oslo, Avdeling for sykepleierutdanning. Etikkseminar},
note = {Høgskolen i Oslo, Avdeling for sykepleierutdanning. Etikkseminar Oslo},
keywords = {Service, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: Velferdsstat og rettferdighet: Forskningstemaer. 1997, (Norges forskningsråd, Velferd og Samfunn Konferanse Oslo). @misc{RN55084,
title = {Velferdsstat og rettferdighet: Forskningstemaer},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {1997},
date = {1997-05-01},
publisher = {Norges forskningsråd, Velferd og Samfunn Konferanse},
note = {Norges forskningsråd, Velferd og Samfunn Konferanse Oslo},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Citizenship and Political Rights in the European Union: Consensus and Questions. 1997, (University of Vienna Vienna). @misc{RN55085,
title = {Citizenship and Political Rights in the European Union: Consensus and Questions},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {1997},
date = {1997-05-01},
publisher = {University of Vienna},
note = {University of Vienna Vienna},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Sustainable Development and Human Rights. 1997, (Senter for Utvikling og Miljø, UiO Oslo). @misc{RN55083,
title = {Sustainable Development and Human Rights},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {1997},
date = {1997-05-01},
publisher = {Senter for Utvikling og Miljø, UiO},
note = {Senter for Utvikling og Miljø, UiO Oslo},
keywords = {Climate, Human Rights, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: Om demokrati og føderale ordninger. 1997, (Institutt for statsvitenskap UiO Oslo). @misc{RN55081,
title = {Om demokrati og føderale ordninger},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {1997},
date = {1997-04-01},
publisher = {Institutt for statsvitenskap UiO},
note = {Institutt for statsvitenskap UiO Oslo},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Citizenship and political rights in the European Union. 1997, (ARENA Seminar Oslo). @misc{RN55080,
title = {Citizenship and political rights in the European Union},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {1997},
date = {1997-04-01},
publisher = {ARENA Seminar},
note = {ARENA Seminar Oslo},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: Demokratiets internasjonale forpliktelser. 1997, (UiO Oslo). @misc{RN55078,
title = {Demokratiets internasjonale forpliktelser},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {1997},
date = {1997-02-01},
publisher = {UiO},
note = {UiO Oslo},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: Grenser for likhet? Velferdsstatens internasjonale forpliktelser. 1997, (Diskusjonsgruppe i Kritisk Internasjonal Politisk Teori. Oslo). @misc{RN55079,
title = {Grenser for likhet? Velferdsstatens internasjonale forpliktelser},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {1997},
date = {1997-02-01},
publisher = {Diskusjonsgruppe i Kritisk Internasjonal Politisk Teori.},
note = {Diskusjonsgruppe i Kritisk Internasjonal Politisk Teori. Oslo},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: Etikk og forhandlinger. 1997, (Norges Landbrukshøyskole Ås). @misc{RN55075,
title = {Etikk og forhandlinger},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {1997},
date = {1997-01-01},
publisher = {Norges Landbrukshøyskole},
note = {Norges Landbrukshøyskole Ås},
keywords = {Consultancy, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Koslowski, Peter; Follesdal, Andreas: Restructuring the Welfare State: Theory and Practice of Social Policy. Springer Verlag, 1997. @book{RN13470,
title = {Restructuring the Welfare State: Theory and Practice of Social Policy},
author = {Peter Koslowski and Andreas Follesdal},
year = {1997},
date = {1997-01-01},
publisher = {Springer Verlag},
series = {Issues in Economic Ethics and Philosophy},
keywords = {Edited books},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {book}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: The standing of illiberal states: Stability and toleration in John Rawls’ “Law of Peoples”. In: Koller, P.; Puhl, K. (Ed.): Current Issues in Political Philosophy: Justice in Society and World Order, pp. 165-174, Verlag Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky, Vienna, 1997. @inbook{RN17020,
title = {The standing of illiberal states: Stability and toleration in John Rawls' "Law of Peoples"},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
editor = {P. Koller and K. Puhl},
url = {http://follesdal.net/ms/Follesdal-1997-lawpeopl.rtf},
year = {1997},
date = {1997-01-01},
booktitle = {Current Issues in Political Philosophy: Justice in Society and World Order},
pages = {165-174},
publisher = {Verlag Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky},
address = {Vienna},
series = {Schriftenreie der Wittgenstein-Gesellschaft vol. 24.},
abstract = {Based on "The Standing of States" 1996.
