Follesdal, Andreas: On authorship of joint publications – disciplines, hierarchy and gender. 2018, (University of Graz Graz). @misc{RN54467,
title = {On authorship of joint publications – disciplines, hierarchy and gender},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-12-01},
publisher = {University of Graz},
note = {University of Graz Graz},
keywords = {Gender, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: The comparative advantages of international courts for managing global public goods. 2018, (Working group on Climate Change, University of Graz Graz). @misc{RN54465,
title = {The comparative advantages of international courts for managing global public goods},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-12-01},
publisher = {Working group on Climate Change, University of Graz},
note = {Working group on Climate Change, University of Graz Graz},
keywords = {Climate, International courts, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: Humanistisk forskning: teori-drevet heller enn empiri-fokusert?. 2018, (Norges forskningsråd Oslo). @misc{RN54470,
title = {Humanistisk forskning: teori-drevet heller enn empiri-fokusert?},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-11-01},
publisher = {Norges forskningsråd},
note = {Norges forskningsråd Oslo},
keywords = {Research policy, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Stability in ethnic territorial federations with a secession clause – challenges and opportunities in the case of Ethiopia. 2018, (Arctic University of Norway Workshop Copenhagen). @misc{RN54472,
title = {Stability in ethnic territorial federations with a secession clause – challenges and opportunities in the case of Ethiopia},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-11-01},
publisher = {Arctic University of Norway Workshop},
note = {Arctic University of Norway Workshop Copenhagen},
keywords = {Federalism, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Stability in ethnic territorial federations with a secession clause – challenges and opportunities in the case of Ethiopia. 2018, (University of Makele Workshop Makele). @misc{RN54469,
title = {Stability in ethnic territorial federations with a secession clause – challenges and opportunities in the case of Ethiopia},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-11-01},
publisher = {University of Makele Workshop},
note = {University of Makele Workshop Makele},
keywords = {Federalism, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Natural law theories and international law”. 2018, (University of Liverpool Workshop Liverpool). @misc{RN54471,
title = {Natural law theories and international law”},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-11-01},
publisher = {University of Liverpool Workshop},
note = {University of Liverpool Workshop Liverpool},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: Forholdet mellom EMD og nasjonale domstoler. 2018, (Domstolsadministrasjonen Kurs for dommere Gardermoen). @misc{RN54474,
title = {Forholdet mellom EMD og nasjonale domstoler},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-10-01},
publisher = {Domstolsadministrasjonen Kurs for dommere},
note = {Domstolsadministrasjonen Kurs for dommere Gardermoen},
keywords = {Service, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: ERC-application workshops as a task for ‘The Guild of Research Universities”. 2018, (UiO Presentation Oslo). @misc{RN54473,
title = {ERC-application workshops as a task for ‘The Guild of Research Universities”},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-10-01},
publisher = {UiO Presentation},
note = {UiO Presentation Oslo},
keywords = {ERC - European Research Council, Service, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: The significance of state consent. 2018, (American Political Science Association – APSA Panel Boston). @misc{RN54481,
title = {The significance of state consent},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-09-01},
publisher = {American Political Science Association - APSA Panel},
note = {American Political Science Association - APSA Panel Boston},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: The Significance of State Consent. 2018, (Variable authority of International Courts, Conference Frankfurt). @misc{RN54475,
title = {The Significance of State Consent},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-09-01},
publisher = {Variable authority of International Courts, Conference},
note = {Variable authority of International Courts, Conference Frankfurt},
keywords = {International courts, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Majoritarian Populism Versus Minority Rights Protection – How Might International Courts Respond?. 2018, (Arctic University of Norway Workshop Tromsø). @misc{RN54480,
title = {Majoritarian Populism Versus Minority Rights Protection – How Might International Courts Respond?},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-09-01},
publisher = {Arctic University of Norway Workshop},
note = {Arctic University of Norway Workshop Tromsø},
keywords = {International courts, Populism, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Majoritarian Populism Versus Minority Rights Protection – How Might International Courts Respond?. 2018, (Department of Political Science, UiO Oslo). @misc{RN54479,
title = {Majoritarian Populism Versus Minority Rights Protection – How Might International Courts Respond?},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-09-01},
publisher = {Department of Political Science, UiO},
note = {Department of Political Science, UiO Oslo},
keywords = {International courts, Populism, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Current contributions of the natural law tradition to international law”. 2018, (PluriCourts Seminar Oslo). @misc{RN54478,
title = {Current contributions of the natural law tradition to international law”},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-09-01},
publisher = {PluriCourts Seminar},
note = {PluriCourts Seminar Oslo},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: [No title]. 2018, (The European Court of Human Rights and PluriCourts Workshop Strasbourg). @misc{RN54477,
title = {[No title]},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-09-01},
publisher = {The European Court of Human Rights and PluriCourts Workshop},
note = {The European Court of Human Rights and PluriCourts Workshop Strasbourg},
keywords = {European Court of Human Rights, Human Rights, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Natural law theories and international law”. 2018, (ECPR Panel Hamburg). @misc{RN54482,
title = {Natural law theories and international law”},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-08-01},
publisher = {ECPR Panel},
note = {ECPR Panel Hamburg},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Majoritarian Populism Versus Minority Rights Protection – How Might International Courts Respond?”. 2018, (World Congress of Philosophy Panel on political philosophy Beijing). @misc{RN54484,
title = {Majoritarian Populism Versus Minority Rights Protection – How Might International Courts Respond?”},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-08-01},
publisher = {World Congress of Philosophy Panel on political philosophy},
note = {World Congress of Philosophy Panel on political philosophy Beijing},
keywords = {International courts, Populism, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Insights of Populism. 2018, (World Congress of Philosophy Panel on populist nationalism, current international institutions, world government, or global federalism? Beijing). @misc{RN54483,
title = {Insights of Populism},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-08-01},
publisher = {World Congress of Philosophy Panel on populist nationalism, current international institutions, world government, or global federalism?},
note = {World Congress of Philosophy Panel on populist nationalism, current international institutions, world government, or global federalism? Beijing},
keywords = {Federalism, Populism, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: On The Internationalists. 2018, (Journal of Global Constitutionalism Workshop Berlin). @misc{RN54485,
title = {On The Internationalists},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-07-01},
publisher = {Journal of Global Constitutionalism Workshop},
