Follesdal, Andreas: Exporting Subsidiarity and the Margin of Appreciation: Lessons for the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. 2015, (IVR Workshop on International human rights courts: enhancers or enemies of democracy – or both? European and Inter-American perspectives Washington). @misc{RN54562,
title = {Exporting Subsidiarity and the Margin of Appreciation: Lessons for the Inter-American Court of Human Rights},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-07-01},
publisher = {IVR Workshop on International human rights courts: enhancers or enemies of democracy - or both? European and Inter-American perspectives},
note = {IVR Workshop on International human rights courts: enhancers or enemies of democracy - or both? European and Inter-American perspectives Washington},
keywords = {Human Rights, Margin of Appreciation, Subsidiarity, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Are Concepts of Legitimacy for International Courts Related, and How?. 2015, (Political Philosophy Colloquium Frankfurt). @misc{RN54564,
title = {Are Concepts of Legitimacy for International Courts Related, and How?},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-07-01},
publisher = {Political Philosophy Colloquium},
note = {Political Philosophy Colloquium Frankfurt},
keywords = {International courts, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Are Concepts of Legitimacy for International Courts Related, and How?. 2015, (Justitia Amplificata Conference on The Challenges of Global Pluralism Frankfurt). @misc{RN54563,
title = {Are Concepts of Legitimacy for International Courts Related, and How?},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-07-01},
publisher = {Justitia Amplificata Conference on The Challenges of Global Pluralism},
note = {Justitia Amplificata Conference on The Challenges of Global Pluralism Frankfurt},
keywords = {International courts, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Are Concepts of Legitimacy for International Courts Related, and How?. 2015, (IVR Workshop on Legitimacy discourses about international courts: Reason or emotion? Washington). @misc{RN54561,
title = {Are Concepts of Legitimacy for International Courts Related, and How?},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-07-01},
publisher = {IVR Workshop on Legitimacy discourses about international courts: Reason or emotion?},
note = {IVR Workshop on Legitimacy discourses about international courts: Reason or emotion? Washington},
keywords = {International courts, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: On the ‘Emerging Consensus’ Doctrine. 2015, (PluriCourts workshop on Subsidiarity and the Margin of Appreciation” Oslo). @misc{RN54570,
title = {On the 'Emerging Consensus' Doctrine},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-06-01},
publisher = {PluriCourts workshop on Subsidiarity and the Margin of Appreciation”},
note = {PluriCourts workshop on Subsidiarity and the Margin of Appreciation” Oslo},
keywords = {Margin of Appreciation, Subsidiarity, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Engagement, Divestment or Both: Conflicts and Interactions -The Case of the Norwegian Pension Fund. 2015, (Oxford University Workshop on Socially Responsible Investing Oxford). @misc{RN54569,
title = {Engagement, Divestment or Both: Conflicts and Interactions -The Case of the Norwegian Pension Fund},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-06-01},
publisher = {Oxford University Workshop on Socially Responsible Investing},
note = {Oxford University Workshop on Socially Responsible Investing Oxford},
keywords = {SRI - Socially responsible investing, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: On Effectiveness, Subsidiarity and the Margin of Appreciation. 2015, (PluriCourts Annual Conference Oslo). @misc{RN54572,
title = {On Effectiveness, Subsidiarity and the Margin of Appreciation},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-05-01},
publisher = {PluriCourts Annual Conference},
note = {PluriCourts Annual Conference Oslo},
keywords = {Margin of Appreciation, Subsidiarity, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: On Albert Weale: Democratic Justice and the Social Contract,. 2015, (LUISS University Workshop Rome). @misc{RN54571,
title = {On Albert Weale: Democratic Justice and the Social Contract,},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-05-01},
publisher = {LUISS University Workshop},
note = {LUISS University Workshop Rome},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: Om Høyesterett. 2015, (Universitetet i Bergen Seminar om Norges Høyesterett Bergen). @misc{RN54574,
title = {Om Høyesterett},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-04-01},
publisher = {Universitetet i Bergen Seminar om Norges Høyesterett},
note = {Universitetet i Bergen Seminar om Norges Høyesterett Bergen},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: Bør banker berges?. 2015, (Det Norske Videnskaps-Akademi – DNVA Seminar om Norges Bank Oslo). @misc{RN54573,
title = {Bør banker berges?},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-04-01},
publisher = {Det Norske Videnskaps-Akademi - DNVA Seminar om Norges Bank},
note = {Det Norske Videnskaps-Akademi - DNVA Seminar om Norges Bank Oslo},
keywords = {Policy advice, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: The Legitimation Strategies of the European Court of Human Rights. 2015, (ECPR Workshop on The Quest for Legitimacy in World Politics – International Organizations’ Self-Legitimations” Warsaw). @misc{RN54575,
title = {The Legitimation Strategies of the European Court of Human Rights},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-03-01},
publisher = {ECPR Workshop on The Quest for Legitimacy in World Politics – International Organizations’ Self-Legitimations”},
note = {ECPR Workshop on The Quest for Legitimacy in World Politics – International Organizations’ Self-Legitimations” Warsaw},
keywords = {European Court of Human Rights, Human Rights, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: The European Court of Human Rights: Between Scylla and Charybdis? Does subsidiarity and the margin of appreciation help the Court protect international human rights and respect sovereignty – or neither?. 2015, (University of Leuven Seminar on Sovereignty, Belgium). @misc{RN54576,
title = {The European Court of Human Rights: Between Scylla and Charybdis? Does subsidiarity and the margin of appreciation help the Court protect international human rights and respect sovereignty - or neither?},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-03-01},
publisher = {University of Leuven Seminar on Sovereignty,},
note = {University of Leuven Seminar on Sovereignty, Belgium},
keywords = {European Court of Human Rights, Human Rights, Margin of Appreciation, Subsidiarity, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Criteria for [parliamentary] civil disobedience of international courts: A theory of Civil Disobedience for International Law. 2015, (MultiRights Workshop on ‘The International Human Rights Judiciary and National Parliaments Oslo). @misc{RN54577,
title = {Criteria for [parliamentary] civil disobedience of international courts: A theory of Civil Disobedience for International Law},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-03-01},
publisher = {MultiRights Workshop on 'The International Human Rights Judiciary and National Parliaments},
note = {MultiRights Workshop on 'The International Human Rights Judiciary and National Parliaments Oslo},
keywords = {Human Rights, International courts, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: The Authority of International Courts: Raz’ Service Conception’ and Beyond. 2015, (The Arctic University of Norway Workshop Tromsø). @misc{RN54578,
title = {The Authority of International Courts: Raz' Service Conception' and Beyond},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-03-01},
publisher = {The Arctic University of Norway Workshop},
note = {The Arctic University of Norway Workshop Tromsø},
keywords = {International courts, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: The European Court of Human Rights: Between Scylla and Charybdis? Does subsidiarity and the margin of appreciation help the Court protect international human rights and respect sovereignty – or neither?. 2015, (Queen Mary University Conference on Transnational federalism London). @misc{RN54582,
title = {The European Court of Human Rights: Between Scylla and Charybdis? Does subsidiarity and the margin of appreciation help the Court protect international human rights and respect sovereignty - or neither?},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-02-01},
publisher = {Queen Mary University Conference on Transnational federalism},
note = {Queen Mary University Conference on Transnational federalism London},
keywords = {European Court of Human Rights, Federalism, Human Rights, Margin of Appreciation, Subsidiarity, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Conclusions on Proportionality. 2015, (PluriCourts Workshop on Proportionality in International Law Paris). @misc{RN54581,
title = {Conclusions on Proportionality},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-02-01},
publisher = {PluriCourts Workshop on Proportionality in International Law},
note = {PluriCourts Workshop on Proportionality in International Law Paris},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Are Concepts of Legitimacy for International Courts Related, and how?. 2015, (International Studies Association Workshop New Orleans). @misc{RN54580,
title = {Are Concepts of Legitimacy for International Courts Related, and how?},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-02-01},
publisher = {International Studies Association Workshop},
note = {International Studies Association Workshop New Orleans},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Are Concepts of Legitimacy for International Courts Related, and How?. 2015, (Workshop on Legitimacy Barcelona). @misc{RN54579,
title = {Are Concepts of Legitimacy for International Courts Related, and How?},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-02-01},
publisher = {Workshop on Legitimacy},
note = {Workshop on Legitimacy Barcelona},
keywords = {International courts, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: International Human Rights Courts: Beyond a State of Nature – Foreword. In: Ajevski, Marjan (Ed.): Fragmentation in International Human Rights Law: Beyond Conflicts of Laws, pp. xi-xviii, Routledge, London, 2015. @inbook{RN50083,
title = {International Human Rights Courts: Beyond a State of Nature - Foreword},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
editor = {Marjan Ajevski},
url = {http://www.follesdal.net/ms/Follesdal-2015-hr-ics-state-of-nature.pdf},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
booktitle = {Fragmentation in International Human Rights Law: Beyond Conflicts of Laws},
pages = {xi-xviii},
publisher = {Routledge},
address = {London},
abstract = {The subject of this fascinating volume is the fragmentation of international and regional human rights courts and treaty bodies (ICs), that is, tensions among courts which all address the same functional area, often bringing apparently similar norms to bear. The rights of concern here are widely regarded as belonging to the core of human rights: freedom of expression, right to privacy, freedom of assembly, and freedom of association.