John Rawls' "Law of Peoples" (1993) extends the theory of Justice as Fairness to the relations between states. A satisfactory extension must alleviate worries about stability of the world order, as well as delimit the scope of toleration towards non-liberal states. These concerns are important, but the account of liberal toleration presented in '"Law of Peoples" fails to offer a satisfactory response. Moreover, it is incompatible with the normative individualism underpinning Rawls' approach regarding domestic justice. The Law of Peoples awards moral standing to some political communities, "hierarchical societies", which deny basic liberties and justify institutions by appeal to one comprehensive conception of the good. A more satisfactory alternative theory of justice for international relations justifies more extensive universal asprations and distributive implications. It is argued that this alternative theory of global justice is not unduly liberal, and does not threaten the stability of a just world order.},
keywords = {John Rawls},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
Based on “The Standing of States” 1996.
John Rawls’ “Law of Peoples” (1993) extends the theory of Justice as Fairness to the relations between states. A satisfactory extension must alleviate worries about stability of the world order, as well as delimit the scope of toleration towards non-liberal states. These concerns are important, but the account of liberal toleration presented in ‘”Law of Peoples” fails to offer a satisfactory response. Moreover, it is incompatible with the normative individualism underpinning Rawls’ approach regarding domestic justice. The Law of Peoples awards moral standing to some political communities, “hierarchical societies”, which deny basic liberties and justify institutions by appeal to one comprehensive conception of the good. A more satisfactory alternative theory of justice for international relations justifies more extensive universal asprations and distributive implications. It is argued that this alternative theory of global justice is not unduly liberal, and does not threaten the stability of a just world order. |
Follesdal, Andreas: The Cultural Rights of Minorities. 1997, (University of Exeter Exeter). @misc{RN55077,
title = {The Cultural Rights of Minorities},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {1997},
date = {1997-01-01},
publisher = {University of Exeter},
note = {University of Exeter Exeter},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Rawls’ Law of Peoples. 1997, (University of Reading Reading). @misc{RN55076,
title = {Rawls' Law of Peoples},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {1997},
date = {1997-01-01},
publisher = {University of Reading},
note = {University of Reading Reading},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: Når noen er likere enn andre: Likestilling og likeverd som utfordring i et mangfoldig samfunn. 1996, (Utlendingsdirektoratet Likestillingsseminar II Lysaker). @misc{RN55115,
title = {Når noen er likere enn andre: Likestilling og likeverd som utfordring i et mangfoldig samfunn},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {1996},
date = {1996-12-01},
publisher = {Utlendingsdirektoratet Likestillingsseminar II},
note = {Utlendingsdirektoratet Likestillingsseminar II Lysaker},
keywords = {Consultancy, Policy advice, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: Demokrati i EU. 1996, (Administrasjonsdepartementet ARENAs departementseminar Oslo). @misc{RN55112,
title = {Demokrati i EU},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {1996},
date = {1996-10-01},
publisher = {Administrasjonsdepartementet ARENAs departementseminar},
note = {Administrasjonsdepartementet ARENAs departementseminar Oslo},
keywords = {Policy advice, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: Livssynsmangfold som utfordring og Likestilling, Rettighetsfesting og holdningsdannelse. 1996, (Utlendingsdirektoratetet UDI Øst Oslo). @misc{RN55113,
title = {Livssynsmangfold som utfordring og Likestilling, Rettighetsfesting og holdningsdannelse},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {1996},
date = {1996-10-01},
publisher = {Utlendingsdirektoratetet UDI Øst},
note = {Utlendingsdirektoratetet UDI Øst Oslo},
keywords = {Consultancy, Policy advice, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Communitarian Criticism of Liberal Contractualism: An account and a Defense. 1996, (The International Society for the Study of European Ideas Conference on Memory, History and Critique: The European Legacy Utrecht). @misc{RN55109,
title = {Communitarian Criticism of Liberal Contractualism: An account and a Defense},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {1996},