note = {Journal of Global Constitutionalism Workshop Berlin},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: The role of international courts for global public goods. 2018, (PluriCourts Workshop on Global Public Goods Oslo). @misc{RN54487,
title = {The role of international courts for global public goods},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-06-01},
publisher = {PluriCourts Workshop on Global Public Goods},
note = {PluriCourts Workshop on Global Public Goods Oslo},
keywords = {Climate, International courts, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: On the Margin of Appreciation doctrine –regional comparisons”. 2018, (International Journal of Constitutional Law ICON Panel Hong Kong). @misc{RN54486,
title = {On the Margin of Appreciation doctrine –regional comparisons”},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-06-01},
publisher = {International Journal of Constitutional Law ICON Panel},
note = {International Journal of Constitutional Law ICON Panel Hong Kong},
keywords = {Margin of Appreciation, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: [No title]. 2018, (Arctic University of Norway Workshop Tromsø). @misc{RN54489,
title = {[No title]},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-06-01},
publisher = {Arctic University of Norway Workshop},
note = {Arctic University of Norway Workshop Tromsø},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: [No title]. 2018, (PluriCourts Philosophy and Legal theory workshop Oslo). @misc{RN54488,
title = {[No title]},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-06-01},
publisher = {PluriCourts Philosophy and Legal theory workshop},
note = {PluriCourts Philosophy and Legal theory workshop Oslo},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Why defer to a new MultiLateral Investment Court? – Three Themes. 2018, (EU Commission On the design of a Multilateral Investment Court Brussels). @misc{RN54491,
title = {Why defer to a new MultiLateral Investment Court? - Three Themes},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-05-01},
publisher = {EU Commission On the design of a Multilateral Investment Court},
note = {EU Commission On the design of a Multilateral Investment Court Brussels},
keywords = {Public policy, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Protecting and Promoting Universal, European or Western European Human Rights?. 2018, (Conference on the ECHR in East-West Relations: Norms, Values and Legal Politics Moscow). @misc{RN54492,
title = {Protecting and Promoting Universal, European or Western European Human Rights?},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-05-01},
publisher = {Conference on the ECHR in East-West Relations: Norms, Values and Legal Politics},
note = {Conference on the ECHR in East-West Relations: Norms, Values and Legal Politics Moscow},
keywords = {Human Rights, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: On The new legitimation challenges to international courts – and how they might respond. 2018, (PluriCourts Brandeis-PluriCourts workshop for international judges Oslo). @misc{RN54490,
title = {On The new legitimation challenges to international courts – and how they might respond},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-05-01},
publisher = {PluriCourts Brandeis-PluriCourts workshop for international judges},
note = {PluriCourts Brandeis-PluriCourts workshop for international judges Oslo},
keywords = {International courts, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Human rights in ‘other’ international courts – some issues of legitimacy. 2018, (European University Institute – EUI Workshop on human rights in non-human rights courts Florence). @misc{RN54494,
title = {Human rights in ‘other’ international courts – some issues of legitimacy},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-04-01},
publisher = {European University Institute - EUI Workshop on human rights in non-human rights courts},
note = {European University Institute - EUI Workshop on human rights in non-human rights courts Florence},
keywords = {Human Rights, International courts, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Majoritarian Populism versus Minority Rights Protection – how might international courts respond?. 2018, (Arctic University of Norway Workshop Tromsø). @misc{RN54495,
title = {Majoritarian Populism versus Minority Rights Protection – how might international courts respond?},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-03-01},
publisher = {Arctic University of Norway Workshop},
note = {Arctic University of Norway Workshop Tromsø},
keywords = {International courts, Populism, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Subsidiarity as a general principle of international law?. 2018, (Conference on ‘General Principles of Law – in National, European and International Law’ Paris). @misc{RN54497,
title = {Subsidiarity as a general principle of international law?},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-02-01},
publisher = {Conference on ‘General Principles of Law – in National, European and International Law’},
note = {Conference on ‘General Principles of Law – in National, European and International Law’ Paris},
keywords = {Subsidiarity, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Improving the European Consensus Doctrine: A Better Signpost, Not a Better Walking Stick. 2018, (European Court of Human Rights Workshop Strasbourg). @misc{RN54498,
title = {Improving the European Consensus Doctrine: A Better Signpost, Not a Better Walking Stick},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-02-01},
publisher = {European Court of Human Rights Workshop},
note = {European Court of Human Rights Workshop Strasbourg},
keywords = {European Consensus, European Court of Human Rights, Human Rights, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Better signposts or better walking sticks? How to improve the Emerging European Consensus doctrine of the European Court of Human Rights – and Why?. 2018, (PluriCourts Seminar Oslo). @misc{RN54496,
title = {Better signposts or better walking sticks? How to improve the Emerging European Consensus doctrine of the European Court of Human Rights - and Why?},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-02-01},
publisher = {PluriCourts Seminar},
note = {PluriCourts Seminar Oslo},
keywords = {European Consensus, European Court of Human Rights, Human Rights, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Are concepts of legitimacy for international courts related, and how?. 2018, (Stockholm University Seminar, Political Theory Group Stockholm). @misc{RN54499,
title = {Are concepts of legitimacy for international courts related, and how?},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-01-01},
publisher = {Stockholm University Seminar, Political Theory Group},
note = {Stockholm University Seminar, Political Theory Group Stockholm},
keywords = {International courts, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Ryssevik, Jostein; Føllesdal, Andreas; Thorsen, Dag Einar; Aubert, Axel: Politikk og menneskerettigheter. Aschehoug, Oslo, 2018. @book{RN51004,
title = {Politikk og menneskerettigheter},
author = {Jostein Ryssevik and Andreas Føllesdal and Dag Einar Thorsen and Axel Aubert},
url = {https://www.aschehoug.no/Undervisning/Verk/Sosiologi-og-sosialantropologi-Sosialkunnskap-Politikk-og-menneskerettigheter},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-01-01},
publisher = {Aschehoug},
address = {Oslo},
series = {Fokus - lærebok for videregående skole},
keywords = {Human Rights},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {book}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: The legitimacy critiques of international courts – beyond a taxonomy. 2017, (UiO PPWG workshop Oslo). @misc{RN54500,
title = {The legitimacy critiques of international courts – beyond a taxonomy},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-11-01},
publisher = {UiO PPWG workshop},
note = {UiO PPWG workshop Oslo},
keywords = {International courts, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: Hvordan få forskergruppen til å lykkes med publisering? . 2017, (Juridisk fakultet UiO Forskningsledergruppe Oslo). @misc{RN54504,
title = {Hvordan få forskergruppen til å lykkes med publisering? },
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-10-01},
publisher = {Juridisk fakultet UiO Forskningsledergruppe},
note = {Juridisk fakultet UiO Forskningsledergruppe Oslo},