What are we to make of the conflicts that occur not only among such rights and other norms of international law – ranging from trade to the environment – but conflicts among the various human rights courts empower to adjudicate such rights – which courts and rights often conflict?},
keywords = {Human Rights},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
The subject of this fascinating volume is the fragmentation of international and regional human rights courts and treaty bodies (ICs), that is, tensions among courts which all address the same functional area, often bringing apparently similar norms to bear. The rights of concern here are widely regarded as belonging to the core of human rights: freedom of expression, right to privacy, freedom of assembly, and freedom of association.
What are we to make of the conflicts that occur not only among such rights and other norms of international law – ranging from trade to the environment – but conflicts among the various human rights courts empower to adjudicate such rights – which courts and rights often conflict? |
Ajevski, Marjan: Fragmentation in International Human Rights Law: Beyond Conflicts of Laws. Routledge, London, 2015. @book{RN50234,
title = {Fragmentation in International Human Rights Law: Beyond Conflicts of Laws},
author = {Marjan Ajevski},
url = {http://www.follesdal.net/ms/Follesdal-2015-hr-ics-state-of-nature.pdf},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
publisher = {Routledge},
address = {London},
abstract = {The subject of this fascinating volume is the fragmentation of international and regional human rights courts and treaty bodies (ICs), that is, tensions among courts which all address the same functional area, often bringing apparently similar norms to bear. The rights of concern here are widely regarded as belonging to the core of human rights: freedom of expression, right to privacy, freedom of assembly, and freedom of association.
What are we to make of the conflicts that occur not only among such rights and other norms of international law – ranging from trade to the environment – but conflicts among the various human rights courts empower to adjudicate such rights – which courts and rights often conflict?},
keywords = {Human Rights},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {book}
}
The subject of this fascinating volume is the fragmentation of international and regional human rights courts and treaty bodies (ICs), that is, tensions among courts which all address the same functional area, often bringing apparently similar norms to bear. The rights of concern here are widely regarded as belonging to the core of human rights: freedom of expression, right to privacy, freedom of assembly, and freedom of association.
What are we to make of the conflicts that occur not only among such rights and other norms of international law – ranging from trade to the environment – but conflicts among the various human rights courts empower to adjudicate such rights – which courts and rights often conflict? |
Follesdal, Andreas: The Authority of International Courts: Raz’ Service Conception’ and Beyond. 2014, (iCourts Conference on International Jurisprudence: Rethinking the Concept of Law in the light of Contemporary International Legality Copenhagen). @misc{RN54583,
title = {The Authority of International Courts: Raz' Service Conception' and Beyond},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-12-01},
publisher = {iCourts Conference on International Jurisprudence: Rethinking the Concept of Law in the light of Contemporary International Legality},
note = {iCourts Conference on International Jurisprudence: Rethinking the Concept of Law in the light of Contemporary International Legality Copenhagen},
keywords = {International courts, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Subsidiarity and International Courts. 2014, (Faculty of Law, UiO Seminar Oslo). @misc{RN54589,
title = {Subsidiarity and International Courts},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-11-01},
publisher = {Faculty of Law, UiO Seminar},
note = {Faculty of Law, UiO Seminar Oslo},
keywords = {International courts, Subsidiarity, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: On Legitimacy. 2014, (PluriCourts Concepts and Methods workshop Oslo). @misc{RN54586,
title = {On Legitimacy},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-11-01},
publisher = {PluriCourts Concepts and Methods workshop},
note = {PluriCourts Concepts and Methods workshop Oslo},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Judicial Independence and legitimacy. 2014, (Pompeu Fabra University Workshop on The independence of the international judiciary Barcelona). @misc{RN54587,
title = {Judicial Independence and legitimacy},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-11-01},
publisher = {Pompeu Fabra University Workshop on The independence of the international judiciary},
note = {Pompeu Fabra University Workshop on The independence of the international judiciary Barcelona},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: How the European Court of Human Rights enhances democracy – a defense’ The Berlin Workshop, Democracy programme UiO. 2014, (Oslo). @misc{RN54588,
title = {How the European Court of Human Rights enhances democracy - a defense' The Berlin Workshop, Democracy programme UiO},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-11-01},
note = {Oslo},
keywords = {Democratic theory, European Court of Human Rights, Human Rights, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Constitutionalization of international law – what would count as constitutional moments? Lessons from the EU. 2014, (German-Southeast Asian Center for Public Policy and Good Governance Conference on Constitutional Moments, Turning Points and Legacies in the Formation of Political Communities in Historical Perspectives Bangkok). @misc{RN54584,
title = {Constitutionalization of international law – what would count as constitutional moments? Lessons from the EU},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-11-01},
publisher = {German-Southeast Asian Center for Public Policy and Good Governance Conference on Constitutional Moments, Turning Points and Legacies in the Formation of Political Communities in Historical Perspectives},
note = {German-Southeast Asian Center for Public Policy and Good Governance Conference on Constitutional Moments, Turning Points and Legacies in the Formation of Political Communities in Historical Perspectives Bangkok},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: Om å søke SFF. 2014, (Samfunnsvitenskapelig fakultet, UiO Oslo). @misc{RN54591,
title = {Om å søke SFF},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-10-01},
publisher = {Samfunnsvitenskapelig fakultet, UiO},
note = {Samfunnsvitenskapelig fakultet, UiO Oslo},
keywords = {Service, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: How the ECtHR promotes transitional justice”. 2014, (MultiRights Seminar Oslo). @misc{RN54590,
title = {How the ECtHR promotes transitional justice”},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-10-01},
publisher = {MultiRights Seminar},
note = {MultiRights Seminar Oslo},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: The Normative Legitimacy of International Courts and Tribunals. 2014, (ECPR Workshop Glasgow). @misc{RN54593,
title = {The Normative Legitimacy of International Courts and Tribunals},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-09-01},
publisher = {ECPR Workshop},
note = {ECPR Workshop Glasgow},
keywords = {International courts, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Democratic and other standards of legitimacy for International Courts. 2014, (Symposium on Legitimacy and International Courts, Center for International & Comparative Law Baltimore). @misc{RN54592,
title = {Democratic and other standards of legitimacy for International Courts},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-09-01},
publisher = {Symposium on Legitimacy and International Courts, Center for International & Comparative Law Baltimore},
note = {Symposium on Legitimacy and International Courts, Center for International & Comparative Law Baltimore},
keywords = {International courts, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Tracking Justice democratically, or with international human Rights Review – or both?. 2014, (Arctic University of Norway Tromsø). @misc{RN54597,
title = {Tracking Justice democratically, or with international human Rights Review – or both?},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-06-01},
publisher = {Arctic University of Norway},
note = {Arctic University of Norway Tromsø},
keywords = {Human Rights, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Subsidiarity and the European Court of Human Rights: respecting self governance and protecting human rights – or neither?. 2014, (Hertie School of Governance Berlin). @misc{RN54596,
title = {Subsidiarity and the European Court of Human Rights: respecting self governance and protecting human rights – or neither?},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-06-01},
publisher = {Hertie School of Governance},
note = {Hertie School of Governance Berlin},
keywords = {European Court of Human Rights, Human Rights, Subsidiarity, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Subsidiarity to the Rescue for the European Court of Human Rights? Resolving tensions between the Margin of Appreciation and Human Rights Protection. 2014, (University of Luxembourg Workshop on Philosophical Foundations of Federalism Luxembourg). @misc{RN54601,
title = {Subsidiarity to the Rescue for the European Court of Human Rights? Resolving tensions between the Margin of Appreciation and Human Rights Protection},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-05-01},
publisher = {University of Luxembourg Workshop on Philosophical Foundations of Federalism},
note = {University of Luxembourg Workshop on Philosophical Foundations of Federalism Luxembourg},
keywords = {European Court of Human Rights, Federalism, Human Rights, Margin of Appreciation, Subsidiarity, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Publication strategies. 2014, (PluriCourts Publish & Flourish workshop Oslo). @misc{RN54600,
title = {Publication strategies},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-05-01},
publisher = {PluriCourts Publish & Flourish workshop},
note = {PluriCourts Publish & Flourish workshop Oslo},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Politics of Judicial Independence and Judicial Accountability at the ECtHR. 2014, (Masaryk University Brno). @misc{RN54598,
title = {Politics of Judicial Independence and Judicial Accountability at the ECtHR},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-05-01},