date = {1996-08-01},
publisher = {The International Society for the Study of European Ideas Conference on Memory, History and Critique: The European Legacy},
note = {The International Society for the Study of European Ideas Conference on Memory, History and Critique: The European Legacy Utrecht},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: The Concern for Consent. 1996, (Conference of the European Society for Philosophy of Medicine and Health Care Vienna). @misc{RN55108,
title = {The Concern for Consent},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {1996},
date = {1996-08-01},
publisher = {Conference of the European Society for Philosophy of Medicine and Health Care},
note = {Conference of the European Society for Philosophy of Medicine and Health Care Vienna},
keywords = {Public policy, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Democracy and Federalism in the EU. 1996, (ARENA Conference on Democracy and the EU Oslo). @misc{RN55106,
title = {Democracy and Federalism in the EU},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {1996},
date = {1996-08-01},
publisher = {ARENA Conference on Democracy and the EU},
note = {ARENA Conference on Democracy and the EU Oslo},
keywords = {Democratic theory, Federalism, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: The Standing of States. 1996, (The Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society Conference on Current Issues in Political Philosophy: Justice and Welfare in Society and World Order Kirchberg, Austria). @misc{RN55107,
title = {The Standing of States},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {1996},
date = {1996-08-01},
publisher = {The Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society Conference on Current Issues in Political Philosophy: Justice and Welfare in Society and World Order},
note = {The Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society Conference on Current Issues in Political Philosophy: Justice and Welfare in Society and World Order Kirchberg, Austria},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: The Standing of States. 1996, (Conference on Political Theory Randsvangen). @misc{RN55110,
title = {The Standing of States},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {1996},
date = {1996-08-01},
note = {Conference on Political Theory Randsvangen},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: Kulturell pluralisme og John Rawls’ teori om enighet og likevekt. 1996, (HF, UiO Etikkseminar Oslo). @misc{RN55111,
title = {Kulturell pluralisme og John Rawls' teori om enighet og likevekt},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {1996},
date = {1996-08-01},
publisher = {HF, UiO Etikkseminar},
note = {HF, UiO Etikkseminar Oslo},
keywords = {John Rawls, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: Strategier mot diskriminering og rasisme. Likestilling som mål, rettighetsfesting og holdningskampanjer som middel?. 1996, (Nordisk integrasjonsseminar København). @misc{RN55105,
title = {Strategier mot diskriminering og rasisme. Likestilling som mål, rettighetsfesting og holdningskampanjer som middel?},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {1996},
date = {1996-06-01},
publisher = {Nordisk integrasjonsseminar},
note = {Nordisk integrasjonsseminar København},
keywords = {Consultancy, Policy advice, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: Fordelingsprinsipper i et rettferdig samfunn: teoretiske perspektiver på sammenhenger mellom individers interesser, de goder som fordeles, og de fordelingsprinsipper som bør gjelde i et rettferdig samfunn.. 1996, (Utlendingsdirektoratet – UDI Likestillingskurs Oslo). @misc{RN55104,
title = {Fordelingsprinsipper i et rettferdig samfunn: teoretiske perspektiver på sammenhenger mellom individers interesser, de goder som fordeles, og de fordelingsprinsipper som bør gjelde i et rettferdig samfunn.},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {1996},
date = {1996-06-01},
publisher = {Utlendingsdirektoratet - UDI Likestillingskurs},
note = {Utlendingsdirektoratet - UDI Likestillingskurs Oslo},
keywords = {Consultancy, Policy advice, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: Redegjørelse for normativ forskning i Norge om Velferdsstat og rettferdighet. 1996, (Norges forskningsråd Oslo). @misc{RN55102,
title = {Redegjørelse for normativ forskning i Norge om Velferdsstat og rettferdighet},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {1996},
date = {1996-05-01},
publisher = {Norges forskningsråd},
note = {Norges forskningsråd Oslo},
keywords = {Research policy, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: Lydig eller lojal? Om ledere og etiske dilemmar i offentlig forvaltning. 1996, (Oslo Rådhus Oslo). @misc{RN55103,