keywords = {Research policy, Service, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: Forholdet mellom EMD og nasjonale domstoler. 2017, (Domstolsadministrasjonen Kurs for dommere Gardermoen). @misc{RN54502,
title = {Forholdet mellom EMD og nasjonale domstoler},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-10-01},
publisher = {Domstolsadministrasjonen Kurs for dommere},
note = {Domstolsadministrasjonen Kurs for dommere Gardermoen},
keywords = {Service, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: On applying to the ERC. 2017, (Arctic University of Norway Presentation Tromsø). @misc{RN54501,
title = {On applying to the ERC},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-10-01},
publisher = {Arctic University of Norway Presentation},
note = {Arctic University of Norway Presentation Tromsø},
keywords = {ERC - European Research Council, Service, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: International Legal Human Rights: Neither Minimum Standards nor Directive Ideals. Implications of a ‘Political’ Theory of Human Rights. 2017, (NorthWestern University Workshop Chicago). @misc{RN54503,
title = {International Legal Human Rights: Neither Minimum Standards nor Directive Ideals. Implications of a ‘Political’ Theory of Human Rights},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-10-01},
publisher = {NorthWestern University Workshop},
note = {NorthWestern University Workshop Chicago},
keywords = {Human Rights, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Presentation on the European Research Council: whither hopes and fears?. 2017, (ECPR Panel Oslo). @misc{RN54505,
title = {Presentation on the European Research Council: whither hopes and fears?},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-09-01},
publisher = {ECPR Panel},
note = {ECPR Panel Oslo},
keywords = {ERC - European Research Council, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Are legitimacy critiques of International Courts only rhetorical rephrasing of dislikes, or can they be reasoned normative assessments?. 2017, (ECPR Panel Oslo). @misc{RN54506,
title = {Are legitimacy critiques of International Courts only rhetorical rephrasing of dislikes, or can they be reasoned normative assessments?},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-09-01},
publisher = {ECPR Panel},
note = {ECPR Panel Oslo},
keywords = {International courts, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Subsidiarity as a general principle of law. 2017, (PluriCourts Conference on General Principles as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals and the Coherence of International Law Paris). @misc{RN54510,
title = {Subsidiarity as a general principle of law},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-06-01},
publisher = {PluriCourts Conference on General Principles as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals and the Coherence of International Law},
note = {PluriCourts Conference on General Principles as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals and the Coherence of International Law Paris},
keywords = {International courts, Subsidiarity, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: A Better Signpost or a Better Walking Stick? How to Improve the Emerging European Consensus Doctrine and Why Bother?”. 2017, (Pompeu Fabra University Conference on the Legal Philosophy of Global Constitutionalism Barcelona). @misc{RN54511,
title = {A Better Signpost or a Better Walking Stick? How to Improve the Emerging European Consensus Doctrine and Why Bother?”},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-06-01},
publisher = {Pompeu Fabra University Conference on the Legal Philosophy of Global Constitutionalism},
note = {Pompeu Fabra University Conference on the Legal Philosophy of Global Constitutionalism Barcelona},
keywords = {European Consensus, European Court of Human Rights, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Towards a more just WTO: Which justice, whose interpretation?. 2017, (Normative Orders Frankfurt). @misc{RN54512,
title = {Towards a more just WTO: Which justice, whose interpretation?},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-04-01},
publisher = {Normative Orders},
note = {Normative Orders Frankfurt},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Gender Inequity on the International Bench – So What? Why we concerned – and why not.”. 2017, (PluriCourts Workshop on Gender on the International Bench Oslo). @misc{RN54513,
title = {Gender Inequity on the International Bench – So What? Why we concerned - and why not.”},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-03-01},
publisher = {PluriCourts Workshop on Gender on the International Bench},
note = {PluriCourts Workshop on Gender on the International Bench Oslo},
keywords = {Gender, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Human Rights in Norway – toward a research agenda”. 2017, (Workshop Prague). @misc{RN54514,
title = {Human Rights in Norway – toward a research agenda”},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-02-01},
publisher = {Workshop},
note = {Workshop Prague},
keywords = {Human Rights, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: Humanistisk forskning for et samfunn i forandring. In: Nytt Norsk Tidsskrift, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 51-57, 2017, ISSN: 0800-336x. @article{RN51794,
title = {Humanistisk forskning for et samfunn i forandring},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
url = {http://www.idunn.no/nnt/2017/01/humanistisk_forskning_for_et_samfunn_iforandring},
doi = {10.18261/issn.1504-3053-2017-01-05 ER},
issn = {0800-336x},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-01-01},
journal = {Nytt Norsk Tidsskrift},
volume = {34},
number = {1},
pages = {51-57},
abstract = {Dagens forskningspolitikk er ikke tilpasset humanioras særegne utfordringer. Hvis myndighetene ønsker å opprettholde humanioras samfunnsoppdrag, må rammevilkårene også håndtere disse utfordringene....},
keywords = {Research policy},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Dagens forskningspolitikk er ikke tilpasset humanioras særegne utfordringer. Hvis myndighetene ønsker å opprettholde humanioras samfunnsoppdrag, må rammevilkårene også håndtere disse utfordringene…. |
Saul, Matthew; Follesdal, Andreas; Ulfstein, Geir: The International Human Rights Judiciary and National Parliaments: Europe and Beyond. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2017. @book{RN52622,
title = {The International Human Rights Judiciary and National Parliaments: Europe and Beyond},
author = {Matthew Saul and Andreas Follesdal and Geir Ulfstein},
url = {https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/international-human-rights-judiciary-and-national-parliaments/B966B42C8F277F125FDC5DFE52EF18D5},
doi = {10.1017/9781316874820},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-01-01},
publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
address = {Cambridge},
series = {Studies on Human Rights Conventions},
abstract = {The emerging international human rights judiciary (IHRJ) threatens national democratic processes and 'hollows out' the scope of domestic and democratic decision-making, some argue. This new analysis confronts this head on by examining the interplay between national parliaments and the IHRJ, proposing that it advances parliament's efforts. Taking Europe and the European Court of Human Rights as its focus - drawing on theory, doctrine and practice - the authors answer a series of key questions. What role should parliaments play in realising human rights? Which factors influence the effects of the IHRJ on national parliaments' efforts? How can the IHRJ adjust its influence on parliamentary process? And what triggers the backlash against the IHRJ from parliaments and when? Here, the authors lay foundations for better informed scholarship and legal practice in the future, as well as a better understanding of how to improve the effectiveness and validity of the IHRJ.},
keywords = {Edited books, European Court of Human Rights, Human Rights},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {book}
}