publisher = {Masaryk University},
note = {Masaryk University Brno},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Does the margin of appreciation reduce the democratic deficit of the European Court of Human Rights?”. 2014, (Prague). @misc{RN54599,
title = {Does the margin of appreciation reduce the democratic deficit of the European Court of Human Rights?”},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-05-01},
note = {Prague},
keywords = {European Court of Human Rights, Human Rights, Margin of Appreciation, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Om etikkrådet underlegges Norges Bank. 2014, (Paneldebatt om ‘Skal Oljefondet være verdens beste’ Forum for Utvikling og Miljø Oslo). @misc{RN54602,
title = {Om etikkrådet underlegges Norges Bank},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-04-01},
publisher = {Forum for Utvikling og Miljø Paneldebatt om ‘Skal Oljefondet være verdens beste’},
note = {Paneldebatt om ‘Skal Oljefondet være verdens beste’ Forum for Utvikling og Miljø Oslo},
keywords = {Climate, Public policy, SRI - Socially responsible investing, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Future topics of cooperation. 2014, (Council of Europe). @misc{RN54603,
title = {Future topics of cooperation},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-04-01},
publisher = {Council of Europe},
note = {Council of Europe},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: [No title]. 2014, (PluriCourts and Council of Europe Accountability of the European Court of Human Rights Conference Oslo). @misc{RN54604,
title = {[No title]},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-04-01},
publisher = {PluriCourts and Council of Europe Accountability of the European Court of Human Rights Conference},
note = {PluriCourts and Council of Europe Accountability of the European Court of Human Rights Conference Oslo},
keywords = {European Court of Human Rights, Human Rights, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Subsidiarity to the Rescue? Resolving tensions between the Margin of Appreciation and Human Rights Protection. 2014, (Conference on Shifting Centres of Gravity in European Rights Protection Rekjavik). @misc{RN54606,
title = {Subsidiarity to the Rescue? Resolving tensions between the Margin of Appreciation and Human Rights Protection},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-03-01},
publisher = {Conference on Shifting Centres of Gravity in European Rights Protection},
note = {Conference on Shifting Centres of Gravity in European Rights Protection Rekjavik},
keywords = {Human Rights, Margin of Appreciation, Subsidiarity, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Legitimacy. 2014, (PluriCourts Legitimacy Workshop Oslo). @misc{RN54605,
title = {Legitimacy},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-03-01},
publisher = {PluriCourts Legitimacy Workshop},
note = {PluriCourts Legitimacy Workshop Oslo},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Judicial Cosmopolitanism: the Case of the Progressive Interpretations by the European Court of Human Rights –. 2014, (PluriCourts Workshop Oslo). @misc{RN54607,
title = {Judicial Cosmopolitanism: the Case of the Progressive Interpretations by the European Court of Human Rights –},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-03-01},
publisher = {PluriCourts Workshop},
note = {PluriCourts Workshop Oslo},
keywords = {European Court of Human Rights, Human Rights, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Appreciating the Margin of Appreciation in the European Court of Human Rights. 2014, (PluriCourts Workshop on Margin of Appreciation Paris). @misc{RN54608,
title = {Appreciating the Margin of Appreciation in the European Court of Human Rights},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-02-01},
publisher = {PluriCourts Workshop on Margin of Appreciation},
note = {PluriCourts Workshop on Margin of Appreciation Paris},
keywords = {European Court of Human Rights, Human Rights, Margin of Appreciation, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: How to assess the legitimacy of international courts within a global basic structure: Three approaches. 2014, (Workshop Amsterdam). @misc{RN54609,
title = {How to assess the legitimacy of international courts within a global basic structure: Three approaches},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-01-01},
publisher = {Workshop},
note = {Workshop Amsterdam},
keywords = {International courts, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Ulfstein, Geir; Follesdal, Andreas: The European Court of Human Rights and the Norwegian Supreme Court – Independence and Democratic Control. In: Engstad, Nils Asbjørn; Frøseth, Astrid Lærdal; Tønder, Bård (Ed.): The Independence of Judges, pp. 247-260, Eleven, 2014. @inbook{RN49702,
title = {The European Court of Human Rights and the Norwegian Supreme Court – Independence and Democratic Control},
author = {Geir Ulfstein and Andreas Follesdal},
editor = {Nils Asbjørn Engstad and Astrid Lærdal Frøseth and Bård Tønder},
url = {http://www.follesdal.net/ms/Follesdal-2014-Ulfstein-etchr-supreme-court.pdf},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-01-01},
booktitle = {The Independence of Judges},
pages = {247-260},
publisher = {Eleven},
abstract = {How far the courts should go in testing legislation has been highlighted in Norway in recent years by several cases where the Supreme Court has deemed laws unconstitutional. Critics claim that courts thus interfere with democratic decision-making, whilst protecting neither the rule of law nor vulnerable population groups.2 The empowerment of courts means that the independence and qualifications of the judges become more important. It furthermore adds to ‘legalization’, which increasingly causes popular and political concern.
The internationalization of law raises further issues for judicial review. In this article, we discuss review of national law on the basis of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) and by the Norwegian Supreme Court.
We are concerned both with the possible democratic legitimacy of such review, and other grounds for legitimacy. We finally point to some implications of this internationalization of law for public perceptions of the judges’ functions in society and for their independence – and some implications for the Norwegian selection of judges to the Supreme Court and the ECtHR.},
keywords = {European Court of Human Rights, Human Rights},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
How far the courts should go in testing legislation has been highlighted in Norway in recent years by several cases where the Supreme Court has deemed laws unconstitutional. Critics claim that courts thus interfere with democratic decision-making, whilst protecting neither the rule of law nor vulnerable population groups.2 The empowerment of courts means that the independence and qualifications of the judges become more important. It furthermore adds to ‘legalization’, which increasingly causes popular and political concern.
The internationalization of law raises further issues for judicial review. In this article, we discuss review of national law on the basis of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) and by the Norwegian Supreme Court.
We are concerned both with the possible democratic legitimacy of such review, and other grounds for legitimacy. We finally point to some implications of this internationalization of law for public perceptions of the judges’ functions in society and for their independence – and some implications for the Norwegian selection of judges to the Supreme Court and the ECtHR. |
Maliks, Reidar; Follesdal, Andreas: Kantian theory and human rights. In: Follesdal, Andreas; Maliks, Reidar (Ed.): Kantian theory and human rights, pp. 1-7, Routledge, 2014. @inbook{RN49801,
title = {Kantian theory and human rights},
author = {Reidar Maliks and Andreas Follesdal},
editor = {Andreas Follesdal and Reidar Maliks},
url = {http://www.follesdal.net/ms/Follesdal-2014-Maliks-kant-hr.pdf},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-01-01},
booktitle = {Kantian theory and human rights},
pages = {1-7},
publisher = {Routledge},
abstract = {It is, perhaps, not by chance that the steep increase in theories of human rights has been matched by a renaissance in studies of Kant’s political philosophy. The essays are animated by the idea that if we get a better grip on Kant’s philosophy of right, we can energize the creative endeavor of developing philosophical theories of human rights, inspired by his particular way of thinking about the relation between rights and the rule of law. Three features characteristic of Kant’s thinking frequently crop up in the following chapters and help explain why so much recent scholarship may indeed properly be called ‘Kantian’. These features concern rights, legitimacy, and institutions. freedom is constituted by the rights and duties that enable individuals to be subject to the rule of law instead of arbitrary power. Second, political and legal authorities that establish human rights through law derive their legitimacy from being capable of justification to individuals. Third, the public institutions at the domestic and the international level are considered part of the same system. The contributions explore these Kantian principles in different directions.},
keywords = {Human Rights},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
It is, perhaps, not by chance that the steep increase in theories of human rights has been matched by a renaissance in studies of Kant’s political philosophy. The essays are animated by the idea that if we get a better grip on Kant’s philosophy of right, we can energize the creative endeavor of developing philosophical theories of human rights, inspired by his particular way of thinking about the relation between rights and the rule of law. Three features characteristic of Kant’s thinking frequently crop up in the following chapters and help explain why so much recent scholarship may indeed properly be called ‘Kantian’. These features concern rights, legitimacy, and institutions. freedom is constituted by the rights and duties that enable individuals to be subject to the rule of law instead of arbitrary power. Second, political and legal authorities that establish human rights through law derive their legitimacy from being capable of justification to individuals. Third, the public institutions at the domestic and the international level are considered part of the same system. The contributions explore these Kantian principles in different directions. |