title = {Lydig eller lojal? Om ledere og etiske dilemmar i offentlig forvaltning},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {1996},
date = {1996-05-01},
publisher = {Oslo Rådhus},
note = {Oslo Rådhus Oslo},
keywords = {Consultancy, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Democracy in the EU: A Liberal Contractualist Perspective. 1996, (ECPR Conference Oslo). @misc{RN55101,
title = {Democracy in the EU: A Liberal Contractualist Perspective},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {1996},
date = {1996-03-01},
publisher = {ECPR Conference},
note = {ECPR Conference Oslo},
keywords = {Democratic theory, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: Hva står på spill oss imellom? Om grunnbehov, funksjoner og andre interesser som grunnlag for krav. 1996, (Senter for Vitskapsteori, Universitetet i Bergen Bergen). @misc{RN55099,
title = {Hva står på spill oss imellom? Om grunnbehov, funksjoner og andre interesser som grunnlag for krav},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {1996},
date = {1996-03-01},
publisher = {Senter for Vitskapsteori, Universitetet i Bergen},
note = {Senter for Vitskapsteori, Universitetet i Bergen Bergen},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: Hvem bør styre høyskoler?. 1996, (Arkitekthøgskolen i Oslo, studentutvalget Oslo). @misc{RN55098,
title = {Hvem bør styre høyskoler?},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {1996},
date = {1996-03-01},
publisher = {Arkitekthøgskolen i Oslo, studentutvalget},
note = {Arkitekthøgskolen i Oslo, studentutvalget Oslo},
keywords = {Research policy, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: Hvordan takler vi etiske dilemmaer i arbeidssituasjonen. 1996, (Senter for Personal- og Organisasjonsutvikling Oso). @misc{RN55100,
title = {Hvordan takler vi etiske dilemmaer i arbeidssituasjonen},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {1996},
date = {1996-03-01},
publisher = {Senter for Personal- og Organisasjonsutvikling},
note = {Senter for Personal- og Organisasjonsutvikling Oso},
keywords = {Consultancy, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Minority Rights: A Liberal Contractualist Case. In: Raikka, Juha (Ed.): Do We Need Minority Rights? Conceptual Issues, pp. 59-83, Kluwer Law International, The Hague, 1996. @inbook{RN16130,
title = {Minority Rights: A Liberal Contractualist Case},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
editor = {Juha Raikka},
url = {http://follesdal.net/ms/Follesdal-1996-minorit.rtf},
year = {1996},
date = {1996-01-01},
booktitle = {Do We Need Minority Rights? Conceptual Issues},
pages = {59-83},
publisher = {Kluwer Law International},
address = {The Hague},
abstract = {This article seeks to bring liberal contractualism to bear on some of the philosophical issues raised by the claims regarding cultural protection by minorities in Europe. The aim is to explore what our commitment to equal respect entails with regards to legal protection and promotion of minority cultures. Section 1 presents some of the central philosophical and practical challenges facing such a normative theory of cultural rights: aThe interests in culture, bScope of toleration for groups, cThe significance of choice of minority status, dThe case for human rights protecting minority culture.
Section 2 sketches a liberal contractualist perspective regarding the value of cultural membership within a liberal framework. Section 3 develops some responses to the philosophical issues. I suggest that we may insist on the value of cultural membership, and in particular that individuals have an interest in controlling cultural change. However, this interest does not support claims that institutions must ensure equal contexts of choice for all citizens. Equal capabilities or opportunities of this kind is beyond what justice requires, partly due to problems of measurability. However, the interest in controlling cultural change may in principle ground rights of several kinds.
- rights may be needed to provide a threshold of legal protections enabling minorities to explore, share and convey their culture to each other. Examples may include parents' right to teach their children about their culture, their language and their religion.
- rights may be needed to protect a culture from undue outside forces with regards to change and development. Such rights may prohibit government interference in internal minority affairs except to protect individuals' human rights. In other circumstances, minority representation on political bodies may be appropriate, particularly because the conflicts can arise in unpredictable ways.
