Recent Posts

In Defense of Deference: International Human Rights as Standards of Review

Journal of Social Philosophy. Member states of the Council of Europe subject themselves to judicial human rights review by the European Court of Human Rights. That Court in turn defers sometimes to the judgments of domestic courts about compliance, granting them a margin of discretion, more so when it sees a European consensus. This complex practice can be justified based on arguments about comparative epistemic expertise, respect for democratic decision making, and the need to avoid undue judicial discretion – juristocracy. While this account supports the general practice, it points to certain weaknesses and areas of improvement: the rules to nominate and elect judges and members of the Registry of the Court, the doctrine of the margin of appreciation, and the rationales for a European consensus. [D0I]

  1. Review Symposium on Carmen Pavel’s Law Beyond the State Comments Off on Review Symposium on Carmen Pavel’s Law Beyond the State
  2. Introducing David Lefkowitz’s Philosophy and International Law Comments Off on Introducing David Lefkowitz’s Philosophy and International Law
  3. Vinnarane av UiOs forskningspris 2021 Comments Off on Vinnarane av UiOs forskningspris 2021
  4. “A Just yet Unequal European Union” Comments Off on “A Just yet Unequal European Union”
  5. Holbergprisen 2021: Martha Nussbaum Comments Off on Holbergprisen 2021: Martha Nussbaum
  6. International Human Rights Courts and the (International) Rule of Law: Part of the Solution, Part of the Problem, or Both? Comments Off on International Human Rights Courts and the (International) Rule of Law: Part of the Solution, Part of the Problem, or Both?
  7. How Many Women Judges Are Enough on International Courts? Comments Off on How Many Women Judges Are Enough on International Courts?
  8. Om Forskningsrådets skrøpelige søknadsregime: Symptomer, diagnoser og resepter Comments Off on Om Forskningsrådets skrøpelige søknadsregime: Symptomer, diagnoser og resepter
  9. Advarsel mot portforbud er et retorisk grep Comments Off on Advarsel mot portforbud er et retorisk grep