Føllesdal, Andreas: Hvis det norske forbudet mot dobbelt statsborgerskap er løsningen, hva er da problemet?. In: Langeland, Nils Rune (Ed.): Politisk kompetanse: grunnlovas borgar 1814-2014, pp. 78-87, Pax, Oslo, 2014. @inbook{RN49330,
title = {Hvis det norske forbudet mot dobbelt statsborgerskap er løsningen, hva er da problemet?},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
editor = {Nils Rune Langeland},
url = {http://follesdal.net/ms/Follesdal-2014-dobbelt-statsborgerskap.rtf},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-01-01},
booktitle = {Politisk kompetanse: grunnlovas borgar 1814-2014},
pages = {78-87},
publisher = {Pax},
address = {Oslo},
abstract = {Hva slags kompetanse bør stemmeberettigede borgere ha? Hva bør de kunne, og hva bør de være lojale mot når de skal ha stemmerett til stortingsvalg? Blant reglene som setter disse spørsmålene på spissen, er forbudet mot dobbelt statsborgerskap i statsborgerloven av 2005. Forarbeidene til loven drøfter disse sentrale spørsmålene om politisk kompetanse og trekker flere konsekvenser. Argumentene fremført til forsvar for forbudet holder ikke mål. Det er derfor vanskelig å se hvilke legitime interesser staten har av dette forbudet, ikke minst fordi påståtte ulemper med dobbelt politisk lojalitet er dårlig begrunnet, og fordi forbudet ser ut til å hemme integrering, i strid med målsettingen.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
Hva slags kompetanse bør stemmeberettigede borgere ha? Hva bør de kunne, og hva bør de være lojale mot når de skal ha stemmerett til stortingsvalg? Blant reglene som setter disse spørsmålene på spissen, er forbudet mot dobbelt statsborgerskap i statsborgerloven av 2005. Forarbeidene til loven drøfter disse sentrale spørsmålene om politisk kompetanse og trekker flere konsekvenser. Argumentene fremført til forsvar for forbudet holder ikke mål. Det er derfor vanskelig å se hvilke legitime interesser staten har av dette forbudet, ikke minst fordi påståtte ulemper med dobbelt politisk lojalitet er dårlig begrunnet, og fordi forbudet ser ut til å hemme integrering, i strid med målsettingen. |
Føllesdal, Andreas: Del av problemet, og del av løsningen: Den europeiske menneskerettighetsdomstolen og demokratisk selvstyre. In: Baldersheim, Harald; Østerud, Øyvind (Ed.): Det norske demokratiet i det 21. århundre, pp. 80-91, Fagbokforlaget, Oslo, 2014. @inbook{RN49917,
title = {Del av problemet, og del av løsningen: Den europeiske menneskerettighetsdomstolen og demokratisk selvstyre},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
editor = {Harald Baldersheim and Øyvind Østerud},
url = {http://www.follesdal.net/ms/Follesdal-2014-emd-selvstyre.pdf},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-01-01},
booktitle = {Det norske demokratiet i det 21. århundre},
pages = {80-91},
publisher = {Fagbokforlaget},
address = {Oslo},
abstract = {For å forstå og vurdere bekymringene for fremveksten av internasjonale domstoler og domstolsliknende organer er det viktig å se hvordan de griper inn i og preger nasjonale domstoler og myndigheter. Bidrar slike domstoler til å undergrave det nasjonale demokratiske selvstyre, og i så fall: hvordan skjer det, og hva skal vi synes om dette? Artikkelen ser på ett av flere viktige områder der disse spørsmålene melder seg, nemlig om og hvordan den europeiske menneskerettighetsdomstolen respekterer nasjonale demokratiske beslutninger der det kan se ut som de bryter med den europeiske menneskerettighetskonvensjon.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
For å forstå og vurdere bekymringene for fremveksten av internasjonale domstoler og domstolsliknende organer er det viktig å se hvordan de griper inn i og preger nasjonale domstoler og myndigheter. Bidrar slike domstoler til å undergrave det nasjonale demokratiske selvstyre, og i så fall: hvordan skjer det, og hva skal vi synes om dette? Artikkelen ser på ett av flere viktige områder der disse spørsmålene melder seg, nemlig om og hvordan den europeiske menneskerettighetsdomstolen respekterer nasjonale demokratiske beslutninger der det kan se ut som de bryter med den europeiske menneskerettighetskonvensjon. |
Follesdal, Andreas; Maliks, Reidar: Kantian theory and human rights. Routledge, 2014. @book{RN49725,
title = {Kantian theory and human rights},
author = {Andreas Follesdal and Reidar Maliks},
url = {http://www.routledge.com/books/details/9780415857697/},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-01-01},
publisher = {Routledge},
abstract = {Human rights and the courts and tribunals that protect them are increasingly part of our moral, legal, and political circumstances. The growing salience of human rights has recently brought the question of their philosophical foundation to the foreground. Theorists of human rights often assume that their ideal can be traced to the philosophy of Immanuel Kant and his view of humans as ends in themselves. Yet, few have attempted to explore exactly how human rights should be understood in a Kantian framework. The scholars in this book have gathered to fill this gap. At the center of Kant’s theory of rights is a view of freedom as independence from domination. The chapters explore the significance of this theory for the nature of human rights, their justification, and the legitimacy of international human rights courts.},
keywords = {Edited books, Human Rights},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {book}
}
Human rights and the courts and tribunals that protect them are increasingly part of our moral, legal, and political circumstances. The growing salience of human rights has recently brought the question of their philosophical foundation to the foreground. Theorists of human rights often assume that their ideal can be traced to the philosophy of Immanuel Kant and his view of humans as ends in themselves. Yet, few have attempted to explore exactly how human rights should be understood in a Kantian framework. The scholars in this book have gathered to fill this gap. At the center of Kant’s theory of rights is a view of freedom as independence from domination. The chapters explore the significance of this theory for the nature of human rights, their justification, and the legitimacy of international human rights courts. |
Follesdal, Andreas: Subsidiarity and the global order. In: Zimmermann, Augusto; Evans, Michelle (Ed.): Global Perspectives on Subsidiarity, pp. 207-220, Springer, Dordrecht, 2014. @inbook{RN49328,
title = {Subsidiarity and the global order},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
editor = {Augusto Zimmermann and Michelle Evans},
url = {Follesdal-2014-subsidiarity-global-order.pdf},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-01-01},
booktitle = {Global Perspectives on Subsidiarity},
pages = {207-220},
publisher = {Springer},
address = {Dordrecht},
abstract = {Subsidiarity has been proposed as an answer to the challenges of globalization and global governance. This chapter addresses some of the strengths and weaknesses of such a principle of subsidiarity for questions of how to allocate and use authority at regional and global levels. The chapter criticizes the 'state centric' versions of subsidiarity often appealed to for such global settings. In particular, there are several challenges wrought by states that fail to respect their citizens' human rights, variously interpreted. More defensible versions of subsidiarity do not provide normative legitimacy to the state centric aspects of the global order. Section 1 sketches some of the remarkably different conceptions of subsidiarity as a background to the usages in the European Union, the Catholic Church and as it allegedly appears in international law. The different versions drastically reduce or enlarge the scope of member unit authority. Section 2 considers some implications for the legitimate allocation of authority in our global order which includes many states that routinely violate their citizens’ fundamental human rights. The function of the European Court of Human Rights offers a helpful contrast.},
keywords = {European Court of Human Rights, Human Rights},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
Subsidiarity has been proposed as an answer to the challenges of globalization and global governance. This chapter addresses some of the strengths and weaknesses of such a principle of subsidiarity for questions of how to allocate and use authority at regional and global levels. The chapter criticizes the ‘state centric’ versions of subsidiarity often appealed to for such global settings. In particular, there are several challenges wrought by states that fail to respect their citizens’ human rights, variously interpreted. More defensible versions of subsidiarity do not provide normative legitimacy to the state centric aspects of the global order. Section 1 sketches some of the remarkably different conceptions of subsidiarity as a background to the usages in the European Union, the Catholic Church and as it allegedly appears in international law. The different versions drastically reduce or enlarge the scope of member unit authority. Section 2 considers some implications for the legitimate allocation of authority in our global order which includes many states that routinely violate their citizens’ fundamental human rights. The function of the European Court of Human Rights offers a helpful contrast. |
Follesdal, Andreas: Legitimacy Challenges and what to do about them – Accountability and authority of the European Court of Human Rights. In: Proceedings of Conference on the Long-term future of the European Court of Human Rights, pp. 78-85, 2014. @article{RN49901,
title = {Legitimacy Challenges and what to do about them - Accountability and authority of the European Court of Human Rights},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
url = {www.follesdal.net/ms/Follesdal-2014-accountability-authority-CoE.pfd ;
http://www.coe.int/t/DGHL/STANDARDSETTING/CDDH/REFORMECHR/Publications/Proceedings-Oslo-2014.pdf},
doi = {http://ssrn.com/abstract=2463626},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-01-01},
booktitle = {Proceedings of Conference on the Long-term future of the European Court of Human Rights},
journal = {Proceedings of Conference on the Long-term future of the European Court of Human Rights},
pages = {78-85},
address = {Poeng -
AF
WEB-PUBL
PluriCourts
multirights
Margin of Appreciation, European Court of Human Rights, Human Rights, Policy advice,,},
abstract = {For this session on accountability, four concerns about the ECtHR merit mention:
- the Court’s backlog of well-founded cases;
- allegations of overly dynamic interpretation by power-hungry judges;
- criticism that the Court abdicates by granting powerful states a margin of appreciation;
- criticism that the Court lacks due deference toward well-functioning democracies.