- Transparency regarding the use of government discretion is often important. Minorities' interests may support a requirement that governments develop a public policy regarding treatment of minorities, or that the government funds impact statements to discover harmful effects on minorities' culture. Thus one might argue that states should have international reporting obligations concerning the institutions that regulate minority cultures. Such obligations provide domestic minorities with leverage against governmental abuses. International audiences and public expressions of commitments reduce the risks that a government will abuse its domestic authority. Reporting also provides states of good will with a forum for receiving constructive suggestions about institutional design.},
keywords = {Human Rights},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
This article seeks to bring liberal contractualism to bear on some of the philosophical issues raised by the claims regarding cultural protection by minorities in Europe. The aim is to explore what our commitment to equal respect entails with regards to legal protection and promotion of minority cultures. Section 1 presents some of the central philosophical and practical challenges facing such a normative theory of cultural rights: aThe interests in culture, bScope of toleration for groups, cThe significance of choice of minority status, dThe case for human rights protecting minority culture.
Section 2 sketches a liberal contractualist perspective regarding the value of cultural membership within a liberal framework. Section 3 develops some responses to the philosophical issues. I suggest that we may insist on the value of cultural membership, and in particular that individuals have an interest in controlling cultural change. However, this interest does not support claims that institutions must ensure equal contexts of choice for all citizens. Equal capabilities or opportunities of this kind is beyond what justice requires, partly due to problems of measurability. However, the interest in controlling cultural change may in principle ground rights of several kinds.
– rights may be needed to provide a threshold of legal protections enabling minorities to explore, share and convey their culture to each other. Examples may include parents’ right to teach their children about their culture, their language and their religion.
– rights may be needed to protect a culture from undue outside forces with regards to change and development. Such rights may prohibit government interference in internal minority affairs except to protect individuals’ human rights. In other circumstances, minority representation on political bodies may be appropriate, particularly because the conflicts can arise in unpredictable ways.
– Transparency regarding the use of government discretion is often important. Minorities’ interests may support a requirement that governments develop a public policy regarding treatment of minorities, or that the government funds impact statements to discover harmful effects on minorities’ culture. Thus one might argue that states should have international reporting obligations concerning the institutions that regulate minority cultures. Such obligations provide domestic minorities with leverage against governmental abuses. International audiences and public expressions of commitments reduce the risks that a government will abuse its domestic authority. Reporting also provides states of good will with a forum for receiving constructive suggestions about institutional design. |
Follesdal, Andreas: The standing of states: On John Rawls’ “Law of Peoples”. In: Koller, Peter; Puhl, Klaus (Ed.): Current issues in political philosophy, The Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society, Kirchberg am Wechsel, Austria, 1996, (Volume ID: 4
Call Number: (A)). @inbook{RN23660,
title = {The standing of states: On John Rawls' "Law of Peoples"},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
editor = {Peter Koller and Klaus Puhl},
year = {1996},
date = {1996-01-01},
booktitle = {Current issues in political philosophy},
publisher = {The Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society},
address = {Kirchberg am Wechsel, Austria},
note = {Volume ID: 4
Call Number: (A)},
keywords = {John Rawls},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: Minoriteters levekår: Hva må vi vite, og hvorfor? Normative perspektiver. 1996, (SEFOS/IMER seminar om Metodologiske tilnærminger til studiet av fordommer og diskriminering Bergen). @misc{RN55097,
title = {Minoriteters levekår: Hva må vi vite, og hvorfor? Normative perspektiver},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {1996},
date = {1996-01-01},
publisher = {SEFOS/IMER seminar om Metodologiske tilnærminger til studiet av fordommer og diskriminering},
note = {SEFOS/IMER seminar om Metodologiske tilnærminger til studiet av fordommer og diskriminering Bergen},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Christmas celebration in multi-cultural Norway. 1995, (Asker og Bærum Prosti Oslo). @misc{RN55125,