The emerging international human rights judiciary (IHRJ) threatens national democratic processes and ‘hollows out’ the scope of domestic and democratic decision-making, some argue. This new analysis confronts this head on by examining the interplay between national parliaments and the IHRJ, proposing that it advances parliament’s efforts. Taking Europe and the European Court of Human Rights as its focus – drawing on theory, doctrine and practice – the authors answer a series of key questions. What role should parliaments play in realising human rights? Which factors influence the effects of the IHRJ on national parliaments’ efforts? How can the IHRJ adjust its influence on parliamentary process? And what triggers the backlash against the IHRJ from parliaments and when? Here, the authors lay foundations for better informed scholarship and legal practice in the future, as well as a better understanding of how to improve the effectiveness and validity of the IHRJ. |
Follesdal, Andreas: Reflective Equilibrium as justification and research method – Human Rights Research as Example Også Tromsø. 2017, (HF-fakultetet, UiO Vitenskapsteoriseminar Oslo). @misc{RN54515,
title = {Reflective Equilibrium as justification and research method - Human Rights Research as Example Også Tromsø},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-01-01},
publisher = {HF-fakultetet, UiO Vitenskapsteoriseminar},
note = {HF-fakultetet, UiO Vitenskapsteoriseminar Oslo},
keywords = {Human Rights, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: The Legitimate Authority of International Courts and its Limits: A challenge to Raz’ Service Conception?”. 2017, (Workshop on Legal Theory Dublin). @misc{RN54516,
title = {The Legitimate Authority of International Courts and its Limits: A challenge to Raz' Service Conception?”},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-01-01},
publisher = {Workshop on Legal Theory},
note = {Workshop on Legal Theory Dublin},
keywords = {International courts, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas; Ruud, Morten; Ulfstein, Geir: Menneskerettighetene og Norge: Rettsutvikling, rettsliggjøring og demokrati. Universitetsforlaget, Oslo, 2017. @book{RN51030,
title = {Menneskerettighetene og Norge: Rettsutvikling, rettsliggjøring og demokrati},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal and Morten Ruud and Geir Ulfstein},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-01-01},
publisher = {Universitetsforlaget},
address = {Oslo},
keywords = {Edited books},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {book}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas; Ruud, Morten; Ulfstein, Geir: De internasjonale menneskerettighetene og Norge: Spenninger og samspill. In: Føllesdal, Andreas; Ruud, Morten; Ulfstein, Geir (Ed.): Menneskerettighetene og Norge: Rettsutvikling, rettsliggjøring og demokrati, pp. 13-32, Universitetsforlaget, Oslo, 2017. @inbook{RN51031,
title = {De internasjonale menneskerettighetene og Norge: Spenninger og samspill},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal and Morten Ruud and Geir Ulfstein},
editor = {Andreas Føllesdal and Morten Ruud and Geir Ulfstein},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-01-01},
booktitle = {Menneskerettighetene og Norge: Rettsutvikling, rettsliggjøring og demokrati},
pages = {13-32},
publisher = {Universitetsforlaget},
address = {Oslo},
keywords = {Human Rights},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Theories of Human Rights: Political or Orthodox – why it matters. In: Maliks, Reidar; Karlsson, Johan Schaffer (Ed.): Moral and Political Conceptions of Human Rights: Implications for Theory and Practice, pp. 77-96, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2017. @inbook{RN50170,
title = {Theories of Human Rights: Political or Orthodox - why it matters},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
editor = {Reidar Maliks and Johan Schaffer Karlsson},
url = {http://www.follesdal.net/ms/Follesdal-2017-pol-moral-hr.pdf},
doi = {10.1017/9781316650134.006},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-01-01},
booktitle = {Moral and Political Conceptions of Human Rights: Implications for Theory and Practice},
pages = {77-96},
publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
address = {Cambridge},
abstract = {One important contribution by a philosophical theory of international legal human rights [ILHR] is to provide normative perspectives and standards to assess the current international human rights regimes. .. There is currently a discussion about how two families of theories may best be used to develop such a philosophical theory of ILHR. .."Orthodox" philosophical accounts .. tend to hold that behind the human rights movement generally – including ILHR - there is a unitary, cogent notion of moral human rights. .. "Political" theories pursue another aim and justificatory strategy. They aspire to systematize the existing international legal human rights practice, and seek to end with a theory with sufficient critical standards, - without drawing on a prior concept of a human right. ... The aim of this article is primarily to alleviate some of the alleged conflicts, in particular to defend at least one Political theory against charges that it is unduly constrained to actual consensus on premises in defense of ILHR, that it is too closely linked to the current state system to match the universal ambitions of human rights, and that it seeks to avoid normative premises.},
keywords = {Human Rights},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
One important contribution by a philosophical theory of international legal human rights [ILHR] is to provide normative perspectives and standards to assess the current international human rights regimes. .. There is currently a discussion about how two families of theories may best be used to develop such a philosophical theory of ILHR. ..”Orthodox” philosophical accounts .. tend to hold that behind the human rights movement generally – including ILHR – there is a unitary, cogent notion of moral human rights. .. “Political” theories pursue another aim and justificatory strategy. They aspire to systematize the existing international legal human rights practice, and seek to end with a theory with sufficient critical standards, – without drawing on a prior concept of a human right. … The aim of this article is primarily to alleviate some of the alleged conflicts, in particular to defend at least one Political theory against charges that it is unduly constrained to actual consensus on premises in defense of ILHR, that it is too closely linked to the current state system to match the universal ambitions of human rights, and that it seeks to avoid normative premises. |
Follesdal, Andreas: Independent yet Accountable: Stress Test Lessons for the European Court of Human Rights. In: Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 484-510, 2017. @article{RN50477,
title = {Independent yet Accountable: Stress Test Lessons for the European Court of Human Rights},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
url = {http://www.follesdal.net/ms/Follesdal-2017-indep-accty-ecthr.pdf},
doi = {10.1177/1023263X17729945},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-01-01},
journal = {Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law},
volume = {24},
number = {4},
pages = {484-510},
abstract = {An important ‘stress test’ for regional human rights courts would be to see how well such courts perform when faced with authoritarian, human rights-violating regimes that they are supposed to hinder or constrain. These states are not only subjects of the court, but also its masters insofar as they enjoy various forms of control and accountability mechanisms that may constrain the court’s independence. The article argues that, at least in the case of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), its precarious ‘constrained independence’ should be modified to enhance its impact even under such circumstances. Such changes could strengthen the ECtHR’s impartial and independent role without running the risk of turning it into a so-called ‘juristocracy’ - subjecting European states to the arbitrary rule of international judges.},
keywords = {European Court of Human Rights, Human Rights},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
An important ‘stress test’ for regional human rights courts would be to see how well such courts perform when faced with authoritarian, human rights-violating regimes that they are supposed to hinder or constrain. These states are not only subjects of the court, but also its masters insofar as they enjoy various forms of control and accountability mechanisms that may constrain the court’s independence. The article argues that, at least in the case of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), its precarious ‘constrained independence’ should be modified to enhance its impact even under such circumstances. Such changes could strengthen the ECtHR’s impartial and independent role without running the risk of turning it into a so-called ‘juristocracy’ – subjecting European states to the arbitrary rule of international judges. |