....},
keywords = {European Court of Human Rights, Human Rights, Margin of Appreciation},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
For this session on accountability, four concerns about the ECtHR merit mention:
– the Court’s backlog of well-founded cases;
– allegations of overly dynamic interpretation by power-hungry judges;
– criticism that the Court abdicates by granting powerful states a margin of appreciation;
– criticism that the Court lacks due deference toward well-functioning democracies.
…. |
Follesdal, Andreas: John Rawls’ Theory of Justice as Fairness. In: Fløistad, Guttorm (Ed.): Philosophy of Justice, pp. 311-328, Springer, Dordrecht, 2014. @inbook{RN49430,
title = {John Rawls' Theory of Justice as Fairness},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
editor = {Guttorm Fløistad},
url = {www.follesdal.net/ms/Follesdal-2014-Rawls-JasF.pdf},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-01-01},
booktitle = {Philosophy of Justice},
pages = {311-328},
publisher = {Springer},
address = {Dordrecht},
series = {Contemporary Philosophy: A new survey},
abstract = {When do citizens have a moral duty to obey the government and support the institutions of society? This question is central to political philosophy. One of the 20 century's main response was John Rawls' theory of justice, "Justice as fairness", in the book A Theory of Justice, published 1971. The book Justice as Fairness was an improved and shorter presentation of Rawls' theory, published 2001 with editorial support by Erin Kelly, one of his former students. ...This introduction of Rawls falls into eight parts. After a brief biographical introduction, Part 2 presents the allocation principles he advocated. Part 3 presents Rawls' conception of society and the individual, as an introduction to the rest of the argument presented in part 4 Section 5 takes up his theory of justification, and part 6 points to three areas where the more recent book Justice as Fairness differs somewhat from A Theory of Justice. Section 7 presents some of the criticisms that have been raised, and section 8 points to some lasting contributions of Rawls’ theory.},
keywords = {John Rawls},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
When do citizens have a moral duty to obey the government and support the institutions of society? This question is central to political philosophy. One of the 20 century’s main response was John Rawls’ theory of justice, “Justice as fairness”, in the book A Theory of Justice, published 1971. The book Justice as Fairness was an improved and shorter presentation of Rawls’ theory, published 2001 with editorial support by Erin Kelly, one of his former students. …This introduction of Rawls falls into eight parts. After a brief biographical introduction, Part 2 presents the allocation principles he advocated. Part 3 presents Rawls’ conception of society and the individual, as an introduction to the rest of the argument presented in part 4 Section 5 takes up his theory of justification, and part 6 points to three areas where the more recent book Justice as Fairness differs somewhat from A Theory of Justice. Section 7 presents some of the criticisms that have been raised, and section 8 points to some lasting contributions of Rawls’ theory. |
Follesdal, Andreas: Guiding and guarding international judges. In: New York University School of Law Journal of International Law and Politics, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 793-808, 2014. @article{RN49688,
title = {Guiding and guarding international judges},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
url = {http://www.follesdal.net/ms/Follesdal-2014-guide-guard.pdf},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-01-01},
journal = {New York University School of Law Journal of International Law and Politics},
volume = {46},
number = {3},
pages = {793-808},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Global Citizenship. In: Sterri, Aksel Braanen (Ed.): Global Citizen – Challenges and Responsibility in an Interconnected World, pp. 71-82, Sense, Rotterdam, 2014. @inbook{RN49722,
title = {Global Citizenship},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
editor = {Aksel Braanen Sterri},
url = {http://www.follesdal.net/ms/Follesdal-2014-global-citizenship.pdf},
year = {2014},
date = {2014-01-01},
booktitle = {Global Citizen – Challenges and Responsibility in an Interconnected World},
pages = {71-82},
publisher = {Sense},
address = {Rotterdam},
abstract = {Our actions and practices increasingly mutually affect others across territorial borders. Since these processes of globalization affect our opportunities and our possible impact, globalization also affects what we ought to do – as ‘global citizens’. The chapter explores some implications for our conceptions of citizenship beyond the state. Individuals should be able to exercise some democratic voting rights and some human rights vis-à-vis governance structures above the nation state under our conditions of globalization. After a brief overview including a historical backdrop, section 2 sketches some components of global citizenship, and section 3 considers several objections to this notion.},
keywords = {Human Rights},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
Our actions and practices increasingly mutually affect others across territorial borders. Since these processes of globalization affect our opportunities and our possible impact, globalization also affects what we ought to do – as ‘global citizens’. The chapter explores some implications for our conceptions of citizenship beyond the state. Individuals should be able to exercise some democratic voting rights and some human rights vis-à-vis governance structures above the nation state under our conditions of globalization. After a brief overview including a historical backdrop, section 2 sketches some components of global citizenship, and section 3 considers several objections to this notion. |
Føllesdal, Andreas: Om menneskerettighetserklæringen. 2013, (P1 radio). @misc{RN54610,
title = {Om menneskerettighetserklæringen},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {2013},
date = {2013-12-01},
publisher = {P1 radio},
note = {P1 radio},
keywords = {Service, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Religion and the State – the European Court of Human Rights and the ‘Lautsi’ case about crucifixes in Italian class rooms. 2013, (Arctic University of Norway Tromsø). @misc{RN54611,
title = {Religion and the State – the European Court of Human Rights and the ‘Lautsi' case about crucifixes in Italian class rooms},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2013},
date = {2013-12-01},
publisher = {Arctic University of Norway},
note = {Arctic University of Norway Tromsø},
keywords = {European Court of Human Rights, Human Rights, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: Menneskerettigheter og relativisme – Menneskerettigheter under press. 2013, (SV-fakultetet UiO). @misc{RN54612,
title = {Menneskerettigheter og relativisme – Menneskerettigheter under press},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {2013},
date = {2013-11-01},
publisher = {SV-fakultetet UiO},
note = {SV-fakultetet UiO},
keywords = {Human Rights, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Om proporsjonalitetsprinsippet i EMD. 2013, (Demokratiprogrammet, UiO Oslo). @misc{RN54617,
title = {Om proporsjonalitetsprinsippet i EMD},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2013},
date = {2013-10-01},
publisher = {Demokratiprogrammet, UiO},
note = {Demokratiprogrammet, UiO Oslo},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Om PluriCourts. 2013, (Nordic Network in Political Theory Oslo). @misc{RN54616,
title = {Om PluriCourts},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2013},
date = {2013-10-01},
publisher = {Nordic Network in Political Theory},
note = {Nordic Network in Political Theory Oslo},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Machiavelli’s ‘The Prince’ at 500 years: Lessons for international human rights courts. 2013, (Nordic Network in Political Theory Oslo). @misc{RN54615,
title = {Machiavelli's 'The Prince' at 500 years: Lessons for international human rights courts},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2013},
date = {2013-10-01},
publisher = {Nordic Network in Political Theory},
note = {Nordic Network in Political Theory Oslo},
keywords = {Human Rights, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Machiavelli’s lessons for International Courts. 2013, (International Association for Constitutional Law Workshop Florence). @misc{RN54619,
title = {Machiavelli’s lessons for International Courts},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2013},
date = {2013-10-01},
publisher = {International Association for Constitutional Law Workshop},
note = {International Association for Constitutional Law Workshop Florence},
keywords = {International courts, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: The Future of International Courts and Tribunals. 2013, (PluriCourts and New York University Workshop on The Function of Judges and Arbitrators in International Law New York). @misc{RN54618,
title = {The Future of International Courts and Tribunals},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2013},
date = {2013-10-01},
publisher = {PluriCourts and New York University Workshop on The Function of Judges and Arbitrators in International Law},
note = {PluriCourts and New York University Workshop on The Function of Judges and Arbitrators in International Law New York},
keywords = {International courts, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: About PluriCourts. 2013, (Norwegian Centre for Human Rights Oslo). @misc{RN54620,
title = {About PluriCourts},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2013},
date = {2013-10-01},
publisher = {Norwegian Centre for Human Rights},
note = {Norwegian Centre for Human Rights Oslo},
keywords = {Human Rights, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Legitimacy of International Courts. 2013, (PluriCourts Workshop on Concepts and Methods Oslo). @misc{RN54623,
title = {Legitimacy of International Courts},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2013},
date = {2013-09-01},
publisher = {PluriCourts Workshop on Concepts and Methods},
note = {PluriCourts Workshop on Concepts and Methods Oslo},
keywords = {International courts, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: The Claims of Indigenous Minorities to Self-determination over land and natural resources. 2013, (Centre for the Study of Mind in Nature – CSMN Workshop Oslo). @misc{RN54621,
title = {The Claims of Indigenous Minorities to Self-determination over land and natural resources},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2013},
date = {2013-09-01},
publisher = {Centre for the Study of Mind in Nature - CSMN Workshop},