title = {Christmas celebration in multi-cultural Norway},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {1995},
date = {1995-11-01},
publisher = {Asker og Bærum Prosti},
note = {Asker og Bærum Prosti Oslo},
keywords = {Service, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: Rawls’ folkerett — en kritikk. 1995, (Konferanse i politisk teori Hønefoss). @misc{RN55124,
title = {Rawls' folkerett -- en kritikk},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {1995},
date = {1995-11-01},
publisher = {Konferanse i politisk teori},
note = {Konferanse i politisk teori Hønefoss},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: Opplæring i Oslo Sporveier — Etiske perspektiver. 1995, (Oslo Sporveier Noresund). @misc{RN55123,
title = {Opplæring i Oslo Sporveier -- Etiske perspektiver},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {1995},
date = {1995-10-01},
publisher = {Oslo Sporveier},
note = {Oslo Sporveier Noresund},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Do welfare obligations end at the boundaries of the nation state?. 1995, (SEEP Conference Hannover). @misc{RN55120,
title = {Do welfare obligations end at the boundaries of the nation state?},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {1995},
date = {1995-09-01},
publisher = {SEEP Conference},
note = {SEEP Conference Hannover},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Normative research on the Europeanisation of the Nation State. 1995, (Uppsala universitet Uppsala). @misc{RN55122,
title = {Normative research on the Europeanisation of the Nation State},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {1995},
date = {1995-09-01},
publisher = {Uppsala universitet},
note = {Uppsala universitet Uppsala},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: The significance of sovereign states. 1995, (ARENA Seminar Oslo). @misc{RN55119,
title = {The significance of sovereign states},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {1995},
date = {1995-09-01},
publisher = {ARENA Seminar},
note = {ARENA Seminar Oslo},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: The Significance of state borders. 1995, (Uppsala universitet Uppsala). @misc{RN55121,
title = {The Significance of state borders},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {1995},
date = {1995-09-01},
publisher = {Uppsala universitet},
note = {Uppsala universitet Uppsala},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Do welfare obligations end at the boundaries of the nation state?. 1995, (ARENA Seminar Hankø). @misc{RN55118,
title = {Do welfare obligations end at the boundaries of the nation state?},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {1995},
date = {1995-08-01},
publisher = {ARENA Seminar},
note = {ARENA Seminar Hankø},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: The significance of borders, national and European. 1995, (ARENA Seminar Oslo). @misc{RN55117,
title = {The significance of borders, national and European},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {1995},
date = {1995-03-01},
publisher = {ARENA Seminar},
note = {ARENA Seminar Oslo},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: Om forskning, personvern og samtykke. 1995, (Det Norske Videnskaps-Akademi – DNVA og NESH Oslo). @misc{RN55116,
title = {Om forskning, personvern og samtykke},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {1995},
date = {1995-02-01},
publisher = {Det Norske Videnskaps-Akademi - DNVA og NESH},
note = {Det Norske Videnskaps-Akademi - DNVA og NESH Oslo},
keywords = {Research policy, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: Bærekraftig utvikling og internasjonal rettferdighet (Sustainable Development and International Justice). In: Langhelle, Oluf; Lafferty, William (Ed.): Bærekraftig utvikling — om utviklingens mål og bærekraftens betingelser, pp. 77-92, Ad Notam Gyldendal, Oslo, 1995. @inbook{RN13480,
title = {Bærekraftig utvikling og internasjonal rettferdighet (Sustainable Development and International Justice)},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
editor = {Oluf Langhelle and William Lafferty},
year = {1995},
date = {1995-01-01},
booktitle = {Bærekraftig utvikling -- om utviklingens mål og bærekraftens betingelser},
pages = {77-92},
publisher = {Ad Notam Gyldendal},
address = {Oslo},
abstract = {Dersom det oppstår konflikter mellom grunnbehovene til verdens fattige og hensynet til miljø, bør grunnbehov gis første prioritet. Dette er Brundtlandkommisjonens standpunkt. Artikkelen tar sikte på å forsvare og utdype denne prioriteringen, som jeg skal kalle menneskerettighetenes primat for utviklingsstrategi. Utviklingsstrategier bør sikre grunnbehovene for dagens fattige, gjennom å respektere menneskerettighetene -- om nødvendig på bekostning av å sikre miljøet.},
keywords = {Climate, Policy advice},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