Follesdal, Andreas: Exporting the Margin of Appreciation: Lessons for the Inter-American Court of Human Rights?. In: International journal of constitutional law, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 359-371, 2017. @article{RN50633,
title = {Exporting the Margin of Appreciation: Lessons for the Inter-American Court of Human Rights?},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
url = {http://www.follesdal.net/ms/Follesdal-2017-interam-margin.pdf},
doi = {10.1093/icon/mox019},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-01-01},
journal = {International journal of constitutional law},
volume = {15},
number = {2},
pages = {359-371},
abstract = {What might the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACtHR) gain from a 'judicial dialogue’ with the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in the form of borrowing the ECtHR’s margin of appreciation doctrine? Arguably, a favorable interpretation of the vague margin of appreciation doctrine allows the ECtHR to provide both human rights protection and deference to domestic democratic decision-making. This may guide the IACtHR’s attempt to respect both the American Convention on Human Rights and its sovereign creators. In particular, the ECtHR’s Doctrine may illustrate how these regional courts can interact with states that violate the respective conventions after less than fully democratic processes—in the eyes of the courts. The same margin of appreciation doctrine may justify more or less sovereignty-invading stances by both the IACtHR and by the ECtHR, depending on to the different levels of entrenchment of a democratic culture and rule of law in the state of concern, and depending on the actual deliberations carried out in the particular case.},
keywords = {European Court of Human Rights, Human Rights, Margin of Appreciation},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
What might the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACtHR) gain from a ‘judicial dialogue’ with the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in the form of borrowing the ECtHR’s margin of appreciation doctrine? Arguably, a favorable interpretation of the vague margin of appreciation doctrine allows the ECtHR to provide both human rights protection and deference to domestic democratic decision-making. This may guide the IACtHR’s attempt to respect both the American Convention on Human Rights and its sovereign creators. In particular, the ECtHR’s Doctrine may illustrate how these regional courts can interact with states that violate the respective conventions after less than fully democratic processes—in the eyes of the courts. The same margin of appreciation doctrine may justify more or less sovereignty-invading stances by both the IACtHR and by the ECtHR, depending on to the different levels of entrenchment of a democratic culture and rule of law in the state of concern, and depending on the actual deliberations carried out in the particular case. |
Follesdal, Andreas: Lessons from judicial dialogues between the European, the African and the Inter-American Courts of Human Rights. 2016, (PluriCourts Workshop Buenos Aires). @misc{RN54517,
title = {Lessons from judicial dialogues between the European, the African and the Inter-American Courts of Human Rights},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-12-01},
publisher = {PluriCourts Workshop},
note = {PluriCourts Workshop Buenos Aires},
keywords = {Human Rights, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: [No title]. 2016, (Institut für die Wissenschaften vom Menschen (WM) – Institute for Human Sciences ERC mentoring initiative Wien). @misc{RN54518,
title = {[No title]},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-12-01},
publisher = {Institut für die Wissenschaften vom Menschen (WM) - Institute for Human Sciences ERC mentoring initiative},
note = {Institut für die Wissenschaften vom Menschen (WM) - Institute for Human Sciences ERC mentoring initiative Wien},
keywords = {ERC - European Research Council, Service, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: The role of the ECtHR: protecting minority rights or respecting democracy, or both – or neither?. 2016, (The Arctic University of Norway Tromsø). @misc{RN54521,
title = {The role of the ECtHR: protecting minority rights or respecting democracy, or both – or neither?},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-11-01},
publisher = {The Arctic University of Norway},
note = {The Arctic University of Norway Tromsø},
keywords = {Democratic theory, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Humanistisk forskning for et samfunn i forandring. 2016, (Det Norske Videnskaps-Akademi – DNVA Seminar om humanistiske fag – selvforståelse og samfunnsoppdrag Oslo). @misc{RN54519,
title = {Humanistisk forskning for et samfunn i forandring},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-11-01},
publisher = {Det Norske Videnskaps-Akademi - DNVA Seminar om humanistiske fag - selvforståelse og samfunnsoppdrag},
note = {Det Norske Videnskaps-Akademi - DNVA Seminar om humanistiske fag - selvforståelse og samfunnsoppdrag Oslo},
keywords = {Research policy, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Are Concepts of Legitimacy for International Courts Related, and How?. 2016, (University of Gothenburg Gothenburg). @misc{RN54523,
title = {Are Concepts of Legitimacy for International Courts Related, and How?},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-11-01},
publisher = {University of Gothenburg},
note = {University of Gothenburg Gothenburg},
keywords = {International courts, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Are Concepts of Legitimacy for International Courts Related, and How?. 2016, (Nordic Network for political theory Oslo). @misc{RN54522,
title = {Are Concepts of Legitimacy for International Courts Related, and How?},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-11-01},
publisher = {Nordic Network for political theory},
note = {Nordic Network for political theory Oslo},
keywords = {International courts, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Are Concepts of Legitimacy for International Courts Related, and How?. 2016, (The Arctic University of Norway Workshop Tromsø). @misc{RN54520,
title = {Are Concepts of Legitimacy for International Courts Related, and How?},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-11-01},
publisher = {The Arctic University of Norway Workshop},
note = {The Arctic University of Norway Workshop Tromsø},
keywords = {International courts, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: Domstolens og dommernes uavhengighet, hvorfor og hva slags?. 2016, (PluriCourts Ryssdalseminaret Oslo). @misc{RN54524,
title = {Domstolens og dommernes uavhengighet, hvorfor og hva slags?},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-10-01},
publisher = {PluriCourts Ryssdalseminaret},
note = {PluriCourts Ryssdalseminaret Oslo},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: On Sovereign Wealth Fund complicity/ disinvestment. 2016, (Australian National University Canberra). @misc{RN54526,
title = {On Sovereign Wealth Fund complicity/ disinvestment},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-10-01},
publisher = {Australian National University},
note = {Australian National University Canberra},
keywords = {SRI - Socially responsible investing, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: The legitimacy of authorities in the multi-level global basic structure: the case of International Courts. 2016, (Sydney University Workshop On the legitimacy of the state Sydney). @misc{RN54527,
title = {The legitimacy of authorities in the multi-level global basic structure: the case of International Courts},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-10-01},
publisher = {Sydney University Workshop On the legitimacy of the state},
note = {Sydney University Workshop On the legitimacy of the state Sydney},
keywords = {International courts, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Constitutionalization or democratication of ICs?. 2016, (Center for Deliberative Democracy Canberra). @misc{RN54525,