note = {Centre for the Study of Mind in Nature - CSMN Workshop Oslo},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Applying to the ERC Starting Grants. 2013, (PluriCourts Academic Career Workshop Oslo). @misc{RN54622,
title = {Applying to the ERC Starting Grants},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2013},
date = {2013-09-01},
publisher = {PluriCourts Academic Career Workshop},
note = {PluriCourts Academic Career Workshop Oslo},
keywords = {ERC - European Research Council, Service, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Theories of Human Rights: Political or Moral – and why it matters. 2013, (World Congress of Philosophy Panel Athens). @misc{RN54624,
title = {Theories of Human Rights: Political or Moral – and why it matters},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2013},
date = {2013-08-01},
publisher = {World Congress of Philosophy Panel},
note = {World Congress of Philosophy Panel Athens},
keywords = {Human Rights, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Testing for proportionality: Protecting human rights and respecting sovereignty – or neither. 2013, (IVR Panel Belo Horizonte). @misc{RN54625,
title = {Testing for proportionality: Protecting human rights and respecting sovereignty – or neither},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2013},
date = {2013-07-01},
publisher = {IVR Panel},
note = {IVR Panel Belo Horizonte},
keywords = {Human Rights, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Winning ERC Grants. 2013, (UiO Oso). @misc{RN54629,
title = {Winning ERC Grants},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2013},
date = {2013-06-01},
publisher = {UiO},
note = {UiO Oso},
keywords = {ERC - European Research Council, Service, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Workshop on fragmentation of international human rights law. 2013, (Budapest). @misc{RN54630,
title = {Workshop on fragmentation of international human rights law},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2013},
date = {2013-05-01},
note = {Budapest},
keywords = {Human Rights, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Conference in honor of James Nickel. 2013, (Duke University Durham, NC). @misc{RN54631,
title = {Conference in honor of James Nickel},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2013},
date = {2013-03-01},
publisher = {Duke University},
note = {Duke University Durham, NC},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: A Common European Identity for European Citizenship?. 2013, (Uppsala University Workshop on European Citizenship 20 Years On Uppsala). @misc{RN54632,
title = {A Common European Identity for European Citizenship?},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2013},
date = {2013-03-01},
publisher = {Uppsala University Workshop on European Citizenship 20 Years On},
note = {Uppsala University Workshop on European Citizenship 20 Years On Uppsala},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: About PluriCourts. 2013, (Department of Political Science, Stockholm University Stockholm). @misc{RN54633,
title = {About PluriCourts},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2013},
date = {2013-03-01},
publisher = {Department of Political Science, Stockholm University},
note = {Department of Political Science, Stockholm University Stockholm},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: The Margin of Appreciation. 2013, (Arctic University of Norway Tromsø). @misc{RN54634,
title = {The Margin of Appreciation},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2013},
date = {2013-01-01},
publisher = {Arctic University of Norway},
note = {Arctic University of Norway Tromsø},
keywords = {Margin of Appreciation, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Schaffer, Johan Karlsson; Follesdal, Andreas; Ulfstein, Geir: International human rights and the challenge of legitimacy. In: Follesdal, Andreas; Schaffer, Johan; Ulfstein, Geir (Ed.): The Legitimacy of International Human Rights Regimes, pp. 1-30, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2013. @inbook{RN49803,
title = {International human rights and the challenge of legitimacy},
author = {Johan Karlsson Schaffer and Andreas Follesdal and Geir Ulfstein},
editor = {Andreas Follesdal and Johan Schaffer and Geir Ulfstein},
url = {http://www.follesdal.net/ms/Follesdal-2013-Schaffer-Ulfstein-hr-challenges-legitimacy.rtf},
year = {2013},
date = {2013-01-01},
booktitle = {The Legitimacy of International Human Rights Regimes},
pages = {1-30},
publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
address = {Cambridge},
abstract = {The practices and institutions of international human rights would seem to enjoy, on average, a broad, strong legitimacy in the contemporary world. And yet, on the other hand, international human rights practices increasingly face potentially disabling skepticism and critique, resentment and even resistance...this volume ... contributes to an increasingly lively research literature spanning the disciplines of law, philosophy, political science and international relations. This introductory chapter serves, first, to give some examples of the type of political controversies over international human rights regimes that motivate this volume; second, to place the volume in current academic debates about international human rights and about the legitimate authority of international institutions; and thirdly, to outline the topics covered in the individual contributions. ..},
keywords = {Human Rights},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
The practices and institutions of international human rights would seem to enjoy, on average, a broad, strong legitimacy in the contemporary world. And yet, on the other hand, international human rights practices increasingly face potentially disabling skepticism and critique, resentment and even resistance…this volume … contributes to an increasingly lively research literature spanning the disciplines of law, philosophy, political science and international relations. This introductory chapter serves, first, to give some examples of the type of political controversies over international human rights regimes that motivate this volume; second, to place the volume in current academic debates about international human rights and about the legitimate authority of international institutions; and thirdly, to outline the topics covered in the individual contributions. .. |
Follesdal, Andreas; Schaffer, Johan; Ulfstein, Geir: The Legitimacy of International Human Rights Regimes: Legal, Political and Philosophical Perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2013. @book{RN49346,
title = {The Legitimacy of International Human Rights Regimes: Legal, Political and Philosophical Perspectives},
author = {Andreas Follesdal and Johan Schaffer and Geir Ulfstein},
url = {http://www.cambridge.org/asia/catalogue/catalogue.asp?isbn=9781107034600},
year = {2013},
date = {2013-01-01},
publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
address = {Cambridge},
abstract = {this book brings together prominent scholars in law, political philosophy and international relations in order to address the legitimacy of international human rights regimes as a theoretically challenging and politically salient case of international authority. It provides a unique and thorough overview of the legitimacy problems involved in the global governance of human rights.},
keywords = {Edited books, Human Rights},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {book}
}
this book brings together prominent scholars in law, political philosophy and international relations in order to address the legitimacy of international human rights regimes as a theoretically challenging and politically salient case of international authority. It provides a unique and thorough overview of the legitimacy problems involved in the global governance of human rights. |
Follesdal, Andreas; Peters, Birgit; Ulfstein, Geir: Introduction. In: Follesdal, Andreas; Peters, Birgit; Ulfstein, Geir (Ed.): Constituting Europe: The European Court of Human Rights in a National, European and Global Context, pp. 1-24, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2013. @inbook{RN49579,
title = {Introduction},
author = {Andreas Follesdal and Birgit Peters and Geir Ulfstein},
editor = {Andreas Follesdal and Birgit Peters and Geir Ulfstein},
url = {www.follesdal.net/ms/Follesdal-2013-Peters-Ulfstein-introduction.rtf},
doi = {http://www.cambridge.org/gb/knowledge/isbn/item7099150/?site_locale=en_GB},
year = {2013},
date = {2013-01-01},
booktitle = {Constituting Europe: The European Court of Human Rights in a National, European and Global Context},
pages = {1-24},
publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
address = {Cambridge},
series = {Studies on Human Rights Conventions},
abstract = {This book examines the new institutional settings of the Court. Few contributions have hitherto concentrated on these multiple relationships of the ECtHR.... The book aims to assess the relationship between the Court and the member states, the EU, the UN and the other organs of the Council of Europe, partly by referring to a specific set of normative criteria, and taking into consideration their respective needs and their own institutional functions. It seeks to provide a coherent overview and some more principled answers to the current reform debate and future design of the Court and of its relationship to the national, European and global level. The book's main areas of consideration and main objectives are outlined in the following sections...},
keywords = {European Court of Human Rights, Human Rights},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
This book examines the new institutional settings of the Court. Few contributions have hitherto concentrated on these multiple relationships of the ECtHR…. The book aims to assess the relationship between the Court and the member states, the EU, the UN and the other organs of the Council of Europe, partly by referring to a specific set of normative criteria, and taking into consideration their respective needs and their own institutional functions. It seeks to provide a coherent overview and some more principled answers to the current reform debate and future design of the Court and of its relationship to the national, European and global level. The book’s main areas of consideration and main objectives are outlined in the following sections… |
Follesdal, Andreas; Peters, Birgit; Ulfstein, Geir: Constituting Europe: The European Court of Human Rights in a national, European and global context. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2013. @book{RN49345,
title = {Constituting Europe: The European Court of Human Rights in a national, European and global context},
author = {Andreas Follesdal and Birgit Peters and Geir Ulfstein},
url = {http://www.cambridge.org/gb/knowledge/isbn/item7099150/?site_locale=en_GB},
year = {2013},
date = {2013-01-01},
publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
address = {Cambridge},
series = {Studies on Human Rights Conventions},