Dersom det oppstår konflikter mellom grunnbehovene til verdens fattige og hensynet til miljø, bør grunnbehov gis første prioritet. Dette er Brundtlandkommisjonens standpunkt. Artikkelen tar sikte på å forsvare og utdype denne prioriteringen, som jeg skal kalle menneskerettighetenes primat for utviklingsstrategi. Utviklingsstrategier bør sikre grunnbehovene for dagens fattige, gjennom å respektere menneskerettighetene — om nødvendig på bekostning av å sikre miljøet. |
Follesdal, Andreas: Justifying human rights: the challenge of cross-cultural toleration. In: European Journal of Law, Philosophy and Computer Science, vol. 4, pp. 37-48, 1995. @article{RN14510,
title = {Justifying human rights: the challenge of cross-cultural toleration},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
url = {http://follesdal.net/ms/Follesdal-1995-mr-tol.rtf},
year = {1995},
date = {1995-01-01},
journal = {European Journal of Law, Philosophy and Computer Science},
volume = {4},
pages = {37-48},
abstract = {How should universal human rights be justified in a world system of sovereign states, characterized by incompatible modes of life and religious and philosophical traditions? Human rights face a double challenge: they appear to violate the norm of state sovereignty, and they seem difficult to justify under value pluralism, across deep cross-cultural differences -- forcing us to consider whether they are intolerant, "Eurocentric" attempts at reforming all nation states.
Based on reflections about why we need a theory of human rights, the paper argues that a justification for human rights need not be acceptable to all existing states: there are justifiable limits of toleration. A satisfactory justification, giving sufficient clarity regarding human rights, can build upon overlapping consensus among those world views which respect each other, and which include a commitment to the equal worth of all citizens. However, human rights need not be based on the intrinsic worth of individuals' autonomy, and can in principle include group rights such as the right to development. Human rights are justified as requirements of domestic and international legal safeguards of the basic needs of individuals, against certain standard threats posed by state power and the system of states. This account allows for the universality of human rights, and can respond to the challenge of toleration.
Based on Føllesdal 1992: "Hvordan begrunne menneskerettighetene?"},
keywords = {Human Rights},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
How should universal human rights be justified in a world system of sovereign states, characterized by incompatible modes of life and religious and philosophical traditions? Human rights face a double challenge: they appear to violate the norm of state sovereignty, and they seem difficult to justify under value pluralism, across deep cross-cultural differences — forcing us to consider whether they are intolerant, “Eurocentric” attempts at reforming all nation states.
Based on reflections about why we need a theory of human rights, the paper argues that a justification for human rights need not be acceptable to all existing states: there are justifiable limits of toleration. A satisfactory justification, giving sufficient clarity regarding human rights, can build upon overlapping consensus among those world views which respect each other, and which include a commitment to the equal worth of all citizens. However, human rights need not be based on the intrinsic worth of individuals’ autonomy, and can in principle include group rights such as the right to development. Human rights are justified as requirements of domestic and international legal safeguards of the basic needs of individuals, against certain standard threats posed by state power and the system of states. This account allows for the universality of human rights, and can respond to the challenge of toleration.
Based on Føllesdal 1992: “Hvordan begrunne menneskerettighetene?” |
Føllesdal, Andreas: Etikk i kommunal virksomhet. 1994, (Oslo kommune). @misc{RN55132,
title = {Etikk i kommunal virksomhet},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {1994},
date = {1994-12-01},
publisher = {Oslo kommune},
note = {Oslo kommune},
keywords = {Consultancy, Policy advice, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: ARENA’s research on normative political theory. 1994, (ARENA). @misc{RN55134,
title = {ARENA's research on normative political theory},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {1994},
date = {1994-11-01},
publisher = {ARENA},
note = {ARENA},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: On Rawls’ the Law of Peoples’. 1994, (HF, UiO Etikkseminar). @misc{RN55135,
title = {On Rawls' the Law of Peoples'},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {1994},
date = {1994-11-01},
publisher = {HF, UiO Etikkseminar},
note = {HF, UiO Etikkseminar},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