title = {Constitutionalization or democratication of ICs?},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-10-01},
publisher = {Center for Deliberative Democracy},
note = {Center for Deliberative Democracy Canberra},
keywords = {Democratic theory, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Are Concepts of Legitimacy for International Courts Related, and How?. 2016, (Shanghai – Harvard conference on justice Shanghai). @misc{RN54531,
title = {Are Concepts of Legitimacy for International Courts Related, and How?},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-07-01},
publisher = {Shanghai – Harvard conference on justice},
note = {Shanghai – Harvard conference on justice Shanghai},
keywords = {International courts, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Subsidiarity. 2016, (International society for constitutional law ICON Workshop Berlin). @misc{RN54533,
title = {Subsidiarity},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-06-01},
publisher = {International society for constitutional law ICON Workshop},
note = {International society for constitutional law ICON Workshop Berlin},
keywords = {Subsidiarity, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: European Consensus – Cairns or Crutches?. 2016, (Workshop on European Consensus European University Institute EUI Florence). @misc{RN54534,
title = {European Consensus – Cairns or Crutches?},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-06-01},
publisher = {European University Institute EUI Workshop on European Consensus},
note = {Workshop on European Consensus European University Institute EUI Florence},
keywords = {European Consensus, European Court of Human Rights, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: On the separation of powers doctrine and International Courts. 2016, (Pompeu Fabra University Workshop on Republicanism and International Courts Barcelona). @misc{RN54539,
title = {On the separation of powers doctrine and International Courts},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-05-01},
publisher = {Pompeu Fabra University Workshop on Republicanism and International Courts},
note = {Pompeu Fabra University Workshop on Republicanism and International Courts Barcelona},
keywords = {International courts, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: On PluriCourts’ research on gender on the bench. 2016, (PluriCourts Annual Conference Oslo). @misc{RN54535,
title = {On PluriCourts' research on gender on the bench},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-05-01},
publisher = {PluriCourts Annual Conference},
note = {PluriCourts Annual Conference Oslo},
keywords = {Diversity, Gender, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Are Concepts of Legitimacy for International Courts Related, and How?. 2016, (European University Institute EUI Workshop on The Rise of International Courts: Normative and Sociological Perspectives Florence). @misc{RN54537,
title = {Are Concepts of Legitimacy for International Courts Related, and How?},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-05-01},
publisher = {European University Institute EUI Workshop on The Rise of International Courts: Normative and Sociological Perspectives},
note = {European University Institute EUI Workshop on The Rise of International Courts: Normative and Sociological Perspectives Florence},
keywords = {International courts, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: 7 Habits of Highly Reluctant Nordic States -Explanations and Challenges to Scepticism toward Judicial Review. 2016, (European University Institute EUI Still Exceptional? Nordic Countries Constitutional Tradition in the 21st Century, Conference Florence). @misc{RN54538,
title = {7 Habits of Highly Reluctant Nordic States -Explanations and Challenges to Scepticism toward Judicial Review},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-05-01},
publisher = {European University Institute EUI Still Exceptional? Nordic Countries Constitutional Tradition in the 21st Century, Conference},
note = {European University Institute EUI Still Exceptional? Nordic Countries Constitutional Tradition in the 21st Century, Conference Florence},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: [No title]. 2016, (PluriCourts Workshop on prisoners voting London). @misc{RN54536,
title = {[No title]},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-05-01},
publisher = {PluriCourts Workshop on prisoners voting},
note = {PluriCourts Workshop on prisoners voting London},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: On equity in international law. 2016, (Faculty of Law, Arctic University of Norway Tromsø). @misc{RN54542,
title = {On equity in international law},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-04-01},
publisher = {Faculty of Law, Arctic University of Norway},
note = {Faculty of Law, Arctic University of Norway Tromsø},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Not Cairns but Crutches: Emerging European consensus – why it should matter for the margin of appreciation, and how.. 2016, (iCourts Workshop on the Margin of Appreciation and Democracy Copenhagen). @misc{RN54541,
title = {Not Cairns but Crutches: Emerging European consensus – why it should matter for the margin of appreciation, and how.},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-04-01},
publisher = {iCourts Workshop on the Margin of Appreciation and Democracy},
note = {iCourts Workshop on the Margin of Appreciation and Democracy Copenhagen},
keywords = {Democratic theory, European Consensus, European Court of Human Rights, Margin of Appreciation, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: MultiRights – findings. 2016, (MultiRights Concluding Conference Oslo). @misc{RN54543,
title = {MultiRights – findings},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-03-01},
publisher = {MultiRights Concluding Conference},
note = {MultiRights Concluding Conference Oslo},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: The Soul of Europe in the Balance – the conflict between the ECtHR and the CJEU. 2016, (Tufts University Workshop on Europe and Global Justice Medford). @misc{RN54544,
title = {The Soul of Europe in the Balance – the conflict between the ECtHR and the CJEU},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-02-01},
publisher = {Tufts University Workshop on Europe and Global Justice},
note = {Tufts University Workshop on Europe and Global Justice Medford},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: European Identity and EU Responses to the Refugee Crisis. 2016, (Tufts University Workshop Medford). @misc{RN54545,
title = {European Identity and EU Responses to the Refugee Crisis},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-02-01},
publisher = {Tufts University Workshop},
note = {Tufts University Workshop Medford},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas; Tsereteli, Nino: The margin of appreciation in Europe and beyond – Special Issue. The International Journal of Human Rights, 2016. @book{RN50638,
title = {The margin of appreciation in Europe and beyond - Special Issue},
author = {Andreas Follesdal and Nino Tsereteli},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-01},
volume = {20},
publisher = {The International Journal of Human Rights},
series = {The International Journal of Human Rights},
abstract = {Is the margin of appreciation doctrine of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) a promising model of deference by a regional human rights court towards democratic states? Or does this doctrine amount to an abdication by such courts from their proper tasks of protecting human rights against violations by states? This special section contributes to the ongoing scholarly debate about the margin of appreciation doctrine, originally developed by the ECtHR. It also explores the emergence of similar doctrines of deference in human rights adjudication outside Europe. The four articles also raise issues relevant for a broader debate about legitimacy and effectiveness of international courts. The authors cover a number of courts, well-established as well as relatively young ones, operating in different legal and political contexts. It allows reflecting on common as well as courtspecific reasons for exercising or avoiding deference.},