abstract = {At fifty, the European Court of Human Rights finds itself in a new institutional setting. With the EU joining the European Convention on Human Rights in the near future, and the Court increasingly having to address the responsibility of states in UN-lead military operations, the Court faces important challenges at the national, European and international levels. In light of recent reform discussions, this volume addresses the multi-level relations of the Court by drawing on existing debates, pointing to current deficits and highlighting the need for further improvements.},
keywords = {Edited books, European Court of Human Rights, Human Rights},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {book}
}
At fifty, the European Court of Human Rights finds itself in a new institutional setting. With the EU joining the European Convention on Human Rights in the near future, and the Court increasingly having to address the responsibility of states in UN-lead military operations, the Court faces important challenges at the national, European and international levels. In light of recent reform discussions, this volume addresses the multi-level relations of the Court by drawing on existing debates, pointing to current deficits and highlighting the need for further improvements. |
Follesdal, Andreas; Peters, Birgit; Ulfstein, Geir: Conclusions. In: Follesdal, Andreas; Peters, Birgit; Ulfstein, Geir (Ed.): Constituting Europe: The European Court of Human Rights in a National, European and Global Context, pp. 389-402, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2013. @inbook{RN49580,
title = {Conclusions},
author = {Andreas Follesdal and Birgit Peters and Geir Ulfstein},
editor = {Andreas Follesdal and Birgit Peters and Geir Ulfstein},
url = {www.follesdal.net/ms/Follesdal-2013-Peters-Ulfstein-conclusions.rtf},
doi = {http://www.cambridge.org/gb/knowledge/isbn/item7099150/?site_locale=en_GB},
year = {2013},
date = {2013-01-01},
booktitle = {Constituting Europe: The European Court of Human Rights in a National, European and Global Context},
pages = {389-402},
publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
address = {Cambridge},
series = {Studies on Human Rights Conventions},
abstract = {...the member states, the organs of the Council of Europe - including the Court itself - the EU and, possibly, the UN, are still seeking to calibrate and develop the ECtHR’s legitimacy within the European sphere of fundamental rights. .... , it is difficult to deny the ECtHR’s constitutional role in its relations with the member states. This is not to say that the ECtHR is formally embedded in the general judicial review structure at the member state levels. Nonetheless, it decides on the compatibility of legislative as well as administrative and judicial acts with the Convention. Pilot judgment cases, in particular, may entail a declaration of incompatibility of particular legal provisions with the Convention ... The Court's Legitimacy..... Development and further solutions ... The Future...},
keywords = {European Court of Human Rights, Human Rights},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
…the member states, the organs of the Council of Europe – including the Court itself – the EU and, possibly, the UN, are still seeking to calibrate and develop the ECtHR’s legitimacy within the European sphere of fundamental rights. …. , it is difficult to deny the ECtHR’s constitutional role in its relations with the member states. This is not to say that the ECtHR is formally embedded in the general judicial review structure at the member state levels. Nonetheless, it decides on the compatibility of legislative as well as administrative and judicial acts with the Convention. Pilot judgment cases, in particular, may entail a declaration of incompatibility of particular legal provisions with the Convention … The Court’s Legitimacy….. Development and further solutions … The Future… |
Follesdal, Andreas: Much ado about Nothing? International Judicial Review of Human Rights in Well Functioning Democracies. In: Follesdal, Andreas; Schaffer, Johan; Ulfstein, Geir (Ed.): The Legitimacy of International Human Rights Regimes, pp. 272-299, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2013. @inbook{RN49403,
title = {Much ado about Nothing? International Judicial Review of Human Rights in Well Functioning Democracies},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
editor = {Andreas Follesdal and Johan Schaffer and Geir Ulfstein},
url = {http://www.follesdal.net/ms/Follesdal-2013-intl-review-democracies.rtf},
year = {2013},
date = {2013-01-01},
booktitle = {The Legitimacy of International Human Rights Regimes},
pages = {272-299},
publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
address = {Cambridge},
abstract = {The chapter addresses some of the tensions between sovereignty, international human rights review and legitimacy, and bring these findings to bear on the proposals for reform of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) that would reduce its authority over national legislatures and judiciaries. The objectives of such review are not obvious, the causes of noncompliance are contested, as is the legality of dynamic treaty interpretation; all of which hamper efforts to assess proposed improvements. Section 1 presents some relevant aspects of the ECtHR. Section 2 reviews some of the recent criticism against the ECtHR practice of judicial review to protect human rights in ‘well-functioning’ democracies, in terms of various forms of legitimacy deficits. It also presents some of the recent proposals for reform of the ECtHR. Section 3 lays out some reasons why such judicial review of majoritarian democratic decision-making may be defensible, also for well functioning democracies. Section 4 responds to some of the criticisms, and presents a partial defence. Some standard objections are not well targeted against the practices of the ECtHR, partly due to the division of responsibility between it and national public bodies, and the different roles of legislators and of judiciaries. Section 5 returns to the proposals presented in section 2. Section 6 concludes by considering some of the important remaining normative challenges, this partial defence notwithstanding.},
keywords = {European Court of Human Rights, Human Rights},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
The chapter addresses some of the tensions between sovereignty, international human rights review and legitimacy, and bring these findings to bear on the proposals for reform of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) that would reduce its authority over national legislatures and judiciaries. The objectives of such review are not obvious, the causes of noncompliance are contested, as is the legality of dynamic treaty interpretation; all of which hamper efforts to assess proposed improvements. Section 1 presents some relevant aspects of the ECtHR. Section 2 reviews some of the recent criticism against the ECtHR practice of judicial review to protect human rights in ‘well-functioning’ democracies, in terms of various forms of legitimacy deficits. It also presents some of the recent proposals for reform of the ECtHR. Section 3 lays out some reasons why such judicial review of majoritarian democratic decision-making may be defensible, also for well functioning democracies. Section 4 responds to some of the criticisms, and presents a partial defence. Some standard objections are not well targeted against the practices of the ECtHR, partly due to the division of responsibility between it and national public bodies, and the different roles of legislators and of judiciaries. Section 5 returns to the proposals presented in section 2. Section 6 concludes by considering some of the important remaining normative challenges, this partial defence notwithstanding. |
Follesdal, Andreas: Much Ado about Nothing? Claims about political appointment to the Norwegian Supreme Court – and what to do – and not to do – about it. In: Tidsskrift for rettsvitenskap, no. 3, pp. 365-371, 2013, (Grendstad). @article{RN49509,
title = {Much Ado about Nothing? Claims about political appointment to the Norwegian Supreme Court - and what to do - and not to do - about it},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
url = {Follesdal-2013-Supreme-court-appointments.rtf},
doi = {http://www.idunn.no/ts/tfr/2013/03/much_ado_about_nothing_claims_about_political_appointment_},
year = {2013},
date = {2013-01-01},
journal = {Tidsskrift for rettsvitenskap},
number = {3},
pages = {365-371},
abstract = {Should recent reports of political appointments of Norwegian Supreme Court judges give rise to concern and reform of the process, e.g. toward more explicitly politicized hearings or vetting of nominees? Renewed attention to the patterns of political and ideological leanings among these judges should be welcome, and some observed patterns seem plausible. Insofar as such patterns can be identified, it may seem misplaced to criticize Grendstad et al for overlooking the differences in procedures for selecting judges and the different judicial cultures, e.g. between the US and Norway. If there are statistically significant correlations, the appropriate response may well be to explore possible mechanisms – different from those in full view in the US.
But the recent research findings that allege a politicized appointment process can be improved in at least two ways. I shall argue in section 1 that the evidence Grendstad et al present for such ‘political’ appointments is weak. Section 2 suggests that more dimensions than political right-left merit more attention partly due to the internationalization of the judiciary. In conclusion, I suggest that these comments should not diminish but rather increase the need for further research on the political and other ideological bias of the Norwegian Supreme Court – as of other parts of the domestic, regional and international judiciary. The appointment process and voting patterns of Supreme Court justices merit more public attention, e.g. as argued by present Chief Justice Schei – though not for the reasons claimed by Grendstad et al.},
note = {Grendstad},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Should recent reports of political appointments of Norwegian Supreme Court judges give rise to concern and reform of the process, e.g. toward more explicitly politicized hearings or vetting of nominees? Renewed attention to the patterns of political and ideological leanings among these judges should be welcome, and some observed patterns seem plausible. Insofar as such patterns can be identified, it may seem misplaced to criticize Grendstad et al for overlooking the differences in procedures for selecting judges and the different judicial cultures, e.g. between the US and Norway. If there are statistically significant correlations, the appropriate response may well be to explore possible mechanisms – different from those in full view in the US.