keywords = {European Court of Human Rights, Human Rights, International courts, Margin of Appreciation, Special issues},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {book}
}
Is the margin of appreciation doctrine of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) a promising model of deference by a regional human rights court towards democratic states? Or does this doctrine amount to an abdication by such courts from their proper tasks of protecting human rights against violations by states? This special section contributes to the ongoing scholarly debate about the margin of appreciation doctrine, originally developed by the ECtHR. It also explores the emergence of similar doctrines of deference in human rights adjudication outside Europe. The four articles also raise issues relevant for a broader debate about legitimacy and effectiveness of international courts. The authors cover a number of courts, well-established as well as relatively young ones, operating in different legal and political contexts. It allows reflecting on common as well as courtspecific reasons for exercising or avoiding deference. |
Follesdal, Andreas: Constitutionalization, not democratization of international law. 2016, (European University Institute – EUI Workshop on Global Constitutionalism Florence). @misc{RN54546,
title = {Constitutionalization, not democratization of international law},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-01},
publisher = {European University Institute - EUI Workshop on Global Constitutionalism},
note = {European University Institute - EUI Workshop on Global Constitutionalism Florence},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Ulfstein, Geir: The European Court of Human Rights and national courts: a constitutional relationship?. In: Arnardóttir, Oddný Mjöll; Buyse, Antoine (Ed.): Shifting Centres of Gravity in Human Rights Protection, pp. 46-56, Routledge, London, 2016. @inbook{RN50637,
title = {The European Court of Human Rights and national courts: a constitutional relationship?},
author = {Geir Ulfstein},
editor = {Oddný Mjöll Arnardóttir and Antoine Buyse},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-01},
booktitle = {Shifting Centres of Gravity in Human Rights Protection},
pages = {46-56},
publisher = {Routledge},
address = {London},
keywords = {Human Rights},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Implications of contested multilateralism for global constitutionalism. In: Global Constitutionalism, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 297-308, 2016. @article{RN50261,
title = {Implications of contested multilateralism for global constitutionalism},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
url = {www.follesdal.net/ms/Follesdal-2016-contested-multilateralism.pdf},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381716000186},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-01},
journal = {Global Constitutionalism},
volume = {5},
number = {3},
pages = {297-308},
abstract = {The term 'global constitutionalism' has been used in various ways, all of which may be appropriate for different purposes. The first sections therefore specify some salient features of that term and of 'constitutional pluralism' - before turning to three implications of Morse and Keohane's claims about 'contested multilateralism' (CM) for global constitutionalism, including new forms of constitutional pluralism. The focus is primarily on aspects of CM regarded as a mode of constitutional change, considering what to make of such a form of 'extra-constitutional' procedure. Research challenges for political science, law and normative political theory are identified. Challenges by CM to the stability of international law are argued to be overdrawn. Of greater concern is that CM lends itself to piecemeal adjustments rather than reforms with an eye to the systemic effects. However, these worries must be tempered by the non-ideal nature of the present legal structure which should make us wary of imposing normative standards drawn from settings where institutions are fully just and generally complied with.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
The term ‘global constitutionalism’ has been used in various ways, all of which may be appropriate for different purposes. The first sections therefore specify some salient features of that term and of ‘constitutional pluralism’ – before turning to three implications of Morse and Keohane’s claims about ‘contested multilateralism’ (CM) for global constitutionalism, including new forms of constitutional pluralism. The focus is primarily on aspects of CM regarded as a mode of constitutional change, considering what to make of such a form of ‘extra-constitutional’ procedure. Research challenges for political science, law and normative political theory are identified. Challenges by CM to the stability of international law are argued to be overdrawn. Of greater concern is that CM lends itself to piecemeal adjustments rather than reforms with an eye to the systemic effects. However, these worries must be tempered by the non-ideal nature of the present legal structure which should make us wary of imposing normative standards drawn from settings where institutions are fully just and generally complied with. |
Follesdal, Andreas: On divestment from oil industry. 2016, (Concerned Students’ association, UiO Panel debate Oslo). @misc{RN54540,
title = {On divestment from oil industry},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-00-01},
publisher = {Concerned Students' association, UiO Panel debate},
note = {Concerned Students' association, UiO Panel debate Oslo},
keywords = {Climate, Public policy, SRI - Socially responsible investing, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: On the writing and submission process. 2015, (PluriCourts Publish and Flourish Workshop Oslo). @misc{RN54549,
title = {On the writing and submission process},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-12-01},
publisher = {PluriCourts Publish and Flourish Workshop},
note = {PluriCourts Publish and Flourish Workshop Oslo},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Legitimation strategies – philosophical perspectives. 2015, (PluriCourts Concepts and methods workshop on Legitimation and Performance Oslo). @misc{RN54548,
title = {Legitimation strategies – philosophical perspectives},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-12-01},
publisher = {PluriCourts Concepts and methods workshop on Legitimation and Performance},
note = {PluriCourts Concepts and methods workshop on Legitimation and Performance Oslo},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Fragmentation and integration for better and worse: Assessing the doctrines of a Margin of Appreciation and of the Emerging European Consensus. 2015, (Conference on The Global Challenge of Human Rights Integration: Towards a User’s Perspective University of Ghent Ghent). @misc{RN54547,
title = {Fragmentation and integration for better and worse: Assessing the doctrines of a Margin of Appreciation and of the Emerging European Consensus},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-12-01},
publisher = {University of Ghent Conference on The Global Challenge of Human Rights Integration: Towards a User's Perspective},
note = {Conference on The Global Challenge of Human Rights Integration: Towards a User's Perspective University of Ghent Ghent},
keywords = {European Consensus, European Court of Human Rights, Human Rights, Margin of Appreciation, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: The Soul of Europe in the Balance Supremacy of the European Court of Human Rights or the Court of Justice of the European Union – what is at stake?. 2015, (Arctic University of Norway Workshop Tromsø). @misc{RN54553,
title = {The Soul of Europe in the Balance Supremacy of the European Court of Human Rights or the Court of Justice of the European Union – what is at stake?},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-11-01},
publisher = {Arctic University of Norway Workshop},
note = {Arctic University of Norway Workshop Tromsø},
keywords = {European Court of Human Rights, Human Rights, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: ASEAN Declaration on Human Rights: a principle of subsidiarity to the rescue?. 2015, (German-Southeast Asian Center for Public Policy and Good Governance Lecture Bangkok). @misc{RN54551,
title = {ASEAN Declaration on Human Rights: a principle of subsidiarity to the rescue?},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-11-01},
publisher = {German-Southeast Asian Center for Public Policy and Good Governance Lecture},
note = {German-Southeast Asian Center for Public Policy and Good Governance Lecture Bangkok},
keywords = {Human Rights, Subsidiarity, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: ASEAN Declaration on Human Rights: a principle of subsidiarity to the rescue?. 2015, (Asean Society of International Law Conference Bangkok). @misc{RN54550,
title = {ASEAN Declaration on Human Rights: a principle of subsidiarity to the rescue?},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-11-01},
publisher = {Asean Society of International Law Conference},
note = {Asean Society of International Law Conference Bangkok},
keywords = {Human Rights, Subsidiarity, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Føllesdal, Andreas: Åpning/initiativtaker. 2015, (Det Norske Videnskaps-Akademi – DNVA Om prioriteringer av helsetjenester Bergen). @misc{RN54555,
title = {Åpning/initiativtaker},
author = {Andreas Føllesdal},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-10-01},
publisher = {Det Norske Videnskaps-Akademi - DNVA Om prioriteringer av helsetjenester},
note = {Det Norske Videnskaps-Akademi - DNVA Om prioriteringer av helsetjenester Bergen},
keywords = {Policy advice, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Workshop on the Performance of International Courts. 2015, (Temple University Philadelphia). @misc{RN54557,
title = {Workshop on the Performance of International Courts},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-10-01},
publisher = {Temple University},
note = {Temple University Philadelphia},
keywords = {International courts, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Politics of Judicial Independence and Judicial Accountability at the ECtHR Independence of ICs. 2015, (Workshop on Politics of judicial independence and judicial accountability Prague). @misc{RN54556,
title = {Politics of Judicial Independence and Judicial Accountability at the ECtHR Independence of ICs},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-10-01},
publisher = {Workshop on Politics of judicial independence and judicial accountability},
note = {Workshop on Politics of judicial independence and judicial accountability Prague},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Organizer, workshop on the ECtHR rulings on prisoners in Russia. 2015, (Higher School of Economics Moscow). @misc{RN54554,
title = {Organizer, workshop on the ECtHR rulings on prisoners in Russia},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-10-01},
publisher = {Higher School of Economics},
note = {Higher School of Economics Moscow},
keywords = {talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: On the relationship between authority and legitimacy of international courts. 2015, (Northeastern University Workshop on Alter-Helfer-Madsen: ‘How context shapes the authority of international courts Chicago). @misc{RN54558,
title = {On the relationship between authority and legitimacy of international courts},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-10-01},
publisher = {Northeastern University Workshop on Alter-Helfer-Madsen: 'How context shapes the authority of international courts},
note = {Northeastern University Workshop on Alter-Helfer-Madsen: 'How context shapes the authority of international courts Chicago},
keywords = {International courts, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Criteria for [parliamentary] civil disobedience of international courts. 2015, (Middlesex University Workshop on ‘International Human Rights Judiciary and Parliaments’ London). @misc{RN54552,
title = {Criteria for [parliamentary] civil disobedience of international courts},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-10-01},
publisher = {Middlesex University Workshop on 'International Human Rights Judiciary and Parliaments'},
note = {Middlesex University Workshop on 'International Human Rights Judiciary and Parliaments' London},
keywords = {Human Rights, International courts, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Does The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine Benefit or Hinder the ECtHR’s Contribution to Democratic Transitions?. 2015, (PluriCourts and Koc University Workshop on The European Court of Human Rights: Promoter or Predator of Democratic Transitions? Istanbul). @misc{RN54559,
title = {Does The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine Benefit or Hinder the ECtHR's Contribution to Democratic Transitions?},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-09-01},
publisher = {PluriCourts and Koc University Workshop on The European Court of Human Rights: Promoter or Predator of Democratic Transitions?},
note = {PluriCourts and Koc University Workshop on The European Court of Human Rights: Promoter or Predator of Democratic Transitions? Istanbul},
keywords = {European Court of Human Rights, Human Rights, Margin of Appreciation, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Legitimation strategies of international courts: strategic bootstrapping, transitional justice in practice, cynical manipulation – or all of the above. 2015, (ECPR Panel on The Legitimacy of International Courts – What is it, Does it make a Difference? Montreal). @misc{RN54560,
title = {Legitimation strategies of international courts: strategic bootstrapping, transitional justice in practice, cynical manipulation – or all of the above},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-08-01},
publisher = {ECPR Panel on The Legitimacy of International Courts – What is it, Does it make a Difference?},
note = {ECPR Panel on The Legitimacy of International Courts – What is it, Does it make a Difference? Montreal},
keywords = {International courts, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Exporting Subsidiarity and the Margin of Appreciation: Lessons for the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. 2015, (IVR Workshop on International human rights courts: enhancers or enemies of democracy – or both? European and Inter-American perspectives Washington). @misc{RN54562,
title = {Exporting Subsidiarity and the Margin of Appreciation: Lessons for the Inter-American Court of Human Rights},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-07-01},
publisher = {IVR Workshop on International human rights courts: enhancers or enemies of democracy - or both? European and Inter-American perspectives},
note = {IVR Workshop on International human rights courts: enhancers or enemies of democracy - or both? European and Inter-American perspectives Washington},
keywords = {Human Rights, Margin of Appreciation, Subsidiarity, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Are Concepts of Legitimacy for International Courts Related, and How?. 2015, (Political Philosophy Colloquium Frankfurt). @misc{RN54564,
title = {Are Concepts of Legitimacy for International Courts Related, and How?},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-07-01},
publisher = {Political Philosophy Colloquium},
note = {Political Philosophy Colloquium Frankfurt},
keywords = {International courts, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Are Concepts of Legitimacy for International Courts Related, and How?. 2015, (Justitia Amplificata Conference on The Challenges of Global Pluralism Frankfurt). @misc{RN54563,
title = {Are Concepts of Legitimacy for International Courts Related, and How?},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-07-01},
publisher = {Justitia Amplificata Conference on The Challenges of Global Pluralism},
note = {Justitia Amplificata Conference on The Challenges of Global Pluralism Frankfurt},
keywords = {International courts, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
Follesdal, Andreas: Are Concepts of Legitimacy for International Courts Related, and How?. 2015, (IVR Workshop on Legitimacy discourses about international courts: Reason or emotion? Washington). @misc{RN54561,
title = {Are Concepts of Legitimacy for International Courts Related, and How?},
author = {Andreas Follesdal},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-07-01},
publisher = {IVR Workshop on Legitimacy discourses about international courts: Reason or emotion?},
note = {IVR Workshop on Legitimacy discourses about international courts: Reason or emotion? Washington},
keywords = {International courts, talk},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {misc}
}
|