But the recent research findings that allege a politicized appointment process can be improved in at least two ways. I shall argue in section 1 that the evidence Grendstad et al present for such ‘political’ appointments is weak. Section 2 suggests that more dimensions than political right-left merit more attention partly due to the internationalization of the judiciary. In conclusion, I suggest that these comments should not diminish but rather increase the need for further research on the political and other ideological bias of the Norwegian Supreme Court – as of other parts of the domestic, regional and international judiciary. The appointment process and voting patterns of Supreme Court justices merit more public attention, e.g. as argued by present Chief Justice Schei – though not for the reasons claimed by Grendstad et al. |
Follesdal, Andreas: The Legitimacy Deficits of the Human Rights Judiciary: Elements and Implications of a Normative Theory. In: Theoretical Inquiries in Law, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 339-360, 2013. @article{RN49341,
title = {The Legitimacy Deficits of the Human Rights Judiciary: Elements and Implications of a Normative Theory},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
url = {http://www.follesdal.net/ms/Follesdal-2013-leg-deficits-hr-theor-inq.rtf},
doi = {http://www.follesdal.net/ms/Follesdal-2013-leg-deficits-hr-theor-inq.pdf
DOI: 10.1515/til-2013-018},
year = {2013},
date = {2013-01-01},
journal = {Theoretical Inquiries in Law},
volume = {14},
number = {2},
pages = {339-360},
abstract = {The Article addresses some of the disagreement concerning the legitimacy of the international human rights judiciary. It lays out some aspects of a theory of legitimacy for the international human rights judiciary that seem relevant to addressing two challenges: First, it is difficult to justify the human rights judiciary by appeal to standard accounts of why states agree to subject themselves to treaties. What is the problem the international human rights judiciary is meant to help solve? Second, the human rights judiciary seems undemocratic and even antidemocratic when it overrules domestic, accountable legislatures. Such international judicial review is therefore sometimes thought to be normatively illegitimate, at least regarding democracies.},
keywords = {Human Rights},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
The Article addresses some of the disagreement concerning the legitimacy of the international human rights judiciary. It lays out some aspects of a theory of legitimacy for the international human rights judiciary that seem relevant to addressing two challenges: First, it is difficult to justify the human rights judiciary by appeal to standard accounts of why states agree to subject themselves to treaties. What is the problem the international human rights judiciary is meant to help solve? Second, the human rights judiciary seems undemocratic and even antidemocratic when it overrules domestic, accountable legislatures. Such international judicial review is therefore sometimes thought to be normatively illegitimate, at least regarding democracies. |
Follesdal, Andreas: Religion and the State – the European Court of Human Rights and the ‘Lautsi’ case about crucifixes in Italian class rooms. 2013, (MultiRights). @misc{RN54613,
title = {Religion and the State – the European Court of Human Rights and the ‘Lautsi' case about crucifixes in Italian class rooms},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2013},
date = {2013-00-01},
publisher = {MultiRights},
note = {MultiRights},
keywords = {European Court of Human Rights, Human Rights, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: A more democratic European Union? Symptoms, Diagnosis, Prescriptions and Prognosis. 2012, (London School of Economics Workshop: Is EU democracy possible? London). @misc{RN54635,
title = {A more democratic European Union? Symptoms, Diagnosis, Prescriptions and Prognosis},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2012},
date = {2012-12-01},
publisher = {London School of Economics Workshop: Is EU democracy possible?},
note = {London School of Economics Workshop: Is EU democracy possible? London},
keywords = {Democratic theory, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Comments. 2012, (Conference on Nordic Paradox Oslo). @misc{RN54636,
title = {Comments},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2012},
date = {2012-12-01},
publisher = {Conference on Nordic Paradox},
note = {Conference on Nordic Paradox Oslo},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: The Principle of Subsidiarity as a Constitutional Principle in International Law. 2012, (Conference on Constitutional Jurisprudence – Function, Impact, and Challenges Bangkok). @misc{RN54637,
title = {The Principle of Subsidiarity as a Constitutional Principle in International Law},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2012},
date = {2012-11-01},
publisher = {Conference on Constitutional Jurisprudence – Function, Impact, and Challenges},
note = {Conference on Constitutional Jurisprudence – Function, Impact, and Challenges Bangkok},
keywords = {Subsidiarity, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Human rights and democracy – On comparing the ECtHR and the Inter-American human rights system. 2012, (Norwegian Institute in Athens Democracy Conference Athens). @misc{RN54639,
title = {Human rights and democracy - On comparing the ECtHR and the Inter-American human rights system},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2012},
date = {2012-11-01},
publisher = {Norwegian Institute in Athens Democracy Conference},
note = {Norwegian Institute in Athens Democracy Conference Athens},
keywords = {Democratic theory, Human Rights, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Two Domains of Health Global Health – legitimacy. 2012, (Oslo). @misc{RN54641,
title = {Two Domains of Health Global Health – legitimacy},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2012},
date = {2012-10-01},
note = {Oslo},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Two Democratic Concepts of European Public Spheres. 2012, (Arctic University of Norway Tromsø). @misc{RN54640,
title = {Two Democratic Concepts of European Public Spheres},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2012},
date = {2012-10-01},
publisher = {Arctic University of Norway},
note = {Arctic University of Norway Tromsø},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Is there an Elephant in the Room? Are Concepts of Legitimacy Related, and How?. 2012, (iCourts Copenhagen). @misc{RN54643,
title = {Is there an Elephant in the Room? Are Concepts of Legitimacy Related, and How?},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2012},
date = {2012-09-01},
publisher = {iCourts},
note = {iCourts Copenhagen},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: [No title]. 2012, (Workshop on Postnational rule making Amsterdam). @misc{RN54642,
title = {[No title]},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2012},
date = {2012-09-01},
publisher = {Workshop on Postnational rule making},
note = {Workshop on Postnational rule making Amsterdam},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: Hvis det norske forbudet mot dobbelt statsborgerskap er løsningen, hva er problemet?. 2012, (Forfatningshistorisk seminar om Grunnlova Oslo). @misc{RN54644,
title = {Hvis det norske forbudet mot dobbelt statsborgerskap er løsningen, hva er problemet?},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {2012},
date = {2012-08-01},
publisher = {Forfatningshistorisk seminar om Grunnlova},
note = {Forfatningshistorisk seminar om Grunnlova Oslo},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: On Federalism in Nepal’s constitution. 2012, (Norwegian Centre for Human Rights for Nepal Election Commission Oslo). @misc{RN54645,
title = {On Federalism in Nepal’s constitution},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2012},
date = {2012-08-01},
publisher = {Norwegian Centre for Human Rights for Nepal Election Commission},
note = {Norwegian Centre for Human Rights for Nepal Election Commission Oslo},
keywords = {Federalism, Human Rights, Nepal, Public policy, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: The Legitimacy Deficits of Human Rights Supervisory Organs – the Human Rights Judiciary. 2012, (IPSA Panel Madrid). @misc{RN54646,
title = {The Legitimacy Deficits of Human Rights Supervisory Organs – the Human Rights Judiciary},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2012},
date = {2012-07-01},
publisher = {IPSA Panel},
note = {IPSA Panel Madrid},
keywords = {Human Rights, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: The Legitimacy of international (human rights) courts. 2012, (Hebrew University Conference on International Courts and the Quest for Legitimacy Jerusalem). @misc{RN54647,
title = {The Legitimacy of international (human rights) courts},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2012},
date = {2012-06-01},
publisher = {Hebrew University Conference on International Courts and the Quest for Legitimacy},
note = {Hebrew University Conference on International Courts and the Quest for Legitimacy Jerusalem},
keywords = {Human Rights, International courts, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: Er mediene del av løsningen på tillitskrisen, eller del av problemet?. 2012, (UiO Partnerforum Oslo). @misc{RN54649,
title = {Er mediene del av løsningen på tillitskrisen, eller del av problemet?},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {2012},
date = {2012-05-01},
publisher = {UiO Partnerforum},
note = {UiO Partnerforum Oslo},
keywords = {Policy advice, Service, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: The Legitimacy of the international human rights judiciary. 2012, (MultiRights Seminar Oslo). @misc{RN54650,
title = {The Legitimacy of the international human rights judiciary},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2012},
date = {2012-05-01},
publisher = {MultiRights Seminar},
note = {MultiRights Seminar Oslo},
keywords = {Human Rights, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: The Legitimacy of International human rights courts and treaty bodies. 2012, (University of Bucharest Conference on Global Justice: Norms and Limits Bucharest). @misc{RN54651,
title = {The Legitimacy of International human rights courts and treaty bodies},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2012},
date = {2012-05-01},
publisher = {University of Bucharest Conference on Global Justice: Norms and Limits},
note = {University of Bucharest Conference on Global Justice: Norms and Limits Bucharest},
keywords = {Human Rights, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Human Rights, Corporate Complicity and Disinvestment. 2012, (UiO Book Launch). @misc{RN54652,
title = {Human Rights, Corporate Complicity and Disinvestment},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2012},
date = {2012-05-01},
publisher = {UiO Book Launch},
note = {UiO Book Launch},
keywords = {Human Rights, SRI - Socially responsible investing, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: Om religion i det offentlige rom: Krusifiksdommen. 2012, (Litteraturhuset Oslo). @misc{RN54654,
title = {Om religion i det offentlige rom: Krusifiksdommen},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {2012},
date = {2012-03-01},
publisher = {Litteraturhuset},
note = {Litteraturhuset Oslo},
keywords = {Policy advice, Service, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
